Wednesday, August 7, 2013

Intuit Quickbooks Payroll Enhanced 2013 / free!, yes, free!





INTUIT QUICKBOOKS PAYROLL ENHANCED 2013

  • Save time paying employees with instant paychecks and Direct Deposit
  • Automatically calculates payroll taxes & deductions
  • Completes payroll tax forms for you, click to pay & e-file at no additional cost
  • Integrates with QuickBooks
  • Free expert help when you need it
  • Now Windows 8 Compatible
  • 60 Day Money Back Guarantee!1

FEATURES

INTUIT QUICKBOOKS ENHANCED PAYROLL 2013

The #1 payroll system trusted by over one million small businesses2
Paychecks in 3 easy steps
  • Just enter hours
  • QuickBooks Enhanced Payroll calculates payroll taxes and deductions for each paycheck
  • Print paychecks instantly, or use our Direct Deposit (additional fees apply)
Worry-free payroll tax payments and filings
  • QuickBooks Enhanced Payroll automatically fills in federal and state payroll tax forms for you
  • Just click to pay and e-file your taxes or print completed forms on your printer
Additional features & benefits
  • Integration with QuickBooks—no double entry
  • Track job costs within QuickBooks
  • Free support from payroll experts (phone, chat or online)3
  • Pay up to 3 employees; to add more simply select “4 or more” employees when activating your software (additional annual fees apply)
  • Requires Internet access and QuickBooks Pro, Premier or Enterprise Solutions4
Posted on 7:27 AM | Categories:

How Do Your Tax Deductions Stack Up? / Do you know how you compare with your fellow taxpayers when it comes to the deductions you take? We have the answer.

Joy Taylor for Kiplinger writes: Wonder how your itemized deductions compare with those of other filers? Check the averages in this table. It compares several key write-offs claimed by filers at various income levels, using IRS preliminary data from 2011 return
tax deductions table



Some things to keep in mind about the data: The Total Itemized Deductions column of the table includes miscellaneous itemized deductions plus any casualty and theft losses. The averages for taxes paid include taxpayers in states without an income tax who elect to deduct state sales tax, so the amount in the table may seem a bit low. The averages also include personal property taxes and real estate taxes.
And only medical expenses over 7.5% of AGI were deductible, so relatively few filers ended up taking the write-off. The figures above are the averages for those taxpayers.
You won’t automatically be audited for having above-average deductions. The IRS knows that people living in states with high individual income tax rates claim larger state tax deductions than folks in states with low tax rates or no tax. And the agency matches mortgage interest deductions with 1098 forms from lenders.
But if your deductions are disproportionately large when compared with your income, your audit risk can go up because that’s a key factor in IRS’ return selection formula.
Posted on 7:27 AM | Categories:

Reporting Income in the "Sharing Economy" / 1099.IS Helps you figure it out

CHRISTINA CHAEY for FastCompany.com writes: As the sharing economy way of life becomes more mainstream, more people are making primary or secondary incomes by renting their rooms on Airbnb, crowdfunding on Kickstarter, offering a ride through Lyft, or picking up an odd-job on TaskRabbit. But the issue of how to report income remains unclear for many sharing economy workers.

1099.is, a new open-source resource for working freelancers spearheaded by Collaborative Fund, helps demystify some common questions about how to stay accountable and protect yourself against potential IRS audits by correctly filing your taxes.
From 1099.is:
In the process of meeting with dozens of participants in the Sharing Economy – from crowdfunding platforms, car & ride-sharing startups, freelance writers, designers, and coders – we heard the same complaint: taxes are a constant source of uncertainty and pain for all parties involved. Working for yourself has different tax implications than the standard, employer-facilitated W-2 filing. The self-employed are at greater risk of an IRS audit, making accurate filing critical.

Some sharing economy startups provide tax resources for users--Airbnb, for example, will mail you a 1099, the U.S. tax form required for any self-employed worker (such as an Airbnb host). But 1099.is aims to address general topics applicable to any sharing economy venture, such as which expenses are deductible, or how much of your sharing economy-based income you need to report to the IRS (spoiler: all of it). However, 1099.is stresses it's not a tax advice site, nor is it a substitute for a certified tax professional.

Check out  1099.is
Posted on 7:27 AM | Categories:

Bitcoin: Tax Evasion Currency

Robert W. Wood for Forbes writes: In IRS Takes A Bite Out Of Bitcoin, I said that Bitcoin doesn’t obviate taxes. Dissenters argued that the anonymity of the upstart digital currency is all that matters. Perhaps they can evade taxes and the IRS won’t catch them.
But that doesn’t mean there’s no income. Start with how you classify Bitcoin, although that too can be debated. Transactions in Bitcoin could be property, barter, foreign currency, or a financial instrument.
Barter seems the most logical treatment, but not everyone agrees. And investing excitement doesn’t encourage calm reflection. There’s plenty of excitement about Bitcoin, even by the Wall Street Journal. See The Mess the WSJ Made: Famed trader Joe Lewis not Investing in Bitcoins
In fact, if the movie were remade today, The Graduate’s “One Word: Plastics” might be Bitcoin. As The People Making Real Money On Bitcoin, famously Facebooked Tyler and Cameron Winklevoss announced an SEC filing for the “Winklevoss Bitcoin Trust.” It would allow institutional investors to dabble in the virtual currency without having to buy it directly from a Bitcoin Exchange. See Overview.
But the allure of avoiding taxes is like a siren song. In Is Bitcoin the New Tax Haven?, Paul Caron quotes from Omri Y. Marian’s paper Are Cryptocurrencies ‘Super’ Tax Havens?, 112 Mich. L. Rev. (2013). Mr. Marian notes the pressure facing financial institutions to hand over account holders, withhold and remit taxes. The fight against offshore evasion is  raging. And although FATCA was enacted in 2010, the dreaded law is just now coming into its own.
That could be nice timing for Bitcoin. It is anonymous, which is a good start. Think of Bitcoin like unmarked, non-sequential bills. Indeed, the fact that Bitcoin is not dependent on the existence of financial intermediaries is key. Mr. Marian suggests that much more government regulation is coming once the authorities recognize Bitcoin’s potential for serious tax evasion.
The Treasury unit called FinCEN, the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network, already has rules about Bitcoin. The IRS is likely to follow. For example, I expect IRS Forms 1099 can’t be too far off. If you pay a consultant with a new car or in Bitcoins you may have to issue a Form 1099 for that value.
If you are paying wages with Bitcoin, you can hardly withhold some of the Bitcoin and send it to the IRS. If you exchange Bitcoins for cash, whether you have gain may depend on whether Bitcoin is really currency or commodity. The latter seems more likely, meaning you have gain to the extent of the appreciation in your Bitcoin. See IRS Bartering Tax Center.
FinCEN says Bitcoin exchanges and Bitcoin miners should register as Money Services Businesses (MSBs) and comply with anti-money laundering regulations. Still, ordinary Bitcoin users don’t have to register just to purchase goods and services. The IRS treats it as pay in kind, just as if you paid in groceries or anything else of value. You must value what’s provided, withhold income and employment taxes in cash and send the money to the IRS. You also must issue a Form W-2.
With no banking or government involvement, Bitcoin may be anonymous. It may even be ideal for someone who intentionally tries not to pay tax. That may be a small piece of the Bitcoin payment universe. But for most people who file tax returns and report their income whether or not it shows up on a Form W-2 or 1099, it probably isn’t the tax haven some are suggesting it is.
The IRS will surely take steps to regularize tax reporting. What’s more, a Government Accountability Office (GAO) report says the IRS could do a better job telling people they have to pay tax on Bitcoin transactions. Like it or not, that message is probably coming.
Posted on 7:26 AM | Categories:

Do 401(k) plans favor the rich?

The unfairness argument goes something like this: The rule that lets savers fund 401(k)s with pretax income—a tax break worth about $100 billion a year to plan members—is more valuable to high earners, because the higher your tax rate, the more money you save via the deduction. As some economists (most recently Harvard’s Raj Chetty) have noted, the tax breaks don’t lead affluent people to save more money, but rather encourage them to move savings out of investments that don’t have tax advantages and into 401(k)s. The result, critics argue, is that higher-income savers are getting the lion’s share of the benefit from a tax incentive that, strictly speaking, they don’t need.
But when it comes to the savings amassed in people’s 401(k)s, it turns out the lion’s share doesn’t look a lot different than the lamb’s—at least as measured as a ratio of the savers’ salaries. In a recent blog post, Nevin Adams, co-director of retirement research at the nonprofit Employee Benefits Research Institute takes a look at 401(k) balances in EBRI’s bulging database of retirement accounts. Tunneling down to look at workers in their 60s, Adams finds that among workers with similar tenure at their jobs, the ratios of savings to salary stay about the same for savers with annual incomes from around $30,000 all the way up to $100,000. For those with 10 to 20 years of service at a company, for example, it hovers just above 150% of annual income.
Just as notably, for those with income above $100,000, the ratios drop sharply; in that 10-to-20-year group, for example, the ratio of savings to income falls to under 100%.
What’s holding the wealthier savers’ balances in check? As Adams points out, there’s an effective ceiling on 401(k) savings, in the form of the annual cap on contributions (currently $22,500 for savers over 50) and other more arcane rules. In the grand scheme of things, of course, higher earners will almost always have more and better retirement-savings options than their mainstream peers; but Adams argues that the 401(k) system does indeed “maintain a certain parity” within its own borders.
Posted on 7:26 AM | Categories:

Wrestling With a Summer Tax-Filing Headache / Advisers are facing a growing summer hassle--late Schedule K-1 statements--as more clients diversify their portfolios with partnerships.

Arden Dale for the Wall St. Journal writes:  As more investors diversify their portfolios with partnerships, their financial advisers are stuck with a growing summer headache: late Schedule K-1 statements.


The Internal Revenue Service requires these statements from trusts, hedge funds, private equity and other partnerships, and they often don’t arrive until just before Sept. 15, the extended deadline for filing tax returns on that form of income.
While the return is typically handled by accountants or tax attorneys, the adviser must guess in advance how much income a client’s K-1s are likely to report, and free up cash to make estimated tax payments. The documents’ late arrival creates even more hassles for advisers who help to manage partnerships.
“Making sure that clients have adequate liquidity to cover taxes is a No. 1 concern for investment advisers,” said Peter Disch, an adviser in Boston who manages around $150 million.
He has been struggling to process the recent late arrival of some K-1s. And for other clients, the forms still haven’t arrived. A client of Mr. Disch–a family that founded a now-publicly traded company–has a dozen different limited partnerships, and he is waiting for the K-1s from certain investments held by the partnerships.
Mr. Disch acts as “conduit” between the family and its accountants, and as such, he lets the tax professionals know the documents will be late so they can “hit the ground running” when it comes time to file the tax returns.
Investors in some exchange-traded funds, including those focused on energy investments, can also get caught up in K-1 troubles if a fund invests in partnerships.
A partnership K-1 is due to the IRS along with Form 1065 on April 15. The deadline to get the document to an investor, however, is the same day. That leaves little time to deal with a complicated document. Large partnerships may try to get an estimated K-1 out in March (a small subset has an official March 15 deadline.) Some K-1s come late because the partnership has to base its statements on K-1s from its own investments.
While some K-1s do arrive in investors’ mailboxes as early as March, others may get there as late as September, right before the extended filing date for tax returns for which they are needed.
Henry Bragg, a partner and director of planning at Horizon Advisors in Houston, speculates that investors in his part of the country may be especially hard hit with late K-1s because of the popularity of oil and gas partnerships in the area.
Mr. Bragg helps to manage a family partnership with more than 10 trusts and several individuals as partners. He has received most of the K-1s, but not all. He will have little time to help organize the tax returns if the missing documents don’t arrive soon.
The mountain of paperwork is harder to deal with because each trust may owe taxes in several states, as well as to the federal government.
“Some would say it is a high-class problem…I call it the effluence of wealth,” said Mr. Bragg, whose firm manages around $210 million. “It can be, and most often is, an absolute cluster of inefficiency.”
Late K-1 statements are a serious enough issue that Congress several years ago moved the deadline to file partnership tax returns from Oct. 15 to Sept. 15.
Congress is considering a bill to change other tax filing deadlines, and to help resolve the K-1 issue and improve the flow of information among taxpayers, the partnerships and the IRS, said Melissa Labant, director of tax at the American Institute of CPAs.
Posted on 7:26 AM | Categories: