Saturday, July 6, 2013

High-Impact Tax Breaks

Laura Sanuders for the Wall St Journal writes: The year is half over. So it's time to make sure you are making your best tax moves for 2013.


"People need to be proactive," says Janet Hagy, a certified public accountant in Austin, Texas. "By December, it may be too late."
Income and estate taxes underwent seismic shifts in January, rearranging the landscape for many taxpayers. Wealthy Americans in particular are facing higher tax rates on ordinary and investment income.
That makes it all the more important to review Uncle Sam's highest-impact tax breaks, such as donations of appreciated assets, tax-free exchanges and capital-loss harvesting.
Unlike obvious moves, such as contributing to an individual retirement account or a 401(k) plan, these strategies require a higher degree of awareness and active planning. "It's easy to write a check to charity," says Jeffrey Porter, a CPA in Huntington, W.Va., "but often it's a better idea to give stock that has risen in value."
Some investors already have begun to take advantage of these moves. Scott Saunders, an investment real estate specialist at Asset Preservation in Palmer Lake, Colo., says he has seen a spike in tax-deferred "like-kind" exchanges of residential rental and commercial real estate in the past six months.
In one case, an investor with a $1 million property in Brooklyn, N.Y., exchanged it for two in upstate New York and a third in Queens, N.Y., instead of selling outright. The move deferred federal tax of about $225,000, plus state taxes, Mr. Saunders says.
"People are surprised at how much the new taxes will take, so they're looking for alternatives," he adds (see the Family Value column on page B8 for a tax strategy using trusts).
Not all high-impact breaks are for the wealthy. Any homeowner can benefit from a provision allowing taxpayers to pocket tax-free income from renting a residence for as long as two weeks, and low-bracket taxpayers can pay zero tax on long-term capital gains.
Other important moves can help minimize estate, gift and inheritance taxes. This might seem like a less-urgent task now, since Congress approved in January a generous gift-and-estate tax exemption of $5.25 million per individual that is indexed to inflation. But there already is a proposal to scale back the exemption to $3.5 million.
What's more, 20 states and the District of Columbia have their own estate or inheritance taxes, according to tax publisher CCH, a unit of Wolters Kluwer WTKWY +0.33% . Many of them have exemptions far below the federal level: $1 million in Minnesota, Massachusetts, Maryland and New York, for example, and $675,000 in New Jersey.
Here are some tax strategies that could deliver big benefits.
Capital-loss harvesting. This break—beloved by the superrich, including Mitt Romney and Michael Bloomberg—can be helpful for all investors with taxable accounts. Losses from one investment can be used to offset gains on another. A loss on the sale of stock can be applied against gains on the sale of real estate, for example. Up to $3,000 a year can also be deducted against ordinary income such as wages.
After a sale, capital losses "carry forward" until the investor has gains to offset. Smart taxpayers sold losing assets during the 2008 financial crisis and then bought them back, capturing the losses for use against future gains.
Be careful, though, to avoid a "wash sale," which occurs when you buy shares 30 days before or after selling losing shares of the same investment. It diminishes the strategy's benefits.
Capital-gains harvesting. Although the total tax rate on long-term investment gains rose sharply this year for top-bracket taxpayers—to nearly 25% from 15% in 2012—the rate on gains for low-bracket investors is still zero.
The rate is available to married couples with taxable income below $72,500 this year ($36,200 for singles), which doesn't include tax-free municipal-bond income. Taxpayers who qualify can sell appreciated assets (such as shares) to "scrub" gains and lower future tax bills.
For example, a couple with $50,000 of taxable income could take up to $22,500 of profits on stock tax-free and then buy back the shares immediately. (Sales at a gain aren't subject to wash-sale rules.)
The couple still owns the stock, but future gains will be measured from a higher starting point, or "cost basis," so future taxes will be lower.
Like-kind exchanges. In this strategy, investors trade one investment for another without owing federal tax. Instead, tax is deferred until the replacement asset is sold. If the taxpayer holds the asset until death, no tax might ever be due (see "Step-up at death" below).
The rules are more restrictive than those on capital losses, however, and getting expert help is a good idea.
According to Mr. Saunders, most types of investment real estate can be traded for other real estate (other than a residence), but they can't be traded for personal property—as in a building for art. Still, certain investment collectibles can be traded for one another, he says.
Two-week home rentals. The income from renting a residence for less than 15 days is tax-free, and it doesn't have to be reported on your tax return. This is a boon for people living near the site of the Super Bowl or another major sports event, and it also works for owners of second homes who want to rent short-term.
The tax-free perk is often called the "Masters' provision," because homeowners use it during the famed golf tournament in Augusta, Ga.
"Even people with modest homes get a boost," often earning between 15% and 25% of a year's mortgage payments, says Bill Woodward, a CPA at the Elliott Davis firm in Augusta. Many homeowners pocket from $6,000 to $30,000, he adds.
Home-sale benefit. As often as every two years, taxpayers can sell a principal residence (not a second home) and the profit will be tax-free—up to $500,000 for married couples or $250,000 for singles. A surviving spouse gets the full $500,000 break for up to two years after a spouse's death.
Because the profit doesn't include the purchase price or improvements, most home sales in most areas will be tax-free. For more information, see IRS Publication 523.
Charitable donations of appreciated assets. The tax code offers a great boon to philanthropic Americans. Within certain limits, taxpayers who donate appreciated assets to charities can deduct the fair-market value of the gift and skip paying capital-gains tax on the appreciation.
For example, say a taxpayer wants to give $1,000 to her college. If instead of cash she gives $1,000 of stock that she bought for $500, she won't owe tax on $500 of profit but can take a deduction for the full $1,000.
Charitable IRA rollover. Individual retirement account owners who are at least 70½ years old are allowed to donate as much as $100,000 of account assets directly to one or more qualified charities and count the gift as part of their required annual withdrawal.
While the taxpayer doesn't get a deduction for the gift, neither does it count as income. This popular move also can help reduce a taxpayer's adjusted gross income, which in turn can help minimize Medicare premiums or taxes on Social Security benefits.
Solo defined-benefit pension plan. With this strategy, taxpayers can deduct contributions of tens of thousands of dollars or more to a tax-sheltered retirement plan—as long as they are in the fortunate position of having their own consulting firms or other solo business, plus a steady stream of income they don't need to tap immediately.
The rules are especially generous to older workers, who often can set aside large sums to reach a goal quickly. But the plans, which must be custom-designed, aren't simple. Lisa Germano, president of Actuarial Benefits & Design in Midlothian, Va., estimates the setup cost of a solo plan at about $3,000.
529 plans. These popular college-savings accounts can help save on both income and estate taxes. There isn't a federal tax deduction for money going in, but asset growth and withdrawals are tax-free if used for qualified education costs.
Plans are sponsored by U.S. states, some of which give a state tax deduction for contributions. Some have lower fees and better investment options than others, so choose carefully.
Three features make 529 plans especially attractive. First, owners can change beneficiaries, so if one child doesn't need all the money, a relative can use it. In addition, owners can bunch up to five years' worth of $14,000 tax-free gifts to the plans. President Barack Obama and his wife Michelle used this break several years ago.
Finally, owners such as grandparents who don't want to owe estate taxes but also worry they might have unexpected costs, such as for health care, have a useful option. Although 529 contributions remove assets from an estate, the giver can take back account assets if the money is needed.
Annual gifts of $14,000. The law allows any taxpayer to give anyone else—a neighbor, friend or relative, say—up to $14,000 a year without owing federal gift tax. Above that, the gift is subtracted from an individual's lifetime gift-and-estate tax exemption, now $5.25 million.
The gifts remove assets from the giver's estate, and the total can add up over time. A husband and wife with three married children and six grandchildren, for example, could shift $336,000 a year to family members using this benefit.
This provision can be used to move assets other than cash, such as fractional shares of a business, but expert help is recommended in such cases.
Gifts of tuition or medical care. Taxpayers don't owe federal gift tax on amounts paid for tuition or medical care for another person. Given the growth in medical and education costs, such gifts can also remove large amounts from a taxable estate. Remember, however, that payment must be made directly to the provider.
"Step-up" at death. Under current law, taxpayers don't owe capital-gains tax on assets held at death. Instead, the assets are stepped up to their current value and become part of the taxpayer's estate, with no income tax due on the profits.
The upshot is that people planning estates should look carefully at their gains in various assets.
The taxable profit on a $100 share of stock that was bought for $10 will be $90 if it is sold shortly before death, but zero if it is held till death. There might be no estate tax either, given the current exemption of $5.25 million per individual.
As noted earlier, this benefit can be combined with techniques such as the like-kind exchange to eliminate tax altogether.
Estate-tax exemption portability. This provision, made permanent in January, allows a spouse's estate to transfer to the survivor the unused portion of the lifetime gift-and-estate tax exemption.
So if a wife dies leaving an estate of $500,000, her husband could receive her unused $4.75 million exemption and add it to his own $5.25 million one, for a total $10 million future exemption. But to take advantage of this provision, the executor must file an estate-tax return.
What if the survivor has assets far below the total exemption? File a return to preserve it anyway, says Mr. Porter, the West Virginia CPA. "Who knows?" he says. "You might win the lottery or receive an inheritance."
Posted on 8:18 AM | Categories:

Extreme Weather Serves Up Important Reminders To Taxpayers

Kelly Phillips Erb for Forbes writes: I’ve spent much of this week de-icking my house. I’ve bailed water out of my basement, wiped mildew off of furniture and emptied the dehumidifier more times than I care to count. I’m hardly alone: it’s been a wet one on the east coast. Heavy rains have been reported this summer from Maine to Florida.And in my neck of the woods, June 2013 was officially the wettest June in 142 years of record-keeping in Philadelphia. As of last week’s deluge, the rain gauge at Philadelphia International Airport indicated a June total of 10.11 inches.
While my basement flooded last week, I had just experienced the pleasure of dealing with flooding at my law offices two weeks ago. Literally, when it rains, it pours.
When we first moved into the house last fall, my husband claimed a little spot in the basement to use for his home office before being pushed out by the kids when their crafting space took a decidedly messy turn. It was, in hindsight, a good thing since we lost a few clay models of imaginary cities created by the kids but our tax and other important papers were safe and sound in the revised office space upstairs.
Floods and other disasters are a good reminder that tax and important papers should always be stored in a safe place. Like photos and keepsakes, these are the things you own that can be extremely difficult to replace. While you can always order tax transcripts and tax histories from the Internal Revenue Service in a pinch, you’re at their mercy as to availability, accuracy and completeness. Additionally, the IRS doesn’t retain supporting documentation, such as receipts and donor letters – that’s your job – and you may need those to substantiate deductions and credits.
Best practices? Keep your documents organized (arranged by year is a good start) and store your documents in a safe place. There is no single “safe place” for records: it’s highly dependent on your own lifestyle. In my case, it’s a mix of keeping records above ground (since we know our new basement is damp) and away from prying eyes and sticky fingers (since we have kids). You’ll want to consider not only dampness but pests, sun bleaching and other nature-related alterations when making decisions about where to store documents. Records should be stored securely but in fairly easy to reach spot: I don’t recommend safe deposit boxes for tax and other business documents because it can be inconvenient to retrieve documents. Locking file cabinets and home safes can be good alternatives.
For personal bank and financial records that I want to be able to access regularly, I use hanging files – easy to organize by color – next to my desktop computer. Medical and educational records (also important for tax purposes) get sorted by individual, filed in separate binders and stored on shelves. Important papers are stashed in a fireproof safe.
My husband has a completely different system for his personal bank and financial records. He stores his working records in files on his desk and then sorts them by month. Those get filed in waterproof storage boxes when he’s finished or in binders, depending on the documents.
We both scan select records and store them electronically. The IRS has accepted scanned receipts since 1997, a policy that was memorialized by Rev. Proc. 97–22 (downloads as a pdf). You need to ensure that your scanned or electronic receipts are as accurate as paper records and you must be able to index, store, preserve, retrieve, and reproduce the records. In other words, you still need to have your records organized and be able to produce them in a hard copy form if needed.
I am a fan of the cloud but I know that many tax and legal professionals are not. If you rely on the cloud for offline storage, be sure that it’s both secure and that there’s a reliable back-up system. You can find plenty of reviews of cloud storage online and I highly recommend that you thoroughly check out a company before committing to storing your financial and tax records on their system.
If you store your records electronically, on your hard drive or in the cloud, there’s no reason to keep your physical receipts so long as you have faith that your electronic system is sufficient.  It’s worth noting that the integrity of the system is on you, and the failure of the system is not a valid excuse for not having accurate records. So choose a system that you trust – and make sure that it works!
Of course, keeping all of those records handy takes up a lot of space. How do you figure out which records to keep and how long to keep them? Here are some tips to get you started:
  1. As a rule, keep your tax records and supporting documentation until the statute of limitations runs for filing returns or filing for refund. For most taxpayers, that means that you’ll want to keep those records for three years following the date of filing or the due date of your tax return, which ever is later (26 USC Sec 501(a)). For example, if you filed your 2012 tax return on Tax Day, April 15, 2013, you’ll want to keep those returns and those records until April 15, 2016.
  2. If you (*cough*) don’t exactly report all of the income that you should report – generally, if you omit more than 25% of the gross income shown on your return – the statute of limitations is extended by statute (26 USC Sec (501)(e)). You’ll want to keep those records for six years.
  3. If you file a clearly fraudulent return or if you don’t file a return at all (26 USC Sec 501(c)), the statute of limitations never actually runs. In that event, you’ll want to hold onto your records, well, for forever. Keep in mind that the rules for failing to file a return doesn’t apply to income tax returns only: it includes other tax returns such as payroll tax returns and the infamous FBAR for offshore accounts (see this post for more information about FBAR reporting).
  4. Supporting documentation for your tax returns includes not only your forms W-2 and 1099 but also invoices, credit card and other receipts, mileage logs, canceled or substitute checks, proofs of payment, and any other records to support deductions or credits you claim on your return. If you have to obtain special documentation to support deductions or credits – such as appraisals for charitable deductions or casualty losses – you’ll want to keep those records, too. All of those records should be retained for at least as long as the statute of limitations.
  5. If you claim depreciation, amortization, or depletion deductions, you’ll want to keep related records for as long as you own the underlying property. That includes deeds, titles and cost basis records. Similarly, if you claim special deductions and credits, you may need to keep your records a little longer than normal (for example, if you file a claim for a loss from worthless securities or bad debtdeduction, you should keep those records for 7 years).
  6. If you have employees, including household employees, keep your employment tax records for at least four years after the date that payroll taxes become due or is paid, whichever is later. This should include forms W-2 and W-4, as well as related pay information including benefit forms. If you never filed payroll tax returns, there’s no statute (see above) so you’ll want to keep pay information forever.
  7. Increasingly, it’s not uncommon to have disputes about who is an employee and who is an independent contractor. If you hire an independent contractor, to be safe, I would retain good records for at least the same four years after the date that payroll taxes would have been due or paid.
  8. Keep in mind that even if records aren’t needed for tax reasons, you may need them for other reasons. Make sure that you check with your mortgage company and tax professionals before throwing out financial and/or tax records.
  9. Finally, do not assume that your tax professional will retain sufficient copies of your records for you. It’s your responsibility to produce documentation to IRS upon request so don’t toss out your information because you assume that you can get them from your accountant or the like. I spend a fair amount of time trying to recover records from accountants and lawyers who have moved, gone out of business or are simply not responsive. Acquiring those records – assuming that they still exist – can be time consuming, frustrating and expensive.
Posted on 8:17 AM | Categories:

Vanguard ETFs - diluted tax efficiency?

At Bogleheads we read:

Vanguard ETFs - diluted tax efficiency?

Postby boggler » Fri Jul 05, 2013 1:25 pm
From http://www.altruistfa.com/etfs.htm:

ETFs may be somewhat more tax efficient than similar conventional index mutual funds. This increased tax-efficiency is in the form of lesser capital gains distributions (which effectively means that an ETF's capital gains tend to be more deferred than a similar mutual fund's would be). The idea that ETFs should have lower capital gains distributions comes from their ability to shed their lowest-basis shares to institutional arbitrageurs through in-kind redemptions. Note that this benefit applies to a much lesser extent to Vanguard's ETFs. Because they exist as a separate share class of conventional mutual funds, any tax benefit a Vanguard ETF generates is shared by investors in the fund's non-ETF shares, thus diluting the beneficial effect for Vanguard ETF share owners.


Is this something to worry about?
boggler
Posts: 318
Joined: 7 Feb 2013

Re: Vanguard ETFs - diluted tax efficiency?

Postby boggler » Fri Jul 05, 2013 1:33 pm
And here's another concern from the same page.

ETFs may not be as tax efficient as you'd like. At present, qualifying dividend distributions from stocks are taxed at a preferentially low tax rate in the United States. One of the requirements to qualify for this low rate is that the stock has been held for at least 60 days. Due to share creation activity, this standard may not be met all the time. Thus, a portion of the dividend income received (and distributed) by the ETF may not qualify for the preferentially low tax rate for qualifying dividends.

Conventional index mutual funds have more control over this than do ETFs, and are therefore more likely to have a higher percentage of their distributed dividends qualify for the preferentially low tax rate.


Never heard of this. Is this valid?
boggler
Posts: 318
Joined: 7 Feb 2013

Re: Vanguard ETFs - diluted tax efficiency?

Postby livesoft » Fri Jul 05, 2013 1:33 pm
Nope.
This information has been prepared without taking into account the Sequestration, investment objectives, financial situation and particular needs of any particular person or company.
livesoft
Posts: 26823
Joined: 1 Mar 2007

Re: Vanguard ETFs - diluted tax efficiency?

Postby boggler » Fri Jul 05, 2013 2:57 pm
livesoft wrote:Nope.


Care to elaborate?
boggler
Posts: 318
Joined: 7 Feb 2013

Re: Vanguard ETFs - diluted tax efficiency?

Postby Majormajor78 » Sat Jul 06, 2013 1:29 am
boggler wrote:From http://www.altruistfa.com/etfs.htm:

ETFs may be somewhat more tax efficient than similar conventional index mutual funds. This increased tax-efficiency is in the form of lesser capital gains distributions (which effectively means that an ETF's capital gains tend to be more deferred than a similar mutual fund's would be). The idea that ETFs should have lower capital gains distributions comes from their ability to shed their lowest-basis shares to institutional arbitrageurs through in-kind redemptions. Note that this benefit applies to a much lesser extent to Vanguard's ETFs. Because they exist as a separate share class of conventional mutual funds, any tax benefit a Vanguard ETF generates is shared by investors in the fund's non-ETF shares, thus diluting the beneficial effect for Vanguard ETF share owners.


Is this something to worry about?

I've heard of this referenced to as the reason why Vanguard pays out less capital gains distributions than it used to. My understanding is that both the ETF owners and mutual fund owners share the benefits of managing the cost basis of the stocks held by the fund. I suppose it is logical for a pure ETF fund to have the potential to take advantage of this more fully but I don't think that is often the case. Market makers and institutional investors most actively arbitrage those ETF's that have sufficiently high volumes so that they can capitalize on any premium or discounts that develop.

For this reason, the funds that could potentially reap the tax benefit of managing their cost basis are the ETF behemoths like Blackrock and Vanguard. I don't believe the majority of boutique ETF's with smaller volumes and fewer arbitrage opportunities will reap the benefit as much as Vanguard. Perhaps Schwab can manage to have both a lower ER and be slightly more tax efficient... I just don't know. I understand the concept but is takes years of data and statistical analysis to declare one superior.
"Oh, M. le Comte, it is only a loss of money which I have sustained... nothing worth mentioning, I assure you."
User avatar
Majormajor78
Posts: 691
Joined: 31 Jan 2011
Location: Chicagoish
Posted on 8:17 AM | Categories:

Paychex, Automatic Data Processing (ADP), Intuit Inc.: Will Investing in These 3 Payroll Stocks Pay Off?

Leo Sun for Motley Fool / Insider Monkey writes: The U.S. labor market has steadily recovered over the past three and a half years, with the unemployment rate declining from 10% at the end of 2009 to 7.6% in June. With more people getting back to work, human resource departments are processing more employee data and paychecks than ever before. Therefore, investors should pay attention to an often overlooked industry that deals with human resources and company payrolls.

Major players in this sector include Paychex, Inc. (NASDAQ:PAYX)Automatic Data Processing (NASDAQ:ADP) and Intuit Inc. (NASDAQ:INTU). Each of these companies focuses on different outsourcing needs for small and large businesses. Let’s take a look at how each has fared over the past few years.

Paychex
Paychex was founded over four decades ago by CEO Tom Golisano, who recognized an untapped market in outsourced payroll services for small businesses. At the time, Golisano was employed for a larger regional payroll processor which only catered to larger businesses.
Despite his previous employer’s doubts, Golisano’s little business idea paid off. Since Paychex’s market debut in 1983, its shares have risen over 17,000%, and the company now generates over $2 billion in annual revenue. Today, Paychex not only offers payroll services, but also services for Time and Labor Management, HR Administration & Compliance, 401 (k) plans, and employee health insurance.
Although Paychex, Inc. (NASDAQ:PAYX) has risen more than 16% over the past twelve months, the stock recently tumbled after its fourth quarter profit and revenue missed analyst estimates. Paychex reported flat earnings growth of $0.34 per share, or $123.5 million, as its revenue grew 6.1% to $551.5 million. Analysts had expected the company to earn $0.37 per share on revenue of $588.0 million.
Paychek’s Payroll Service segment, its larger business, reported 3.5% top-line growth to $382.6 million, while its smaller HR segment reported 12.6% growth to $192.7 million. The company’s view for fiscal 2014 was roughly the same, calling for 3% to 4% growth in the Payroll segment and 9% to 10% growth in the HR segment.
Paychex has stable top and bottom-line growth, along with a hefty 3.6% dividend, but a 5% increase in expenses last quarter caused some concerns. This was primarily caused by a rise in SG&A (selling, general and administrative) expenses incurred during the quarter for investments in product development and new technology.

Automatic Data Processing
Automatic Data Processing (NASDAQ:ADP)A look at Automatic Data Processing (NASDAQ:ADP), which offers similar services to larger companies, also reveals similar trends. Last quarter, the company reported 6% year-on-year profit growth and a 7% gain in revenue to $3.1 billion. Unlike Paychex, however, ADP beat analyst estimates on both the top and bottom lines.
Automatic Data Processing (NASDAQ:ADP) was founded in 1949 and went public in 1978. Its business model is a classic example of the “old way” of outsourcing payroll and HR services prior to Paychex’s arrival. Its business is split into Employer Services (which includes payroll services), PEO (professional employer organization) Services, and Dealer Services (computing services for automobile and heavy equipment dealers).
Employer Services, which comprise the bulk of the company’s top line, reported 6% organic growth to $2.21 billion. For its PEO Services, Automatic Data Processing (NASDAQ:ADP) jointly hires a client company’s employees for tax and insurance purposes, then designates them to perform a multitude of outsourced tasks. This segment reported a 10% increase in revenue to $565.5 million. Its Dealer Services revenue also rose 8% to $460.5 million, as auto and equipment sales rose in the United States.
Automatic Data Processing (NASDAQ:ADP) has grown its top and bottom lines much faster than Paychex over the past three years, primarily due to its client base of larger companies, which were able to continue hiring as smaller businesses floundered. However, ADP’s total expenses rose 7.2%, due to higher operating costs, SG&A expenses and systems development & programming costs. However, these expenses have been spent on upgrading its payment systems to stay competitive in a 21st century workplace. For example, ADP offers a prepaid debit card, which employers can use to directly receive paychecks. Although Automatic Data Processing (NASDAQ:ADP)’s dividend yield of 2.5% is lower than Paychex, it appears to be growing at a faster clip than its smaller rival.

Intuit
Last but not least, we should take a look at Intuit Inc. (NASDAQ:INTU), the creator of TurboTax and other products for small businesses, such as DemandForce (marketing software) and QuickBooks (accounting software). These products, which have been updated as cloud-based software as a service, have lured away many smaller businesses which would have otherwise relied on companies like PayChex for their payroll needs. In other words, small businesses are realizing that the power of Intuit Inc. (NASDAQ:INTU)’s cloud-based software can allow a relatively small on-site HR staff to manage a company's payroll with ease.
This growth in demand from small businesses was reflected in its third quarter earnings, when the company reported a 12% increase in profit on 13% growth in revenue to $2.18 billion. The company topped the analyst consensus on profit while matching expectations on revenue. Total revenue from its small business software rose 17%.
Intuit Inc. (NASDAQ:INTU) reported impressive sales gains for its TurboTax and QuickBooks software, which rose 6% and 26%, respectively. This indicated that not only were more individuals and small businesses using its software for filing taxes, but also for accounting tasks as well. Since its initial release in 2000, QuickBooks has captured 90% of the small business accounting software market. QuickBooks is designed for small business owners with no formal accounting training, which has contributed to its growing popularity. A recently released version of QuickBooks for the iPad has also boosted its mobile presence considerably.

The Foolish Bottom Line
In closing, let’s compare these three companies on a fundamental basis to see which is the better long-term investment.
Forward P/E5-year PEGPrice to Sales (ttm)Return on Equity (ttm)Debt to EquityProfit MarginDividend Yield
Paychex19.992.385.8135.53%No debt24.81%3.6%
Automatic Data Processing21.732.633.0121.54%0.2312.86%2.5%
Intuit16.671.464.0625.29%13.9819.76%1.2%
AdvantageIntuitIntuitADPPaychexPaychexPaychexPaychex
Source: Yahoo Finance, 6/28/2013
Paychex appears to be a solid, stable pick for income, but its PEG ratio suggests that it won’t grow very much over the next five years. Intuit Inc. (NASDAQ:INTU), on the other hand, looks fundamentally undervalued for a tech stock, but it has more debt than either Paychex or ADP. It also has the leanest dividend. However, both Paychex and Intuit could fall faster than Automatic Data Processing (NASDAQ:ADP) in the event of a prolonged economic downturn, due to their exposure to smaller businesses.
Regardless of these concerns, I believe that all three stocks are relatively safe investments that offer important services for smaller and larger businesses. Therefore, they all might be worth picking up during a market swoon in a volatile market.
The article Will Investing in These 3 Payroll Stocks Pay Off? originally appeared on Fool.com and is written by Leo Sun.

Leo Sun has no position in any stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool recommends Automatic Data Processing, Intuit, and Paychex. The Motley Fool owns shares of Intuit. Leo is a member of The Motley Fool Blog Network -- entries represent the personal opinion of the blogger and are not formally edited.

Posted on 8:17 AM | Categories: