Saturday, April 6, 2013

Tax Day Freebies and Deals! / Several establishments will be offering special deals on or around April 15

David Muhlbaum for Kiplinger.com writes: When tax day comes April 15, you can get a little relief from the stress of filing your return by taking advantage of freebies and special deals that companies will be offering on or around that day.
This is an early look: Check back here for promotions. We'll add 'em as we find 'em. Also note that while many distribute deals via Facebook, you don't have to be signed up to the service to view and download the coupons.
Arby's is in its third year of offering a freebie — this year offering the choice of potato cakes in addition to curly fries. A coupon will be available starting April 9 on Arby's Facebook page to get a coupon and enter its sweepstakes to win one of 10 $500 tax relief payouts. 

Also a repeat promoter, Bruegger's Bagels will offer its Big Bagel Bundle for just $10.40 — a savings of up to $3.50 — April 12 through April 15. The Big Bagel Bundle includes a baker's dozen of Bruegger's bagels and two tubs of Bruegger's made-in-Vermont cream cheese. You'll need a coupon, which you can download from Bruegger's Facebook page or sign up for (by April 10) on their web page.
Chili's will have a coupon for a free appetizer or dessert with the purchase of an adult entree April 16 through April 18. The coupon will be made available on its Facebook page. You can print the coupon or show it to your server via smart phone.
Cinnabon will offer two free Classic Cinnabon Bites on April 15 from 6 p.m. to 8 p.m. at participating locations as part of its Tax Day Bites promotion. No coupon needed. Last year, more than 60,000 bites were given out nationwide through the event, but it's first-come, first serve.
Many HydroMassage locations nationwide will provide free massages between April 15 and April 19 to help eliminate the stress of tax filing. Get a coupon for a free massage at www.hydromassage.com/taxday.htm and call ahead to schedule a session.
Office Depot is letting customers make 25 single-sided black and white copies and offering up to 5 pounds of shredding for free through May 1. No coupon is necessary, and the offer is valid in stores nationwide.
Panda Express is returning to the tax-day specials, though they seem to have locked in on last year's date: There's a free single serving of its Samurai Surf and Turf at participating locations April 17. Get it with this coupon.
Oh, and yes, the IRS. Yup, they have something for free: a calendar that includes important 2013 filing dates. The print run is over and all have been distributed but you can still download one in PDF form. Bring your own ink cartridge.
Procrastinators with adjusted gross incomes of $57,000 or less can file their federal returns (and some state returns) for free by using the IRS's Free File service. AARP offers free tax help to low- to moderate-income taxpayers of all ages. Search for an AARP Tax-Aide location near you
Posted on 7:19 AM | Categories:

Overseas Finances Can Trip Up Americans Abroad / So how should Americans working abroad or with a financial life in two countries manage their finances?

Paul Sullivan for the New York Times writes: Living and working abroad may sound romantic. But having a financial life in more than one country — if one of those countries is the United States — is becoming increasingly complicated.
Managing an international financial life was once solely the purview of the superrich, who jetted around the world. But given the still-high unemployment rate in the United States, opportunities for middle-class jobs abroad, in areas like finance, oil and construction, are becoming more appealing.
By taking those jobs, though, many middle- and upper-middle-class Americans have found it more and more difficult to comply with requirements on reporting the existence and value of bank accounts overseas and to reconcile the taxes of different countries.
At the same time, Americans from immigrant families who have bank accounts in their home countries that they may have overlooked are being swept up by the same laws used to ferret out millionaires and billionaires stashing money in secret Swiss accounts. The Internal Revenue Service has increased its examination of such accounts, lawyers said, with serious penalties for those who have not reported them.
So how should Americans working abroad or with a financial life in two countries manage their finances?
BASIC CONFUSION One of the great enemies of people working abroad is bad advice, especially since there are fewer sources to counter misinformation thousands of miles from home.
For example, Americans working abroad are eligible for the foreign earned income exclusion, which in 2012 exempted the first $95,100 from tax. But even if Americans earn less than that or are paying higher taxes in the country where they are working, they still need to file a tax return with the I.R.S.
“Some think if you’re paying taxes in Germany and the Netherlands and the taxes are higher than in the U.S., you don’t have to file a return,” said Ian M. Comisky, partner at the law firm Blank Rome and co-author of “Tax Fraud and Evasion.” “That’s not accurate. You have to file a U.S. return, and you get a credit for it.”
Increased I.R.S. scrutiny of bank accounts abroad under the Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act, which began to take effect this year, means foreign banks must report more information on American account holders. Mr. Comisky said he had received calls from people with undeclared overseas accounts who asked if they could transfer the money to a friend who was not an American citizen and have that person transfer it back to them as a gift to avoid the penalties from years of not paying their taxes.
“I said, ‘You can do it, but it’s illegal,’ ” Mr. Comisky said. “That’s pure tax evasion.”
There is also the issue of other countries’ taxes that the United States does not recognize. Marylouise Serrato, executive director of American Citizens Abroad, a lobbying group, said many wealth, social and value-added taxes in Europe were not eligible for credits or deductions on American taxes. “They could be a significant part of your foreign tax bill, but you can’t apply them to your U.S. taxes, so you just pay them,” she said.
While making mistakes on taxes is common, Frank Reilly, president of Reilly Financial Advisors, which has had an office in Saudi Arabia since the 1970s, said people working abroad also often made poor decisions about real estate.
With homes in the United States, there are two common problems. One is the logistical challenge of renting out a home you own from thousands of miles away. The other is deciding to buy a retirement home somewhere in the United States when you plan to work abroad for many more years. By the time you stop working, you may not want to live there.
The most financially destructive real estate problem comes when income and mortgagepayments are in different currencies. “When someone in the United States takes out a mortgage, they know that their payment is $1,300,” Mr. Reilly said. “When they take out a mortgage in euros, it could be 1,300 euros. That could be $1,500 or $1,800 or $2,300. They’re exposed to currency fluctuations.”
Mr. Reilly said he counseled clients to imagine what a shift in the exchange rate could mean to them and asked some to consider putting many months of payments in that currency as a hedge.
ACCOUNT COMPLICATIONS While new American reporting requirements are meant to catch tax evaders, they are causing problems for people simply making a living abroad.
Ms. Serrato said her group had heard of many instances of Americans abroad having their accounts closed in the United States because the banks did not want to deal with the reporting requirements. On the other end, she has heard that opening accounts in different countries has become more difficult.
“We support the crackdown on tax evasion, but there has been a lot of blanket legislation put out there that can hit the unknowing or the unwitting,” she said.
Foreign pension plans, for instance, are not considered tax-exempt under American law. Americans are required to report the plans to the I.R.S. as they would bank or investment accounts. Failure to do so carries harsh penalties.
“If you’re a person who didn’t know your pension account needed to be reported but you reported your checking and savings account,” Ms. Serrato said, “now you’re faced with criminal penalties for a filing error and you could end up paying a penalty that could wipe out 50 percent of that account.”
The I.R.S. put a streamlined procedure in place in September for people working abroad who owe less than $1,500 in back taxes on these plans. People who owe more than that will be treated as “higher risk” cases, the I.R.S. said.
There is now a third, voluntary disclosure program in place for people with unreported money offshore. But now that the offshore inquiry has gone beyond traditional tax havens like Switzerland, lawyers said that immigrants and their children were coming under scrutiny. The increased attention on the Middle East and Asia for tax evaders — or terrorist financiers — is raising concern among people who have accounts in their home countries that they never thought to declare in the United States.
Robert J. Kipnees, a partner at the law firm Lowenstein Sandler, said he recently worked with two clients who had accounts at Bank Leumi in Israel, after the bank notified them that the I.R.S. was asking for all of its account information on American citizens.
“It’s not just high-net-worth people,” he said. “You have people who are first- and second-generation Americans whose families left money behind in the old country and they did not know they had an interest in the account.”
PROPER PLANNING Americans who spend their entire career working abroad will probably not be eligible for much, if anything, from Social Security since they cannot contribute to it while working abroad. This puts a premium on saving on their own and creating a realistic financial plan.
Charles Crew, a chemical engineer, and his wife worked in Saudi Arabia for 36 years until they retired to Minneapolis. Mr. Crew, 62, said that when he was around 40 he realized he was not going to be able to count on Social Security. So he began saving through the plans offered by his employer, the oil company Saudi Aramco. “They had a qualified retirement plan and a 401(k) plan, and both were administered by Vanguard in dollars,” he said.
Like many expatriates who became used to living somewhere with far lower costs — and spending like tourists when they returned to the United States — Mr. Crew said he needed to adjust his expectations quickly and stick to the financial plan he had put together.
“You get excited being back and say, ‘I lived away — I should be able to treat myself,’ ” Mr. Crew said. “You can, but you need to look at some of these things and their impact on the long term and do that without the emotional element to it.”
That’s sound advice for anyone.
Posted on 7:16 AM | Categories:

The IRS Sets Its Sights on IRA Abuses

Kelly Greene for the Wall St. Journal writes: The Internal Revenue Service is gearing up for a major "compliance effort" targeting individual retirement accounts. The agency "will begin a careful and data driven approach" for getting IRA owners to avoid making excess contributions or missing withdrawals required after age 70½, according to a March 25 letter sent by an IRS official to Rep. Steve Israel (D., N.Y.).


The initiative will begin between now and the end of the federal government's fiscal year on Sept. 30, according to the letter, signed by Peggy Bogadi, commissioner of the IRS Wage and Investment Division.
The IRS also said it planned to issue "soft notices" to taxpayers before the filing season began to remind them they "may have to take certain actions when they file their returns" and that they could face consequences if they fail to take those actions. It doesn't specify which IRA owners would get the notices. An IRS spokesman declined to comment further.
Contributing more than the maximum $5,500 allowed in 2013, or $6,500 for people who are 50 or older, can result in a tax of 6% of the amount above the limit. And missing a "required minimum distribution," usually starting at age 70½, could result in a tax of 50% of the amount that the account holder should have taken out.
The IRS's compliance effort was prompted by a 2010 audit report by the Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration, the federal tax watchdog. In 2006 and 2007 alone, an estimated $286 million in taxes went uncollected due to missed withdrawals and excess contributions, the report says.
Mr. Israel asked the IRS for an update on its plans after constituents brought the issue to his attention. With two in five U.S. households holding IRAs, "I am concerned that countless Americans may make innocent IRA mistakes and incur penalties they can't afford to pay," he says.
The IRS is trying to increase public awareness of IRA contribution and distribution requirements in a number of ways. It sent a mass email to tax practitioners, published an article in a government newsletter for "businesses and payroll professionals" and plans to submit another article to AARP, the membership group for older Americans, it said in its letter to Mr. Israel.
The letter also says the IRS can waive the extra tax owed for "reasonable error," noting that taxpayers who believe they qualify for relief can submit Form 5329, available at IRS.gov, and attach an explanation.
IRA owners must start taking their required withdrawals from traditional IRAs by April 1 of the year after they turn 70½. Those withdrawals are calculated by dividing the total IRA balance as of Dec. 31 of the year before the owner reached that age by life expectancy, found in a table in IRS Publication 590.
IRA owners can't contribute more than their "earned income" each year, which includes wages, commissions and alimony but not rental-property income, a pension or deferred compensation.
Posted on 7:16 AM | Categories:

7 Obstacles to Rolling an Old 401(k) into a New One

Emily Brandon for US News & World Report writes: When you leave a job, you have four options for your 401(k) plan balance: leave the money in your old 401(k) plan, move it to your new employer’s 401(k) plan, roll it over to an IRA, or cash out the 401(k) balance. The last option will trigger income tax, and if you are under age 55 when you leave the job, an early withdrawal penalty. However, a recent U.S. Government Accountability Office report found that many workers are discouraged from both leaving money in the old 401(k) plan and rolling it over into their new employer’s 401(k) plan. Many departing employees are also aggressively marketed IRAs, and actively persuaded to leave the 401(k) system.


“Participants can be easily steered towards IRAs given the number of administrative obstacles and disincentives to staying in the plan environment and the pervasive marketing of IRAs by 401(k) service providers and IRA providers generally,” according to the GAO report. “Rolling over to an IRA can be a reasonable choice for many participants and, given the amount of money in IRAs, many individuals and former 401(k) plan participants appear satisfied with that option. But other options, such as staying in their current plan or rolling over into their new employers’ plans, may also be viable alternatives and could even be better options depending on an individual’s unique circumstances.” Here’s why it’s difficult to keep your money in the 401(k) system:

Disincentives to stay in your old 401(k) plan. Plan administrators are not always required to allow former employees to leave funds in the 401(k) plan if the balance is less than $5,000 or if the participant is over age 62 or the normal retirement age. Some plans automatically distribute 401(k) balances under $5,000 to departing employees. Roughly 60 percent of plans are ambivalent about or even averse to keeping former employees in the plan, according to the GAO analysis of surveys of plan sponsors and asset managers. Plan sponsors who do not want former employees to leave money in their plans often cite the administrative burdens, costs, legal liability and not wanting the fiduciary duty to former employees. Some plans even charge higher or additional fees to former employees, restrict their ability to manage their savings or take a loan from the plan and limit distribution options. Perhaps because of these restrictions, most people eventually withdraw their money from the old 401(k) plan. Among retirement account participants age 60 and over who left their jobs in 2004, about 50 percent of their plan savings remained in the employer plan 1 year after separating, but only about 20 percent of their 401(k) savings was still in the plan 5 years after leaving the job, according to industry data obtained by GAO.

401(k) rollover waiting periods. 401(k) plans are not required to accept rollovers, so workers must contact the new plan’s administrator to determine if a rollover into the new 401(k) plan will be possible. And even if a rollover is allowed, 401(k) plans may have waiting periods before processing a new employee’s rollover, which vary by plan and can last weeks or months. The delay could leave participants uncertain about the status of their retirement savings.

Complex 401(k) verifications. 401(k) plans may require a lengthy verification process for rollover funds to ensure they are tax-qualified. The plan sponsor might request verification forms from the previous plan that individuals must get their former employer to complete and return. One plan sponsor told the GAO that only 10 to 15 percent of participants who leave the plan move their savings to a new employer’s plan because of barriers in the process, including many paper forms and the involvement of both plan administrators. “That difficulty may discourage participants from keeping their savings in the plan environment, which generally has lower fees, better comparative information, and ERISA plan fiduciaries required to select and monitor reasonable investment options,” GAO found.

Lengthy paperwork requirements. There is no standardized 401(k) distribution paperwork, and many plans use different distribution forms. GAO reviewed 14 packets of sample distribution materials and found that they ranged from single documents of a few pages to multiple documents exceeding 15 pages in total. And more than half of the packets did not include a distribution request form, when means participants would need to contact their plans or service providers to request the necessary form.

Excessive processing time. 401(k) plans are not required to process distribution requests in a specified time frame. And if the plan participant is requesting that the money be transferred to another service provider, there is little incentive to process these requests expeditiously.

Potential to trigger fees and taxes. Whenever you move money from one retirement account to another, it’s best to ask the 401(k) plan sponsor to directly transfer the money to the new financial institution. If the distribution check is made out to the 401(k) participant, 20 percent of the account balance will be withheld for income tax. And if the entire account balance, including the withheld 20 percent, is not deposited into a new retirement account within 60 days, it is considered a withdrawal. The former employee will then become responsible for paying income tax and, if under age 55, a 10 percent early withdrawal penalty on any amount not rolled over. For example, let’s say you have $50,000 in your 401(k), and your former employer writes you a check for $40,000. If you only deposit the $40,000 in a new 401(k) or IRA, the $10,000 will be counted as income and taxes and the early withdrawal penalty may be applied.

Pervasive marketing of IRAs. Rollovers are the largest source of contributions to IRAs. Between 1996 and 2008, over 90 percent of traditional IRA deposits came from rollovers primarily from workplace retirement plans, according to the Investment Company Institute. Many 401(k) service providers aggressively market their IRA plans to departing employees. Educational materials given to 401(k) participants often include their firms’ IRA products as examples, and call center representatives sometimes get financial incentives when plan participants roll their money over into the company’s IRA products, even when they might not serve the participant’s best interest.

A GAO investigator phoned 30 401(k) plan service providers, posing as someone about to start a new job and potentially join a new employer’s 401(k) plan. Many service provider representatives encouraged him to roll his plan savings to an IRA instead of the new plan without specific knowledge of his financial circumstances (11), brought up the fact that IRAs have more investment options than 401(k) plans (16) and raised doubts about the caller’s ability to roll his money over to a new 401(k) plan (12). IRA providers often offer workers assistance with the rollover process and help with the paperwork. Some financial institutions advertise that someone could roll money over to their IRA in 15 minutes or less and even offer sign up bonuses ranging from $50 to $2,500, depending on the individual’s amount of savings. 

When deciding whether to leave your retirement savings in a former employer’s 401(k) plan or roll it over to an IRA or new 401(k) plan it’s important to compare all three plans based on their merits, not which requires the least paperwork. Take a look at the investment options and the fees charged in each account, and make a decision based on which account will best meet your long-term retirement investing needs. Although waiting periods and processing time can be a hassle, don’t let that jeopardize what will ultimately be best for your retirement security.
Posted on 7:15 AM | Categories:

The Number-One Mistake Investors Make During Tax Season / Advice From "GoodApril" (online tax planning solution for individual American taxpayers)

Benzinga for Nasdaq.com writes: There are only 10 more days for Americans to pay their taxes. Those who haven't paid may be starting to scramble, turning to H&R Block (NYSE: HRB ) for last-minute assistance. Others may be choosing to file their own taxes with the help of Intuit's (NASDAQ: INTU ) TurboTax.  Either way, GoodApril founders Benny Joseph and Mitchell Fox told Benzinga that there is one mistake investors should avoid making.

"Probably the number-one mistake is, for investors, not harvesting capital losses from their brokerage accounts," said Fox. "If you made $5,000 in gains this last year that are sitting on top of a few losers, you're doing yourself a disservice to not recognize that loss and reinvest and make a new strategy for the year ahead. Those losses that you recognized offset your income directly and are probably the biggest single thing that someone can use to pay less in taxes -- assuming that they are an active investor."

Fox and Joseph are not accountants, but they founded GoodApril with the goal of helping others save money on their taxes. They enlisted in the help of Claudia Hill (a nationally recognized tax professional) to build and refine GoodApril's tax planning solution.
"GoodApril is really trying to reinvent the way that Americans plan for and file their taxes," said Fox. "There's a huge gap between when you file and the next time you file. Most people don't have any type of advice or suggestions for how they could improve their situation year over year."

GoodApril aims to prepare taxpayers by encouraging them to upload their tax returns to the site.

"What we do is analyze that tax return," Fox explained. "We run our algorithms. We also see what new tax rules have been passed as a result of Obamacare and the Fiscal Cliff, and how this is going to affect you, so that next year you have an idea of what to expect."   While anyone can use the service, Joseph said that the majority of GoodApril's customers are those who handle their own taxes.

"Most people are TurboTax customers," he said. "I think the impression we have after speaking to a number of them is that they're looking for a way to be a little bit more confident that they're handling their taxes appropriately, that they're not missing out on big savings opportunities, and they don't have the benefit of an accountant to ask that question to. It's more of a financial do-it-yourselfer."

GoodApril's service is currently free. The company has found that some individuals may be willing to pay for its service (or additional services) in the future, but it fully intends to continue offering a free version for everyone else.  Instead of relying on its users for revenue, GoodApril is forming a number of lead generation partnerships.

"There's a company we worked with called Shoebox that helps customers keep track of their tax receipts," said Joseph. "We expect to increase the number of lead generation partnerships that we work on." 
Posted on 7:15 AM | Categories:

Minimizing a Wealthy Client's Tax Liability

Austin Kilham for the Wall St. Journal writes: The 66-year-old widow had been a client of adviser Jay Wertz since her husband died in 2007, leaving her with had an estate worth $30 million.  Since then, one of her major goals was to minimize the tax liability on her estate and gift as much as possible to her four children while she was still alive.  "All the good investment management in the world doesn't make sense if it's not integrated with effective estate planning," says Mr. Wertz, director of Wealth Advisory Services at Cincinnati-based Johnson Investment Counsel Inc., which manages $6.5 billion for 3,200 clients.


Mr. Wertz says that upon his client's death, the tax liability against the estate would have been nearly $10 million. Then, after the market crash of 2008, Mr. Wertz saw a way to greatly reduce that burden by using zeroed-out grantor annuity trusts (GRATs).
GRATs allow an individual to gift assets to a trust with a set term, which then pays an annual annuity based on an Internal Revenue Service-set interest rate over the life of the trust. If the assets appreciate at the end of the term the grantor will have received back the equivalent of his or her initial gift, plus interest, thus eliminating any taxable gift for the trust's beneficiaries. However, anything left in the GRAT after the annuity payments can be left to the trust's beneficiaries tax free. If the assets don't appreciate, they revert back to the grantor's estate.
Mr. Wertz notes timing makes all the difference with GRATs: When working with this widow in February 2009, the interest rate for a GRAT was 2%. And market losses in the widow's portfolio made it likely she could grant assets that had a strong chance of appreciating at a higher rate than that--leaving a tidy tax-free sum for her children.
So Mr. Wertz advised the widow to place about $2 million worth of depressed securities in a two-year GRAT and just over $3 million in depressed securities in the three-year GRAT. "People were hoarding all the assets they could get their hands on because they were afraid the world was ending, but the world didn't end, and when the assets sprang back, we were able to easily meet the required annuity payments," he says.
That's exactly what happened for the widow. With the market's rebound over the next few years, her two-year GRAT generated a return of $840,000. Even after the required annuity payments, there was more than $780,000 left in the trust that could be passed tax-free to her children. The three-year GRAT generated a $1.9 million return. After annual annuity there was $1.7 million left over.
"The beauty of this was the client's children were able to unexpectedly receive a couple million dollars that they otherwise would have had to wait until their mother's passing to receive," says Mr. Wertz.
The client was so pleased she decided to use this technique again. Mr. Wertz set up two GRATS for her that will expire later in 2013 and 2015. "This wasn't so much of a stroke of planning genius as it was good integration of wealth management and estate planning," he says.
Posted on 7:15 AM | Categories:

Accounting services and technology consultancy to Shift Small Business Accounting Clients to Xero

Seth Fineberg for AccountingToday.com writes: Accounting services and technology consultancy Armanino has selected to move its small business outsourcing clients from their current accounting platforms to Xero, making them the largest firm thus far to do so. Xero has been actively targeting U.S. accounting firms to use and recommend the product since establishing a base here nearly two years ago, however the majority of firms have admittedly been small firms and solo practices.
“There are a number of top 200 firms moving along the path, but I think more will follow once they see significant firms follow on,” said Xero U.S. president Jamie Sutherland. “[Xero] really applies to all segments of the market, this is core to what we do; we design tools for accounting professionals to manage their own practice but also for the small businesses to understand their finances. This move shows the software has matured to where the largest private firm in California is moving their accounting practice to Xero. We’ve seen this in other markets, but [firms] here are getting it now.”
“We evaluated the small business accounting alternatives and Xero was a clear winner for our outsource solutions division,” said Todd Peterson, director and practice leader of Armanino’s financial management outsourced solutions. “With Xero’s anytime, anywhere accessibility, we can work with clients more efficiently and give them better visibility and control with their finances.”Armanino, which ranked 29 in the 2013 Accounting Today Top 100 firms report, had been servicing most of the small business clients in its outsourced accounting business on other accounting platforms including QuickBooks and Sage 50, however upon evaluation decided it will begin transitioning those clients to Xero where it makes sense.  
The firm is also an Intacct partner, reselling the product and utilizing it for some accounting work, and while it will continue to do so Xero is likely the fit for most of its small business outsourcing clients.
“Our partnership with Intacct has never been stronger and we’ve even moved some clients with a larger accounting department to the product. Where Xero comes in is when clients are on products like QuickBooks or Sage 50, where the customer has bought software and asked us to do the books and we kept versions of whatever they were on at our office. It just wasn’t collaborative,” said partner-in-charge of Armanino’s technology consulting practice Tom Mescall. “To the extent a client is larger and more complex, Intacct most likely will be the choice, but in 80 percent of the cases where there are small business accounting needs Xero will be the best fit.”


Posted on 7:14 AM | Categories:

Study Claims U.S. Individual Taxes Compare Well Within Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) countries.


Mike Godfrey for  Tax-News.com writes:  In notes issued by the Tax Policy Center (TPC) of the Urban Institute and Brookings Institution, it is calculated that, even with the recent increases, individual income tax rates in the United States compare favorably with those in other major Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) countries.


The TPC points out that, while discussions on the effect of taxes on international competitiveness usually focus on corporate income tax rates, individual income tax rates may also affect a country's (or state's) ability to compete for workers. In the US, the competition issue has been mentioned in recent reports that golfer Phil Mickelson was planning to flee the higher California state income tax rates.

It is noted that the new 39.6% federal individual income tax rate (after the "fiscal cliff" Congressional agreement over the end of last year), combined with California's new 13.3% top state rate, have pushed the top combined US rate on wages to 47.6% for 2013, even though state income taxes are deductible for federal income tax purposes. This is higher than at any time since the top federal rate dropped below 50% in the mid-1980s.

The TPC calculates that recent rate increases will likely move the US higher than the rank of 20th place among the 34 OECD countries that it held in 2012. 2013's 47.6% rate would have ranked it in 17th place last year. However, this year's US rate is only 0.1% higher than the 2012 rates of the two countries (Australia and Germany) that rank just above it.
Furthermore, countries besides the US could have higher (or lower) rates in 2013 than in 2012. The US has previously ranked higher than 17th – it was 15th in 2002 and 16th in both 2008 and 2009. The TPC confirmed that it fell to 20th in 2010 only because several countries (Greece, Iceland, Ireland and the United Kingdom) raised their top rates.

It is therefore concluded that, even with its recent rate increases, US individual income tax rates compare favorably among major OECD countries, particularly as measured against European countries such as Denmark, Sweden, Belgium and the Netherlands, and for the majority of Americans who live in states with top income tax rates lower than California's or with no state income tax at all.

While most business tax receipts have come from a relatively small number of C corporations subject to the corporate income tax (because they are larger), the use of other organizational forms allowing businesses to pass their profits through to their owners, where they are subject to the individual income tax has grown, such that by 2007 they represented 94% of firms and accounted for 38% of business tax receipts.

Posted on 7:14 AM | Categories:

Wealthy Taxpayers Draw More IRS Scrutiny

Arden Dale for the Wall St. Journal writes: The Internal Revenue Service audits the very rich more than the merely rich, and draws that line at $10 million.  Taxpayers who report $10 million or more of adjusted gross income have raised more red flags with the tax agency than other, less wealthy, filers in recent years. New data from the IRS underscores this trend. For financial advisers who work with the $10 million and over set, audits are a fact of life that must be discussed upfront. The reporting of investments, charitable contributions or sales of businesses are expected to draw greater scrutiny from the IRS.


"When we talk about these things, we talk in the context of 'Let's assume you are going be audited,'" said Michael Krol, a planner at Waldron Wealth Management, an advisory firm in Pittsburgh with $1.1 billion under management.
The 2012 IRS Data Book, published in March, said the agency audited 27.37% of individual tax returns with AGI over $10 million filed in calendar year 2011. In contrast, it audited only 8.9% of returns with AGI between $1 million and $5 million, and 3.57% with AGI between $500,000 and $1 million.
The $10 million threshold makes sense to Mark Blumenthal, a tax partner and leader of the Family Office Service Group in the Chicago office of Plante Moran, an accounting and business advisory firm.
Taxpayers who fall into that income category tend to file more complicated returns. They are likely to have a closely held business or portfolio of hedge funds, partnerships or other complicated investments as well as large deductions--increasing the likelihood of tax-return errors.
"If you want to buy CDs, even in big numbers, you won't necessarily be audited, but if it's alternative investments including private equity or hedge funds, it's not 'if,' it's 'when,'" Mr. Blumenthal said.
Form 1040, the individual tax return, can require more than 30 supporting attachments--from Schedule A for itemized deductions to Form 4562 for depreciation and amortization of business and other property, to Form 8582 to report passive losses from business. When the dollar amounts are larger, naturally the possibility of errors goes up as well.
The IRS tends to audit returns that show unusual events, like the sale of a business or a large charitable contribution.
The agency recently asked a client of Mr. Blumenthal to show proof of a big charity gift that involved investments that generated Forms K-1. These tax documents are often hard to deal with; they can run to 15 or 16 pages, and must be reported in several places on a tax return. In this case, good record-keeping impressed the IRS agent and the client didn't owe any extra tax.
Well-organized and well-documented records are the key to surviving an audit, said James H. Guarino, an accountant and certified financial planner at MFA--Moody, Famiglietti & Andronico LLP in Tewksbury, Mass.
One has to be able to prove that each item on the return was reported correctly. It is foolish to expect the IRS to accept the explanation that, say, a deduction is the same as last year, without documents to prove that, Mr. Guarino said.
Advisers say being upfront about the prospect of an audit helps clients cope when the IRS does call. But that doesn't make the process easy.
"When people get audited, they get nervous," Mr. Blumenthal said. "That's human nature."
Posted on 7:14 AM | Categories:

Six Tips on Making Estimated IRS Tax Payments


Some taxpayers may need to make estimated tax payments during the year. The type of income you receive determines whether you must pay estimated taxes. Here are six tips from the IRS about making estimated tax payments.

1. If you do not have taxes withheld from your income, you may need to make estimated tax payments. This may apply if you have income such as self-employment, interest, dividends or capital gains. It could also apply if you do not have enough taxes withheld from your wages. If you are required to pay estimated taxes during the year, you should make these payments to avoid a penalty.

2. Generally, you may need to pay estimated taxes in 2013 if you expect to owe $1,000 or more in taxes when you file your federal tax return. Other rules apply, and special rules apply to farmers and fishermen.

3. When figuring the amount of your estimated taxes, you should estimate the amount of income you expect to receive for the year. You should also include any tax deductions and credits that you will be eligible to claim. Be aware that life changes, such as a change in marital status or a child born during the year can affect your taxes. Try to make your estimates as accurate as possible.

4. You normally make estimated tax payments four times a year. The dates that apply to most people are April 15, June 17 and Sept. 16 in 2013, and Jan. 15, 2014.

5. You should use Form 1040-ES, Estimated Tax for Individuals, to figure your estimated tax.

6. You may pay online or by phone. You may also pay by check or money order, or by credit or debit card. You’ll find more information about your payment options in the Form 1040-ES instructions. Also, check out the Electronic Payment Options Home Page at IRS.gov. If you mail your payments to the IRS, you should use the payment vouchers that come with Form 1040-ES.

For more information about estimated taxes, see Publication 505, Tax Withholding and Estimated Tax. Forms and publications are available on IRS.gov or by calling 800-TAX-FORM (800-829-3676).

Additional IRS Resources:
Posted on 7:13 AM | Categories:

Personal Trainer Tax Deductions

Nola Moore for Demand Media writes: As a personal trainer, you likely have many eligible tax deductions, whether you work for someone else, such as a fitness club, or for yourself. By keeping careful records of your unreimbursed business expenses, you may be able to lower your taxable income and your overall tax bill.

EQUIPMENT

As a fitness professional, you may deduct the cost of any training equipment you use with your clients, provided you use it exclusively for your business. This means that you cannot deduct the cost of your home workout equipment or the cost of your fitness clothing, unless you have a specific work uniform required by your employer.

EDUCATION AND CERTIFICATIONS

You can deduct the cost of your certifications and continuing education, as well as any books or supplies required to obtain them. In addition, if you travel to conferences or seminars, you can deduct your travel and lodging expenses and half the cost of your business-related meals while at the event. You may also write off the costs of any professional subscriptions and memberships to journals, websites and associations that you use to keep up-to-date on fitness information.

INSURANCE AND OTHER PROFESSIONAL EXPENSES

If you purchase your own liability insurance, that cost is a business expense and is tax-deductible. In addition, if you are self-employed, you may be able to deduct all or part of the cost of your health insurance. Any legal fees you incur as part of your business are deductible, as is the cost to hire a professional tax preparer.

GENERAL BUSINESS EXPENSES

If you must drive between multiple health clubs during the day, you can deduct the cost of those trips from taxes. You may also deduct the cost of your business cards, website and other promotional materials. Office supplies and equipment, such as computers, printers, paper and so on, are also deductible. If you have supplies or equipment that you use for both business and personal tasks, you may deduct the percentage of the cost that is equivalent to your work use.

ADDITIONAL DEDUCTIONS AND RESTRICTIONS

If you are self-employed, you may be eligible for additional retirement savings benefits -- and a resulting tax deduction -- through a SEP IRA, SIMPLE IRA or individual 401(k) plan. Even if you are employed by someone else, your traditional IRA contributions may be tax-deductible.

NOTES AND RESTRICTIONS

To claim these types of expenses, you must itemize your deductions and they -- along with any other deductions you take -- must be greater than the standard deduction to lower your tax obligation. In addition, if you are not self-employed, most work-related deductions are "miscellaneous" deductions and must exceed 2 percent of your adjusted gross income before you can begin to deduct them. Review IRS Publication 535 and consult a professional tax preparer to ensure you're getting all your eligible deductions.

Posted on 7:13 AM | Categories:

In 2009 my wife and I rolled over our traditional IRA into an annuity IRA. The base cost of the annuity lost over $19,000 each. How do we claim this loss on our income tax?

Knoxville, TN CPA Andy Ellis answers questions for knoxnews.com and writes: A: The tax consequences from investing in annuity contracts can be very difficult to navigate. I am sorry to hear that you have lost money on these investments. You will pay less in tax as a result of these losses, but it may not feel like it. There is no way to deduct these losses on your 2012 income tax return. Unless the contracts have been sold, you have unrealized losses. Unrealized losses cannot be deducted until the investment is actually sold or otherwise disposed of. In this case, you will never be able to deduct the losses. If these annuities were funded with pretax dollars that were originally invested in your traditional IRAs, your benefit will be recognized when you start receiving payments from the annuity contracts. You will pay less tax because the payments you will receive will be smaller. The opposite would also be the same. If these annuities would have increased in value, you would pay more tax because the eventual larger distributions would be taxable. So, you do get some tax benefit from these losses, but there is nowhere to claim it this year.

Another.....


Q: I recently inherited my parents’ house. Will I have to pay income tax on the proceeds when I sell it? If so, how where do I report it. It was appraised for probate.  
A: You may or may not have to pay income tax on the proceeds from the sale of this inherited property. You will not have to pay income tax simply for inheriting the house, though. Any “inheritance” tax due on a large estate is paid by the estate. So, the tax is already taken care of before the inheriting taxpayer receives the property. The tax due on the proceeds will depend on whether or not you have a capital gain or loss on the sale. You will need to start with the amount of proceeds realized from the sale. You are allowed to deduct your inherited basis in the property, any additional money invested into the property during the time you owned it, and any expenses incurred with selling the property. You may owe tax if the result is a capital gain. If the result is a capital loss, you may have a deduction to take.
Posted on 7:13 AM | Categories:

Tax Advantages of Incorporation


E.J. Dealy, CEO, The Company Corporation for Fox Business writes: By incorporating their firms, business owners create a separate legal structure that helps shield their personal assets from judgments against the company. However, companies that incorporate are taxed differently. A C-corporation pays its share of employment taxes and withholds certain required income and employment taxes from employees' salaries.  (If you're a sole proprietor, you probably pay periodic self-employment taxes on your entire share of your company's profits.)





A C-Corp has perpetual existence, meaning that the firm will continue even if the owner/founder dies or leaves, and adds credibility to a firm, thereby making it easier to attract investment from angel investors, venture capitalists and others through the sale of stock. C-Corps can reward employees by issuing stock options to them; people tend to work harder for a firm if they feel part of the ownership.

The C Corporation structure does have its drawbacks. For instance, a firm's profits are taxed when earned and taxed again when distributed as shareholders' dividends in what is known as "double taxation."  (Shareholders cannot deduct corporate losses, as is the case with a limited partnership or an LLC.)  A C-Corp must file quarterly taxes with the IRS, rather than annually, which is the case for an S Corporation.





S Corporations
Companies that meet certain requirements can elect to have S-Corp status. This federal tax status enables them to "pass through" their taxable income or losses to owners/investors in the business, according to their ownership stake.  (By default, companies that do not specify a tax status with the IRS are considered to be C Corporations, which means that they will be taxed as such unless they register as an S-corp.)

By choosing S-Corp status, a firm can eliminate the disadvantage of "double taxation" of corporate income and shareholder dividends. The S-Corp format also offers limited liability for company directors, officers, shareholders, and employees; investment opportunities through the sale of shares of stock; perpetual existence and a once-a-year tax filing requirement (vs. quarterly for a C-Corp).

The example below illustrates the tax advantage of electing for S-Corp status over sole proprietorship: 


Not Incorporated: John, a sole proprietor (not incorporated), has a net income of $100,000. He pays $15,300 in self-employment taxes.


$15,300
Incorporated: John forms an S-corporation. He pays himself a reasonable salary of $60,000 and pays the other $40,000 as a shareholder dividend.  John pays Social Security and Medicare taxes only on his salary, for a total of $9,180.


$9,180
* By incorporating, John saves:
$6,120
* Ask your accountant if this strategy will reduce your self-employment taxes.


Many types of professionals -- doctors, lawyers, architects, accountants, engineers, and public relations people, for instance -- start their companies as sole practitioners.  However, as the company's success grows, partners and additional workers typically join.  At that point, the company must expand and change its business format. 

As Tax Day approaches on April 15, it is too late to change business format for 2012 earnings.  However, one can consider changing status in 2013.  My advice is to check with an attorney or a tax consultant to determine if it is the right move for your business.
Posted on 7:13 AM | Categories: