Sunday, September 1, 2013

How to Limit Taxes on Capital Gains in Retirement / Check to see if you qualify for the 0% capital-gains tax rate.

Sandra Block for Kiplinger writes:   "My wife and I are retired and need money from our mutual funds. What will we pay in taxes?"
Depending on your income, you might not have to pay any taxes on your gains. The on-again, off-again 0% long-term capital gains rate for taxpayers in the 10% and 15% tax brackets has been made permanent—and that could benefit a lot of retirees.
In 2013, married couples who file jointly qualify for the 0% capital gains rate if their taxable income is $72,500 or less; for single filers, the cutoff is $36,250. Rates for taxpayers in higher brackets range from 15% to 23.8%. Taxable income is what's left after you subtract personal exemptions (worth $3,900 each in 2013 for you, your spouse and your dependents) plus your standard or itemized deductions from your adjusted gross income. If you don't itemize, note that seniors 65 or older qualify for a larger standard deduction than younger taxpayers ($14,600 for married couples who are both 65 or older; $7,600 for single filers).
Gains must be long-term. To qualify for preferential treatment, you must hold your shares of stocks or mutual funds more than a year before you sell. Short-term gains (on assets held a year or less) are taxed at your ordinary income tax rate.
In addition, the shares must be held in taxable accounts. Profits in tax-deferred retirement accounts, such as traditional IRAs, aren't taxed until you take withdrawals, but at that point you'll pay taxes at your ordinary income tax rate (see Make Your Money Last).
Your gains could lift you into a higher tax bracket. When you sell stocks or funds, the profits will increase your taxable income. To pay no taxes on the sale, you'll have to calculate the amount of gains you can take before your income exceeds the threshold.
Let's say your adjusted gross income (AGI) is $60,000. Assuming you're both 65 or older, your standard deduction and exemptions will knock your taxable income down to $37,600. That means you can realize up to $34,900 in long-term gains—boosting your total taxable income to $72,500—without paying taxes on the profits. If you take more gains, the 0% rate won't disappear; you'll just owe 15% on gains that exceed $34,900.
Capital gains could increase taxes on Social Security benefits. Your AGI plays a critical role in how much, if any, of your Social Security benefits will be taxed. If your "provisional income" (your AGI plus 50% of your Social Security benefits plus any tax-free interest) exceeds $44,000 on a joint return, it's likely that 85% of your benefits will be taxed. As you consider taking profits, remember that capital gains are included in the calculation, even if they're tax-free, because they're part of your AGI, says Mark Luscombe, federal tax analyst for CCH, a leading publisher of tax information. If you have provisional income of $44,000 or less, less than 85% of your benefits will be taxed. Alternatively, if you're a recent retiree, taking advantage of the 0% tax break to generate tax-free income could enable you to postpone filing for Social Security, which can lead to higher lifetime benefits.
Mark Joseph, a certified financial planner with Sentinel Wealth Management, in Reston, Va., is concerned that many taxpayers who qualify for tax-free gains may not know the break has been made permanent. "It's not often you get a gift from the IRS," he says. "When you do, you definitely want to open it."
Posted on 5:23 AM | Categories:

A new investment tax is just around the bend

TimesUnion.com writes: I'm going to guess that the last thing you want to think about over the Labor Day weekend is taxes. But this fall, you may want to start planning so that you are not surprised by a higher tax bill as a result of the Affordable Care Act tax provisions that kicked in last January.
As usual, nothing is as simple as it should be. To help taxpayers understand the new law, the Internal Revenue Service website provides some key information. Let's focus strictly on the new investment tax, which affects taxpayers whose modified adjusted gross income exceeds $200,000 (single filers) or $250,000 (joint filers).
The new 3.8 percent tax on Net Investment Income calls for a new tax form (IRS Form 8960). If you have NII, you'll also need to account for the extra tax in your estimated quarterly filings.
Here are some guidelines, which I have adapted from the IRS's Q&A on Net Investment Income.
What is investment income? Generally, interest, dividends, capital gains, rental and royalty income, nonqualified annuities, income from businesses involved in trading of financial instruments or commodities, and businesses that are passive activities to the taxpayer.
What is Net Investment Income? Investment income is reduced by certain expenses, such as investment interest expense, investment advisory and brokerage fees.
What is not NII? Wages, unemployment compensation, Social Security benefits, alimony, tax-exempt interest, self-employment income, and distributions from certain qualified plans, such as 401(k)s and traditional IRAs.
What gains are included in NII? Those from the sale of stocks, bonds and mutual funds, investment real estate, partnership interests and capital-gains distributions from mutual funds.
How is the NII tax calculated? A taxpayer who files singly has $180,000 of wages. The taxpayer also received $90,000 of NII. The taxpayer's modified adjusted gross income is $270,000, or $70,000 over the $200,000 threshold for single filers.
The NII tax is calculated on the lesser of $70,000 (see above) or $90,000 (NII). The NII tax is $2,660 ($70,000 x 3.8 percent).
What about gains on the sale of a personal residence?
Gains are not included in NII if they are excluded from gross income for regular income-tax purposes.
The first $250,000 ($500,000 in the case of a married couple) of gain is excluded from both gross income and NII.
Here is a real estate example provided by the IRS showing how NII taxes may be due on the sale of a personal residence. B and C, a married couple filing jointly, sell their principal residence that they have owned and resided in for the past 10 years for $1.3 million. B and C's cost basis in the home is $700,000. B and C's realized gain on the sale is $600,000. The recognized gain subject to regular income taxes is $100,000 ($600,000 realized gain less the $500,000 exclusion for married couples filing jointly). B and C have $125,000 of other NII, which brings B and C's total NII to $225,000. B and C's modified adjusted gross income is $300,000, which exceeds the threshold amount of $250,000 by $50,000. B and C are subject to NII taxes on the lesser of $225,000 (B's NII) or $50,000 (the amount B and C's modified adjusted gross income exceeds the $250,000 married filing jointly threshold). B and C owe NII taxes of $1,900 ($50,000 x 3.8 percent).
For details, read the IRS's Q&A on Net Investment Income athttp://www.irs.gov/uac/Newsroom/Net-Investment-Income-Tax-FAQs.
Posted on 5:23 AM | Categories:

'Do-It-Yourself' Ways to File Taxes IRS 'partners' offer free assistance to seniors and others

  • TOM HERMAN for the Wall St. Journal writes:   
  • Q: I am tired of my tax-preparation fees and so would like to try and prepare my returns myself. Can I take a draft of my return to an IRS office for review and feedback before actual submission?

A:No, the Internal Revenue Service doesn't offer that kind of help, says Eric Smith, an IRS spokesman. But there are other possibilities worth considering. The IRS works with "several partners" in order to "make sure you have options for free help," he says. Some options: the Volunteer Income Tax Assistance program, or VITA, and Tax Counseling for the Elderly, or TCE.
The VITA program "generally offers free tax help to people who make $51,000 or less and need assistance in preparing their own tax returns," the IRS says. VITA sites, staffed by IRS-certified volunteers, typically can be found in "community and neighborhood centers, libraries, schools, shopping malls," military bases and other places.
"The VITA program is excellent," says Caroline D. Ciraolo, a partner at the law firm Rosenberg Martin Greenberg LLP in Baltimore and a long-time VITA volunteer who trains other volunteers at Fort Meade in Maryland.
TCE offers "free tax help for all with priority assistance to people who are 60 years of age and older, specializing in questions about pensions and retirement issues unique to seniors," according to the IRS.
For both programs, the IRS "produces training materials and requires that program volunteers pass a certification test." To find a location and other details, go to the IRS site (www.irs.gov) and type "IRS Free Tax Return Preparation" in the search box.
Another option: "Free File," the tax-return preparation and e-filing software offered free by numerous private-sector companies through the IRS site. There are income limits for filing in this manner.

The IRS also offers "online Fillable Forms," an electronic version of its paper forms. "This option is best for people who are comfortable preparing their tax returns but want the advantages of fast, secure and free e-filing," Mr. Smith says. Fillable forms "do only basic math and do not support state tax returns."
Posted on 5:23 AM | Categories:

Gay Marriages Get Recognition From the I.R.S.

Annie Lowrey for the NY Times writes: All same-sex couples who are legally married will be recognized as such for federal tax purposes, even if the state where they live does not recognize their union, the Treasury Department and the Internal Revenue Service said Thursday.


It is the broadest federal rule change to come out of the landmark Supreme Court decision in June that struck down the 1996 Defense of Marriage Act, and a sign of how quickly the government is moving to treat gay couples in the same way that it does straight couples.
The June decision found that same-sex couples were entitled to federal benefits, but left open the question of how Washington would actually administer them. The Treasury Department answered some of those questions on Thursday. As of the 2013 tax year, same-sex spouses who are legally married will not be able to file federal tax returns as if either were single. Instead, they must file together as “married filing jointly” or individually as “married filing separately.”
Their address or the location of their wedding does not matter, as long as the marriage is legal: a same-sex couple who marry in Albany, N.Y., and move to Alabama are treated the same as a same-sex couple who marry and live in Massachusetts.
“Today’s ruling provides certainty and clear, coherent tax-filing guidance for all legally married same-sex couples nationwide,” Treasury Secretary Jacob J. Lew said. “This ruling also assures legally married same-sex couples that they can move freely throughout the country knowing that their federal filing status will not change.”
Gay and civil rights groups praised the ruling. “Committed and loving gay and lesbian married couples will now be treated equally under our nation’s federal tax laws, regardless of what state they call home,” said Chad Griffin, the president of the Human Rights Campaign. “These families finally have access to crucial tax benefits and protections previously denied to them under the discriminatory Defense of Marriage Act.”  
But the Treasury decision could have ramifications for many gay couples’ tax liabilities, said Roberton Williams of the nonpartisan Tax Policy Center in Washington. Couples with similar incomes often pay the “marriage penalty,” with their tax liability as a couple being much higher than it would be if they were single.  
At the same time, same-sex couples will also be able to file amended returns for certain prior tax years, meaning that many couples might be eligible for refunds. Couples do not have to file amended returns if they do not want to, a senior Treasury official said, meaning that couples who might pay the marriage penalty would not owe back taxes.
But the ruling creates complications for same-sex couples who live in any of the 37 states that do not recognize their marriages. Previously, such couples filed federal and state tax returns as individuals. Now, they will have to file their federal returns as other married couples do, but may be required to file their state returns as individuals.
“There’s going to be a cumbersome workaround,” said Nanette Lee Miller of Marcum L.L.P., a public accounting firm. She sees it as a paperwork bother more than a financial issue.
States might also respond to the federal ruling with changes of their own. “Most state income tax regimes begin with federal taxable income as the starting point,” Marvin Kirsner, a tax lawyer at Greenberg Traurig, said in an e-mail. “These state taxing authorities will have to figure out how to deal with a same-sex married couple who file a joint income tax return for federal tax purposes.” He added,
“We will need to see guidance from each nonrecognition state to see how this will be handled.”
The rule change is likely to provide a small increase for federal revenue, as more same-sex couples pay the marriage penalty, Mr. Williams said, describing it as a “rounding error.” But it would be partly offset by new federal spending on benefits for same-sex spouses.
The ruling applies to all legal marriages made in the United States or foreign countries. But it does not extend to civil unions, registered domestic partnerships or other legal relationships, the Treasury said.
The Treasury ruling is one of many that are starting to emerge from all corners of the federal government as Washington changes regulations to conform with the Supreme Court decision.
Separately, the Health and Human Services Department said Thursday that Medicare would extend certain key benefits to same-sex spouses, “clarifying that all beneficiaries in private Medicare plans have access to equal coverage when it comes to care in a nursing home where their spouse lives.” 
But federal agencies are not moving in lock step. Instead, they are creating a patchwork of regulations affecting gay and lesbian couples — and may be raising questions about discrimination and fairness in the way that federal benefits are distributed.
Medicare and Treasury officials have said they would use a “place of celebration” standard for determining whether gay couples are eligible for benefits. That means same-sex couples would receive benefits as long as they are legally married, regardless of where they live.
But the Social Security Administration is now using a “place of residence” standard in determining spousal benefits, and a gay couple in Alabama might not receive the same benefits as a gay couple in New York until final determinations are made or Congress acts. The Obama administration has pushed federal agencies to ensure the Supreme Court’s ruling is carried out quickly and smoothly.
“It would be nice if they were consistent,” Ms. Miller said. Creating federal regulations is a process and could change, she said.
Posted on 5:22 AM | Categories:

Same-Sex Married Couples Will Get Federal Tax Breaks, No Matter Where They Live

Deborah L Jacobs for Forbes writes:  The Internal Revenue Service today answered a hugely important question that has lingered since the Supreme Court’s historic June 26 decision on same-sex marriage: In determining whether a gay couple is married for federal tax purposes, will the IRS apply the law of the state where they live, or the law of the state where they got married–which lawyers call the “state of celebration”? Today the U.S. Department of the Treasury and the IRS announced that only the state of celebration matters.
So, for example, if you’re legally married in New York, the IRS will consider you married even if you retire to Florida–a state that does not allow same-sex marriage and where there is strong sentiment against it. This ruling “assures legally married same-sex couples that they can move freely throughout the country knowing that their federal filing status will not change,” said Treasury Secretary Jacob J. Lew.
Revenue Ruling 2013-17, announced today, applies to all federal tax provisions where marriage is a factor. That includes not just filing status, but also claiming personal and dependency exemptions, taking the standard deduction, employee benefits, contributing to an IRA and claiming the earned income tax credit or child tax credit.
The ruling became necessary as a result of the Supreme Court decision invalidating a key provision of the 1996 Defense of Marriage Act or DOMA. InUnited States v.Windsor, the Court overturned the section of the law which defined marriage as between a man and a woman, and spouses as heterosexual. But the Court stopped far short of meddling with state regulation of marriage, or expressing any opinion about what happens to anything other than federal rights when same-sex spouses cross state lines. Currently same-sex marriage is only legal in 13 states and the District of Columbia.
Following the Court’s decision, pundits debated whether there was authority for federal agencies to apply a place of celebration approach, so that same-sex married couples would have access to the full range of benefits that are available to heterosexual spouses under federal laws and regulations. (See my post, “Feds Work Overtime To Fill Gaps Left By DOMA Ruling.”) Today’s IRS ruling tells us how the Supreme Court decision will be implemented in the context of federal taxes.
Under the IRS ruling, which will be published Sept. 16, same-sex couples will be treated as married for all federal tax purposes, including income and gift and estate taxes.
Any same-sex marriage legally entered into in one of the 50 states, the District of Columbia, a U.S. territory or a foreign country will be covered by the ruling. Many gay couples who don’t live in a state that allows them to marry go elsewhere for the marriage ceremony, and then go back home. That’s precisely what happened with Edith Windsor, who brought the Supreme Court case. She and Thea Spyer, her partner of 44 years, lived in New York, but got married in Canada before New York legalized same-sex marriage. (See my report here.)
The trouble is that a same-sex couple who get married in a state that permits same-sex marriage may find their new marriage disregarded by another state they live in or move to or receive an inheritance from. There was some uncertainty after the Supreme Court’s June decision about whether this would affect their federal tax status. The IRS made clear today that it would not. Here’s how the IRS ruling will play out.
How This Affects Income Taxes
For the 2013 tax year, legally-married same-sex couples generally must file their federal income tax return using either the married filing jointly or married filing separately filing status.
How about past years? Couples who were in same-sex marriages may, but are not required to, file original or amended returns choosing to be treated as married for federal tax purposes. If they got an extension to file the 2012 return, they have until Sept. 15 to decide whether to file that return as married or not.
They can also file claims for refunds for one or more prior tax years. Generally, the statute of limitations for filing a refund claim is three years from the date the return was filed or two years from the date the tax was paid, whichever is later. Therefore, refund claims can still be filed for tax years 2010, 2011 and 2012. Some taxpayers may have special circumstances, such as signing an agreement with the IRS to keep the statute of limitations open, that permit them to file refund claims for tax years 2009 and earlier.
To file a refund claim, use Form 1040X. For information on filing an amended return, see Tax Topic 308, Amended Returns, available on the IRS web site, orthe Instructions to Forms 1040X. Information on where to file your amended returns is available in the instructions to the form.
Today’s announcement also affects the taxation of health insurance. In the past, a worker who received employer-paid health coverage for a same-sex spouse had to pay federal income tax on the value of those benefits. That will no longer be the case.
How This Affects Estate and Gift Tax
Same-sex married couples, like other spouses can now transfer as much as they want to each other, either during life or at death, without having to pay any federal estate or gift tax, provided that the recipient spouse is a U.S. citizen. This is called the marital deduction.
These are federal estate planning benefits, in addition to the marital deduction, that will be available to same-sex couples as a result of today’s ruling.
Portability. This is the ability of widows and widowers to add the unused estate tax exclusion (now $5.25 million) of the spouse who died most recently to their own. The concept was introduced by the 2010 tax law (although the term was invented by tax geeks and does not appear in the legislation). Portability was made permanent by the 2012 tax law. (See my post, “After The Fiscal Cliff Deal: Estate And Gift Tax Explained.”)
To take advantage of portability, the executor handling the estate of the spouse who died will need to transfer the unused exclusion to the survivor, who can then use it to make lifetime gifts or pass assets through his or her estate. The prerequisite is filing an estate tax return when the first spouse dies, even if no tax is owed. This return is due nine months after death with a six-month extension allowed. If the executor doesn’t file the return or misses the deadline, the spouse loses the right to portability. (See my post, “The Deadline Every Married Person (And Financial Advisor) Needs To Know About.”)
Gift-splitting. Currently, you can give up to $14,000 each year to as many recipients as you would like without incurring gift tax. Spouses can combine this annual exclusion–a process called gift-splitting–to jointly give $28,000 to any person tax-free. Spouses can gift-split by giving $14,000 each, $28,000 from a joint account or $28,000 from one of their individual accounts. These restrictions apply whether you make outright gifts to individuals or put the funds into trusts for their benefit. (For more about annual exclusion gifts, see my post, “IRS Raises Yearly Limit For Tax-Free Gifts.”)
Any gift that’s more than the annual exclusion counts against the lifetime gift tax exclusion – the amount that each individual can give away during life without triggering gift tax. Once you have passed the limit, which is $5.25 million, gift tax of up to 40% applies. Couples can also gift-split with their applicable exclusion amount and together transfer up to $10.5 million through lifetime gifts.
To claim a refund claim for gift or estate taxes, file Form 843.
Posted on 5:22 AM | Categories:

From Great Books to QuickBooks / CFOs must have accounting and finance training to succeed, but undergraduate degrees in the humanities and social sciences are what propelled these six executives to the top finance spot.

David McAnn for CFO writes: University liberal-arts degree programs, especially those in the humanities and social sciences, are under fire for allegedly not training students for the jobs that will drive their careers and the economy in the future. To the vast majority of CFOs who have undergraduate degrees in accounting, finance and business, that may seem logical.
But most finance chiefs who chose to focus in college on humanities or social sciences are passionate defenders of the value that educational experience has contributed to their careers. Specifically, they say, it taught them how to bring a multidimensional approach to problem solving, to understand the drivers of people’s behavior, to communicate effectively and to adapt to new and evolving business environments.
CFOs may want to take that into account when evaluating candidates for their team. To be sure, concern has been rising for years over a perceived shortage of young talent well-schooled in business, finance and accounting and ready to make an impact in a corporate job. And indeed, all of the CFOs interviewed for this article say they regularly hire candidates with the more traditional backgrounds and don’t see liberal arts as a “better” breeding ground for future finance executives. Still, they believe equally strongly that a post-graduate degree in business, finance or accounting is sufficient training for entry-level jobs and that their undergraduate experience has contributed much toward making them well-rounded executives.
“Whenever I’m interviewing for a job, they ask how a psychology major became an accountant,” says Marie Epstein, head of finance at Plastiq, a startup credit-card-payment processor. I say, ‘Isn’t it obvious? Accounting is not just nuts and bolts, numbers and spreadsheets. There’s a tremendous human dimension to everything that goes on in business.’ I’m glad I wasn’t just in debits and credits as an undergrad.”
Variously situated CFOs who have liberal-arts degrees speak out on their formative years, how they wound up in finance, and the role that their undergraduate education plays for them today.
HISTORY BOY
Brian Tierney
CFO, American Electric Power
College: Boston College
Undergraduate Major: History
Throughout his life, says Brian Tierney, he’s been driven by a desire to make the world a better place. At first he intended to do that as an attorney, for which he thought history would provide a good background, because it focuses on reading, analysis and writing. After college he served a year in the Peace Corps, and then found that he couldn’t swing law school financially. But he also saw a chance to change people’s lives through a career in business. A two-year stint as a sales management trainee at General Foods wasn’t the right fit, so he set about earning an MBA at the University of Chicago.
How does running a $15 billion utility company help Tierney achieve his lifelong goal? “Electricity makes people’s lives better every single day,” he says. “I’m in a role where I’m allocating capital where it’s needed in the energy space, which is one of the key drivers to an improved standard of living.”
The way of thinking instilled by an education in the humanities “has served me very well” in that pursuit, says Tierney, “particularly the higher up I go in directing and managing issues outside of finance.” In his 15 years at AEP Tierney has been responsible for areas outside of finance, such as energy trading, operations, engineering, distribution services, customer services and procurement.
“The interdisciplinary approach you learn as a humanities major makes you comfortable in areas where you don’t have an expert’s depth of knowledge,” says Tierney. “You can figure out what questions to ask and how to challenge people who are deeply involved in the discipline.”

A foundation in the humanities also comes in handy when a CFO has to communicate with the CEO, the board, and investors and analysts. The job of a CFO, Tierney notes, is not to just present the numbers; any accountant can do that. The real job is telling a clear story about why the numbers are what they are, and to put that in the context of the company’s strategy and future plans. “My history background provides me a strong basis for that context and component of my job,” he says.
TWO ROADS DIVERGE
Roger Millay
CFO, Towers Watson
College: University of Virginia
Undergraduate Major: English literature
At the time Roger Millay declared his college major, he was “pretty confused” about his career direction. He had thought about aiming toward law school, but didn’t have a clear focus. He’d taken some humanities classes and enjoyed them, and his girlfriend was an English major, so English seemed as good a direction as anything else.
The first seeds of change for Millay, who was a work-study student, were sewn when he got a job in the dean of students’ office running a student loan program. Students in a temporary cash crunch could apply for a one-month, $50 loan. Millay disbursed and collected the money and kept the books. After that, he started taking some business classes and found he was actually better at business than at English literature.
Upon graduation, he was interested enough in business to enroll in a one-year, master’s-in-accounting program at Georgetown University, which led to his first post-college job at auditor Arthur Young. He quickly got on the fast track, and after four years he and one other auditor were promoted to manager. It was the first time Arthur Young’s Stamford, Conn. office had offered accelerated promotions to manager, he says. “Early on in public accounting, my writing and communication skills clearly differentiated me from those who had done a four-year business undergrad,” Millay says.
But at the time, as other liberal-arts-majors-turned-CFO have experienced, Millay was behind the curve in core accounting. He was able to catch up in fairly short order—it took him about two years, he says.
The same kinds of skills propelled Millay in his next job at General Electric, where he worked for 12 years. His presentation abilities, he says, put him on the road to his first CFO role, which was at a business unit within GE Capital.
Today, at Towers Watson, a $3.5 billion consulting firm, a diverse liberal-arts education is part of what allows Millay to maintain the broad perspective on business issues that is vital for a corporate leader. “Some finance professionals have difficulty making the transition to being on a leadership team alongside people from various functions. Educational focus can play a part in allowing a CFO to branch out beyond narrow finance expertise and be a leader.”
ENGLISH TRANSLATION
Eileen Kamerick
CFO, Press Ganey
College: Boston College
Undergraduate Major: English
Eileen Kamerick, who has been finance chief at the large recruiting firm Heidrick & Struggles and investment bank Houlihan Lokey, among others, recently took the finance reins at a firm in another completely different industry. Her new employer, Press Ganey, offers data-driven tools designed to let hospitals and medical practices better understand the patient experience.
Press Ganey’s niche is a part of the health care industry that’s fast-growing and evolving. Executives in the field “have to be able to think of new ways in which to communicate with people and how to grasp new ideas and attack them,” says Kamerick. “I think a classic liberal arts education creates that ability to think broadly and organize your thoughts.”
Kamerick’s history of disparate finance posts mimics her educational background. After graduating from Boston College with an English degree, she went to law school at the University of Chicago. After that she settled into what looked to be a career climbing the ranks at mega–law firm Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher and Flom, where she worked on hostile corporate takeovers.
 As it turned out, her education wasn’t over. The general counsel at a Skadden, Arps client, Amoco, talked her into coming on board there to work on international transactions. “His pitch to me was that the nature of law firms is that attorneys are required to specialize, and they run the risk of being an inch wide and a mile deep,” she says. “Working in-house, an attorney can do lots of things. Amoco was growing, and he said it was the kind of company where a person with ambition and drive could do anything.”
After Kamerick started the new job, she found that “the game of business, the intrigue, all the ways in which you can work with people to drive value and create profit, captivated me in a way I had never been captivated by law.” So she went back to the University of Chicago for an MBA.
Kamerick had plenty of reasons to doubt her decision, especially because she took an enormous pay cut in moving to Amoco and then saw her former colleagues at Skadden making partner, one by one. Years later, she has no such qualms. “In retrospect it was absolutely the right thing for me,” she says. “I see my varied background as an enormous advantage, with the world changing so much and the need to learn new things.” That’s a large part of what has enabled her to move, fairly seamlessly, from industry to industry.
Besides, she notes, “Today, any technical [accounting or finance] skill you learn will be obsolete within five years. That’s true even for CFOs. There are changes from month to month in regulation, accounting rules and the capital markets.”
Kamerick credits much of her success in finance to an ability, enhanced as an English major, to “communicate clearly in a way that doesn’t descend into some of the mystery mastery that both finance people and lawyers are sometimes accused of.”
ART FOR ART’S SAKE
Tania Secor
CFO, Gerson Lehrman Group
College: Columbia University
Undergraduate Major: Art history
Believe it or not, majoring in art history was part of a conscious plan for Tania Secor to become an investment banker and a CFO.
Like Roger Millay, she was not grounded in a career path early in her college years. In fact, she didn’t declare a major until her junior year. That came after a summer internship at Salomon Brothers. “I knew that if I were going to get a real job, I would need to have a real job on my résumé,” she says of the internship. “But I still didn’t know what I wanted to do in school, except spend a semester in Paris.”
She confided her uncertainties to her mentor at Salomon, where early on she found investment banking to be interesting. “Tania, look,” Secor recalls the mentor telling her, “as an undergrad, the smartest thing you could do is to study something you enjoy. That doesn’t mean don’t focus on your career. You can come back and work for us again next summer.”
Secor, whose mother was an artist and who grew up loving art history, calls that the best advice she ever got. “I took classes at museums, traveling all over New York City for course work, and I got my semester in Paris. I improved my analytical and memorization skills. And then, because I had that summer internship, when I graduated I landed a lot of interviews at investment banks.” She took a job with JPMorgan.
That’s when the chief downside to the plan materialized. “I was sitting there next to people who had been business undergrads at Wharton. I had to work a lot harder than they did. The company trained me well, but it was a tradeoff,” Secor says.
Still, she wouldn’t trade her undergraduate years. She likes to tell a story about an experience she had while seeking work two years ago, after which she landed her current job at Gerson Lehrman Group, a $300 million provider of research resources. She went one day for a meeting with a recruiter at Russell Reynolds, one of the finance field’s biggest headhunter firms. Upon entering the reception area, she noticed that the firm was blessed with “an amazing art collection.” When the recruiter came out to greet her, she pointed to a nearby painting and said “Steve, isn’t that a Chagall?” He replied, “Yes, how did you know?” Well, it was easy, given Secor’s art-history degree.
As chance would have it, the recruiter had also majored in art history. So the two embarked on a leisurely tour of the office, trading notes on the artwork that graced the walls. “You never know when being a well-rounded person will work to your advantage,” says Secor.
FINANCE THERAPY
David Horn
Partner, Tatum LLC
College: Dickinson College
Undergraduate Major: Psychology
David Horn’s employer, Tatum, provides interim CFO services, a niche he has been engaged in for the past 15 years. In that line of work, he says, he calls on his undergraduate degree in psychology “pretty much continuously.”
For a contract executive, he notes, “time frames get compressed considerably, so an essential part of the job is getting accepted by the organization quickly. Every business is a living, breathing thing with its own sociology and important people with needs and fears. If you’re sensitive to that, you maneuver your way to being accepted and then being effective.”
In fact, many Tatum contract CFOs have been liberal-arts graduates, Horn says. “My observation has been that it’s probably based on people wanting variety. There is a curiosity that resonates in someone with a broader educational background.”
He didn’t have a clear reason for choosing psychology as his major. “I just loved learning, and I looked at the catalog and wanted to be in every single department,” he says. “I had no idea what my career aspirations were at that point.”
But Horn did know he had a strong interest in business. Along with his psychology major, he took enough economics courses to fall just one short of earning a second major in that subject. He’s someone who fully appreciates Goethe’s 1796 assertion that “double-entry bookkeeping is one of the most beautiful discoveries of the human spirit.”
“People get this nutty idea that accounting is about math, and it’s not,” Horn says. “It’s more like zoology—it’s a classification system, where you’re taking a lot of information and structuring it in ways people can use.”
FROM BROADWAY TO WALL STREET
Eric Segal
Managing Director, CFO Consulting Partners
College: Carnegie Mellon
Undergraduate Major: Liberal arts
Eric Segal’s degree isn’t technically in “liberal arts.” At Carnegie Mellon University, liberal-arts students were responsible for creating a “self-defined major.” A student’s major couldn’t be named after any academic department or departments—it couldn’t be “English,” or “English and History,” or History and Theater.” So Segal put together a plan that included English, history, theater, computer-sciences and psychology courses and called it, creatively, “The Creative Process.” And that’s what his diploma shows he has a degree in.
Segal’s goal coming into college was to prepare for a career in theater administration, and post-graduation he went into that field at an off-Broadway company in New York. After a short time his role became box-office treasurer, which was on the management track, but he realized he needed more hard-core business skills. He landed a scholarship at Pace University’s business school for liberal-arts majors who were under-employed in their field. Making $150 a week, Segal qualified.
He says his undergraduate education trained him in a way of thinking that has helped him remain cool during crises. For example, he ran into a situation at American Express where he became CFO of a new broker-dealer business. He was hired for the independent-thinking skills mentioned above, but as he started the job he saw there was no financial reporting and accounting infrastructure specific to the unit. The problem was, he didn’t have a great deal of accounting wherewithal.
Unfazed, he hired a controller, and they mapped out the process together. “I could lead that process, but I needed help with the doing,” he says. “Once we mapped out the cash flow, accounting flow and information flow, the debits, credits and controls could be handled by the controller. It was a formative experience for me, and it was greatly facilitated by my education.”
Segal’s undergraduate educational experience has continued to be invaluable to his career. “In my 18 years at American Express I was never really in the card business,” he says, “because I was always a person they involved in something new or different or that needed independent thought.”
Segal picked up some accounting along the way, but it never became a strong suit. Today, as a partner in a small interim-CFO business, he tells his clients: “If you want to bring me in to close the books in four business days, and I accept that assignment, we’ve both made a bad decision.”
Posted on 5:22 AM | Categories: