Saturday, September 28, 2013

Seven (7) Year-end Tax Moves for Individuals

Steve Gross for Skoda Minotti writes: No one is sure what Congress will do before 2014, but major tax reform remains a possibility. Nevertheless, with some astute planning, you may be able to maximize existing tax benefits—including those available under the new American Taxpayer Relief Act of 2012 (ATRA)—while staying flexible. 


Here are seven year-end strategies to consider.
  1. Offset capital gains and losses. Examine your portfolio. Depending on your situation, you might realize capital losses to offset prior capital gains, or vice versa. Any excess loss may offset up to $3,000 of ordinary income before being carried over to next year. For 2013, the maximum tax rate on net long-term capital gain is 15% (20% for certain high-income investors).
  2. Analyze AMT ramifications. Despite modest increases in exemption amounts for the alternative minimum tax (AMT), many taxpayers will still be blindsided by this “stealth tax.” Generally, the AMT applies if you have an overabundance of “tax preference items,” especially if you reside in a high-tax state. Have a review of your AMT liability conducted to determine if you should shift income items or deductions at year-end.
  3. Secure deductions for charitable gifts. You can generally deduct the full amount of monetary gifts made to qualified charities if you keep the proper records. Also, you may deduct the fair market value of gifts of appreciated property if certain requirements are met. But be aware that special limits may apply, including a reduction in deductions for some high-income taxpayers.
  4. Prepay state and local income taxes. Absent other circumstances, the conventional wisdom is to reduce your current income tax bill, when possible. Therefore, you might arrange to prepay any state and local income taxes due on January 1, 2014, before the end of the year. As a result, you can increase the 2013 deduction for state and local taxes.
  5. Bunch up medical expenses. Beginning in 2013, the threshold for deducting medical expenses for most working taxpayers increases to 10% of adjusted gross income (AGI), up from 7.5% of AGI. If you have a shot at a deduction, move elective expenses, such as dental cleanings and physical examinations, into this year. Otherwise, you might as well postpone expenses to next year.
  6. Generate an energy credit. Under current law, you may qualify for a residential energy credit for installing energy-saving property in your home. The credit is generally equal to 10% of qualified expenses, up to a lifetime maximum credit of $500, although other special limits may apply. The credit is now scheduled to expire after 2013, but it could be extended again.
  7. Lock in dependency exemptions for children. Usually, you can claim a dependency exemption for children younger than 19 or full-time students younger than 24. But you have to provide more than half the child’s support to qualify. When necessary, increase support at year-end to ensure that you clear the half-support mark for 2013.
This article includes some popular year-end strategies for individual taxpayers, but your situation may differ. You should get guidance specific to your unique needs from your tax advisor at Skoda Minotti.
Don’t Forget New Surtax
There’s another tax wrinkle this year: a new 3.8% Medicare surtax applies to the lesser of your “net investment income” (e.g., capital gains) or the excess above $200,000 of adjusted gross income for single filers and $250,000 for joint filers. This could be a significant factor in your investment decisions (see no. 1).
Posted on 5:59 AM | Categories:

Who Is Legally Not Required to File an Income Tax Return?

Gregory Hamel for Demand Media writes: Whenever you get income from job, savings or investments, you usually have to fork over a cut of the cash to the federal government to pay income taxes. Once a year, certain taxpayers have to file federal tax returns to make sure that the correct amount of income tax was paid. You may not be legally required to file an income tax return if your annual income does not exceed certain minimum amounts.


Annual Income Requirement

The obligation to file a federal income tax return depends on your annual income and tax filing status. When you file your tax return, you are granted a standard deduction based on your filing status and a personal exemption that is equal to $3,900 for the 2013 tax year. If your income for the year is less than your personal exemption and standard deduction, you don't have to file a return. For 2013, the standard deduction is $6,100 for single taxpayers and $12,200 for married people filing joint returns, which means you don't need to file a tax return if your income is under $10,000 as a single person or $20,000 as a joint filer.

Rules for Dependents

The income rules for filing a tax return are different for dependents than normal taxpayers. A dependent is a person who is financially reliant upon someone else, such as a child who lives with a parent and does not pay for at least half of his own support. Children under age 19 and full-time students under age 24 often qualify as dependents. If someone claims you as a dependent on a tax return, you cannot claim the personal exemption of $3,900. This means you have to file tax return if your income exceeds the standard deduction of $6,100. You also have to file if your unearned income was more than $950. Unearned income is cash you get from things other than a job, such as interest from savings accounts and dividends from stock investments.

Self-Employment Income

Self-employment income describes money you earn working as an independent contractor or profits you make as a business owner. You have to file an income tax return if you had $400 or more in self-employment income. You must also file if you had church employee income of $108.28 or more.

Voluntary Filing

Although you technically are not required to file a tax return if your income does not exceed the minimums set by the Internal Revenue Service, it may benefit you to file a return anyway. If you earn income from a job, your employer automatically takes a cut of your pay and sends it to the IRS for income tax purposes. Filing a tax return can allow you to get a portion of that money back as a tax refund.

References

Posted on 5:58 AM | Categories:

Is it time for your software company to switch from QuickBooks? Compliance / Vendor Specific Object Evidence of Fair Value / Business Intelligence / Scalability / IT Expense (The Case For Netsuite)

Kevin Lalor for Bi101 writes: 


Compliance

In 1965, the Byrds released their hit song “Turn! Turn! Turn! (to Everything There Is a Season)” and were rewarded with international recognition. The lyrics from the song are inspirational, which may be attributed to the fact that they are almost completely taken from the Book of Ecclesiastes in the Bible. No matter where the inspiration comes from, the message regarding a “time” and a “purpose” for “everything” resonates not just in life, but also in software. Looking at the life of a software company, it should be recognized that there is a time and purpose for QuickBooks and a time and purpose to change QuickBooks. At Bi101, we believe that when software companies are required to comply with FASB software revenue recognition rules, it is time to “Turn, Turn, Turn.”
When is the right time to "Turn, turn, Turn" from QuickBooks?
Created by Bi101
“A time to be born”
As a software solution, QuickBooks was designed to help small business with their accounting needs. By focusing on the problems of their target audience and adding helpful features throughout the years, they have been able to corner somewhere between 80%-90% of the small business accounting market.
More specifically, QuickBooks is a bookkeeping system. It allows small business to track sales, generate invoices, and perform payroll. For most small companies, it is the right software at the right price.
This is also true for small software companies. Most early stage software companies use QuickBooks because it is easy to hire skilled workers that are familiar with the system, thus cutting down on training costs. In addition, the software provides all of the basic accounting needs for the startup including payroll services, monthly reporting, and some general ledger capabilities.
But what happens when a small company grows up?
“A time to build up”
Hopefully within the software company’s life, a tipping point will be reached and there will be momentum to grow the business. With this momentum, there will be new demands on the accounting group including new compliance requirements.
Will QuickBooks scale when you reach the tipping point?
Courtesy of justintarte.com
To grow into a large software company, a firm will need capital. And to obtain capital, it will need to produce GAAP complaint financial statements. And to produce these statements, it will need to comply with FASB software revenue recognition rules.
Unfortunately, QuickBooks is not equipped to handle FASB software revenue recognition rules. Of course, a firm could always choose to calculate revenue schedules using a spreadsheet, but eventually this will either be too cumbersome or will require the hiring of additional full time employees.
Besides FASB software revenue recognition rules, QuickBooks was not designed to produce GAAP complaint financial statements. To produce these statements, a firm will have to purchase an additional reporting package.
QuickBooks cannot comply with FASB software revenue recognition rules
Courtsey of fasb.org
QuickBooks may have been a good solution in the beginning, but now your software company is growing.  QuickBooks is not really able to grow with the company. It is time to switch to something better. If you are interested in learning more, please contact us.
As we have noted in this posting, one main indicator that it is time to switch from QuickBooks is when investors, bankers, and vendors are requesting that firms comply with FASB software revenue recognition rules. But there are other indicators as well. Tomorrow, we will cover vendor specific object evidence (VSOE) as another indicator that it is time for your software company to switch.

Vendor Specific Object Evidence of Fair Value or VSOE.


Recently, I overheard a conversation between an entrepreneur and his mentor.  The entrepreneur had an idea for a company but was concerned about the legal framework necessary to be in business.  The mentor told this young man not to be concerned about business cards, incorporating, or any other compliance activities until he actually had a customer and a proven model.  Once these were up and running, there would be plenty of time to think about the legal and compliance framework necessary for business.
Mentors are important throughout the life of a business
Image from manasota.score.org
Some software founders may have received this same advice for their company.  Based on this advice, the founders may have purchased QuickBooks and began to record their accounting transactions within its databases.  However, the company may now have reached a point where compliance is more valuablethan the cost savings of noncompliance and it is time to migrate off of QuickBooks.  To illustrate this point, let’s determine the costs/benefits between compliance and noncompliance regarding Vendor Specific Object Evidence of Fair Value or VSOE.
Benefits of VSOE Noncompliance:  The main benefit of not complying with the revenue recognition rules regarding VSOE is the cost savings.  These cost savings may include software expense savings since the business will continue to use QuickBooks instead of a GAAP compliant system.  Other cost savings may include not having to hire additional full time employees to track VSOE within a spreadsheet.
Costs of VSOE Noncompliance:  Investors, Bankers, and vendors desire to work with businesses that are financially stable.  All of these groups are usually willing to take a discount in some form (lower interest rate, better terms, etc.) because financial stability lowers the risk of interaction.  Companies that choose not to comply with VSOE revenue recognition rules should expect the cost of capital to be more expensive since they cannot provide proof of stability.
Benefits of VSOE Compliance:  As noted above, software companies that comply with VSOE rules should expect a discount for cost of capital.  However, there are even more benefits than lower borrowing costs.  By establishing VSOE, software companies have created a tight band around pricing.  Based on the bell curve approach, to maintain VSOE the final price cannot move more than +/- 15%.  This reduces the amount of discounts that are given to customers too freely by the sales team.  In addition, VSOE compliance can make the company an attractive merger or takeover target if the founders are interested.
By Establishing VSOE, software companies keep prices in a set range
Image from Bi101
Costs of VSOE Compliance:  VSOE compliance is complicated and will require some cost outlays to obtain.  If management insists upon staying with QuickBooks, the accounting group may have to increase their employee headcount so that they can properly track all of the proper calculations within spreadsheets.  Or, if the company is ready to switch from QuickBooks, they may have to spend some capital on purchasing a new system.
Additional Benefits of VSOE
Image Created by Bi101
In our opinion, the benefits of VSOE compliance clearly outweigh the costs of compliance and the costs and benefits of noncompliance.  For managers that are weighing the costs and benefits of staying with QuickBooks verses moving to another system, you might want to consider NetSuite.  Besides all of the above mentioned benefits of VSOE compliance, other cost savings include a reduction of IT costs since the system is cloud based.  

Business Intelligence

Business decisions are made in many different ways. Some managers make a decision based on their “gut.” Others prefer to gather inputs from multiple individuals and evaluate the best alternative. Still others prefer to wait for some divine inspiration to lead them down the right path. However the decision is eventually made, the root of the decision is based on data inputs. Managers receive data, process the information, and then respond to the data with a decision. To be better decision makers, managers need to be aware of the source of their data. Those software companies running QuickBooks may find that the data supplied from the system isn’t sufficient to support whatever decision making process managers use.
Different Managers have different decision making styles
Courtesy of leadersprinciples.wordpress.com
Data Provided by QuickBooks
When it comes to obtaining the appropriate data, there are two major flaws with QuickBooks . First, the system is extremely limited in the amount of information that it stores. For example, when tracking software revenue recognition within QuickBooks, the only information captured within the system is the revenue journal entry. The system cannot track vendor specific object evidence calculations, track revenue recognition schedules, or automatically book revenue when milestones are completed.  With QuickBooks, tracking software revenue recognition is done in spreadsheets outside the system.
Another example is when a customer contacts billing regarding a project status or invoice. Instead of pulling this information up within the system, account managers have to search through multiple spreadsheets to provide the requested information. Since the necessary information is not stored directly within the system, retrieving information can be extremely cumbersome.
The second major flaw with QuickBooks is that all data has to be entered manually. If a customer changes their contact information, a clerk is required to type this information into the system. When a vendor changes an address, this has to be updated manually as well. The amount of manual input into the system and the time it takes to update this information means that some of the data within the system may be inaccurate or just wrong.
Software revenue recogntion should be automated and not entered manually
Courtesy of dilbert.com
The need for Business Intelligence
For software companies, the information necessary to make business decision is not in QuickBooks but is buried within other applications and databases. To gather the right information, employees must spend time gathering it in from disparate locations.  If you have reached the point in your business where you are spending time looking for business intelligence, it is time to switch from QuickBooks to a system that can provide the following:
  • Real Time Information – Information loaded through a batch job is too late. To gain a true competitive advantage, managers need access to information in real time. With real time updates, account managers know the specific details of a project down to the minute and can inform clients of the current status.
  • Workflow Automation – By automating business processes, employees are free to focus on other tasks while the system handles the transactions. The best example of this is in regards to software revenue recognition. Using the right system, software revenue recognition can be automated and revenue is recognized by the system when milestones are completed.
  • Self-Service Information – Instead of manually updating the information, it would be easier to allow customer and vendors self-service access. By outsourcing the data entry process to the customer and vendor directly, your internal employees are available to perform tasks for your company.
QuickBooks does not offer BI and automating software revenue recognition
Courtesy of computernetworksit.com.au
Better decisions can be made with business intelligence. For those software companies running QuickBooks, getting the right data from the system to make those decisions may be difficult. If you are interested in learning more about a system can provide automated software revenue recognition and better business intelligence, please contact us.
Today, we focused on the benefits of business intelligence and automating software revenue recognition.  Tomorrow, we will discuss scalability as another sign that it is time to migrate from QuickBooks.

Scalability

Last Friday, the television show “Shark Tank” returned to the small screen for a fifth season. For those of you unaware, the show allows entrepreneurs to pitch their business in front of America and five investors, or “sharks.” The sharks consist of wealthy individuals that have made fortunes and are now investors in other companies. The show is interesting because it allows people to learn more about what investors consider to be important in a business. One of the key questions that the “sharks” ask the entrepreneur is whether or not their business is “scalable.”
Software companies need to scale sales and compliance like GAAP revenue recognition
Courtesy of ssireview.org
When most business talk about scalability, they are usually talking about scaling sales. However, scaling a business means adjusting everything within a business to handle new customers including sales, compliance, and management reporting. Software companies that are still running QuickBooks will discover that the software cannot scale with their business in the following ways:
  • Sales: QuickBooks is usually a desktop application connected to a database. Under this configuration, users are actually limited in the amount of customer information they can store. When the database is filled up, no more customer information can be entered.
  • Compliance: We have noted previously that it is important for software companies to produce GAAP financial Statements if they are interested in working with investors, bankers, and vendors. In producing this information, the company needs to follow GAAP revenue recognition procedures and provide audit trails that capture the identity of the individuals entering the transactions. Currently, QuickBooks cannot comply with GAAP revenue recognition requirements meaning that most calculation are performed in spreadsheets. These spreadsheets are not equipped with the necessary audit trails.
Audit Trails are important for compliance purposes
Courtesy of financialrecorders.com
  • Management Reporting: As a business scales, more demands are placed on the financial system to provide management reports. With QuickBooks, the system is limited in the number of users that can access the system at any one time. With these limitations, access cannot be granted to managers to perform their own self servicing of reports.
To illustrate the importance of scalability, let’s examine further the GAAP revenue recognition rules. One of the difficult things about these rules is that they are constantly changing. GAAP revenue recognition rules for software companies began with SAB 104 and then became more complex with SOP 97-2. Even today, the rules continue to evolve with the announcement of the FASB and IASB joint statement on revenue recognition.
Since the majority of Intuit’s customers are not software companies, QuickBooks is not concerned aboutGAAP revenue recognition rules for software companies. They are not going to make adjustments to the software that will help software companies scale their compliance efforts. Instead, software companies are forced to use spreadsheets to try to be compliant. This may actually be worse since spreadsheets are less scalable then QuickBooks.
A system like NetSuite may take away some of the difficulties of scaling a business. NetSuite offers unlimited database size, audit trails, and built in GAAP revenue recognition rules. It also offers a suite of management reports that can be automated and updated in real time, and grants multiple users access to that data. 


IT Expense

There is a famous tale from India known as the blind men and the elephant. In the story, six blind men touch parts of an elephant to find out what it is like, but each one only touches one part. When they compare notes, one describes the tusks while another describes the legs, tail, head, etc. In the end, a man with sight has to describe the entire elephant in order for the blind men to understand the “big picture.”
What is QuickBook's true cost of ownership
Courtesy of davidhoglund.typepad.com
When it comes to understanding the IT cost of supporting QuickBooks, most software companies are like the blind men. They may claim they understand how much it costs, but they are only describing a part of it, primarily the licensing cost. If they were to step back and see the big picture, they would realize that the direct IT expense for supporting QuickBooks must include network connectivity, availability, security, database management, and backups/restores. The indirect IT expense for supporting QuickBooks may also include manual labor hours, contractors, time tracking systems, revenue recognition software, and any other additional systems that integrate directly with it. When looked at from the “big picture” perspective, QuickBooks can be a costly implementation.
To illustrate the point further, let’s examine the cost of the revenue recognition process under QuickBooks and the “big picture” required to support this process. The first expense that should be recognized is QuickBooks’ licensing expense. Since QuickBooks is the system of record, it is required revenue recognition software. However, as we have noted here previously, QuickBooks is a bookkeeping system and only records the final revenue calculation. The actual revenue recognition schedule is probably tracked somewhere else like a spreadsheet.
The expense of spreadsheet software is probably minimal and would be purchased anyway, so this is not an actual expense. What can be recognized as our second expense is the manual labor required to calculate and track the revenue recognition schedule. Depending upon the size of the software company, this may be performed by two or three additional accountants within the finance department. These accountants may dedicate upwards of 75% of their time tracking calculations like VSOE and determining when project milestones have been completed so that revenue can be recognized.
Without revenue recognition software, firms need to hire more accountants
Courtesy of gradschools.com
The third expense that should be included in our “big picture” is a percentage of the time the IT department spends on security and backup/restores. If QuickBooks and other revenue recognition software were not in place, then these additional expenses would not be required.
Once companies understand the “big picture” in regards to the expense of their QuickBooks implementation, they also realize that they have been paying a high price for minimal functionality. QuickBooks does not provide workflow, revenue recognition software automation, and business intelligence of any kind. And yet it is expensive.
QuickBooks total cost of ownership
Created by Bi101
When software companies look at the “big picture” around IT expense, they realize that it is time for a change. Overpaying for minimal functionality is a poor business decision, especially when there are alternatives. 
Posted on 5:57 AM | Categories:

Is a hand-written Federal tax return an audit magnet?

Over at Bogleheads we read:  Is a hand-written Federal tax return an audit magnet?

Is a hand-written Federal tax return an audit magnet?

Postby Liam » Fri Sep 27, 2013 3:41 pm
I am handwriting my Form 1040, then mailing it.

Would it be better if I typed it, then mailed? Or, submitted it using TurboTax (or similar)?

In short, does the submittal format matter?
Liam
Posts: 22
Joined: 10 Mar 2012

Re: Is a hand-written Federal tax return an audit magnet?

Postby chaz » Fri Sep 27, 2013 3:53 pm
Probably not if legible.
Chaz | | “Money is better than poverty, if only for financial reasons." Woody Allen | | http://www.bogleheads.org/wiki/index.php/Main_Page
chaz
Posts: 12056
Joined: 27 Feb 2007

Re: Is a hand-written Federal tax return an audit magnet?

Postby Electron » Fri Sep 27, 2013 3:54 pm
Many people use the PDF format tax forms available on the IRS website. You can fill in the forms using your computer and then print them.

http://www.irs.gov/Forms-&-Pubs

My understanding is that the pdf tax forms are optically scanned into their system. I don't believe a hand written form would trigger an audit by itself.
Last edited by Electron on Fri Sep 27, 2013 3:56 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Electron
User avatar
Electron
Posts: 805
Joined: 10 Mar 2007

Re: Is a hand-written Federal tax return an audit magnet?

Postby SeattleCPA » Fri Sep 27, 2013 3:55 pm
I don't know. Here's my guess though...

Completing a tax return by hand should not in and of itself increase the DIF score your tax return gets ... which important because your return's DIF score is what triggers an audit.

However, I would think that arithmetic errors (such as you might make if doing the return by hand) probably do jack your DIF score.

Also, I think the diagnostics that tax software uses to assess your return probably knocks down many other errors that might jack your DIF score.

My (unsolicited) advice: Unless the return is very easy, I would think using TurboTax makes sense.
SeattleCPA
Posts: 287
Joined: 6 Jul 2012
Location: Redmond, Washington

Re: Is a hand-written Federal tax return an audit magnet?

Postby chaz » Fri Sep 27, 2013 4:00 pm
SeattleCPA wrote:I don't know. Here's my guess though...

Completing a tax return by hand should not in and of itself increase the DIF score your tax return gets ... which important because your return's DIF score is what triggers an audit.

However, I would think that arithmetic errors (such as you might make if doing the return by hand) probably do jack your DIF score.

Also, I think the diagnostics that tax software uses to assess your return probably knocks down many other errors that might jack your DIF score.

My (unsolicited) advice: Unless the return is very easy, I would think using TurboTax makes sense.

TurboTax also makes it easy.
Chaz | | “Money is better than poverty, if only for financial reasons." Woody Allen | | http://www.bogleheads.org/wiki/index.php/Main_Page
chaz
Posts: 12056
Joined: 27 Feb 2007

Re: Is a hand-written Federal tax return an audit magnet?

Postby tadamsmar » Fri Sep 27, 2013 4:05 pm
This says hand-written returns flags with the IRS because math errors are more likely:

http://www.minyanville.com/trading-and- ... 3/id/47474

But remember that there are lots of kinds of IRS audits. Just having the IRS run math checks is not a big deal, or even automated cross checks. They might mail you a letter if corrections have to be arranged. Not the kind were the make you prove every number from your records.
User avatar
tadamsmar
Posts: 5391
Joined: 7 May 2007

Re: Is a hand-written Federal tax return an audit magnet?

Postby gtaylor » Fri Sep 27, 2013 4:07 pm
I did it by hand for many years, up to the mid 2000's. Never audited, even with a Sched C etc.

I did on one occasion have unambiguous math errors. The IRS computer just fixes them as it goes and spits out a letter and a check or a bill. I suppose if the numbers are very screwy they would trigger something less automatic, and obviously they would have to if the input, as opposed to computed, values were inconsistent somehow.
gtaylor
Posts: 262
Joined: 17 Feb 2009

Re: Is a hand-written Federal tax return an audit magnet?

Postby Quickfoot » Fri Sep 27, 2013 4:09 pm
TaxACT is considerably cheaper than TurboTax in most cases and does as good of a job. Unless someone lacks computer and Internet access or skills it's software makes it much easier.
Quickfoot
Posts: 174
Joined: 11 Jan 2013

Re: Is a hand-written Federal tax return an audit magnet?

Postby frugaltype » Fri Sep 27, 2013 5:16 pm
You mean hand filled out, not the form itself handwritten, I assume. Ive done mine thatt way for decades and never beenaidited. Sorry for typosudingtablet for first time.
User avatar
frugaltype
Posts: 765
Joined: 24 Apr 2013

Re: Is a hand-written Federal tax return an audit magnet?

Postby bottlecap » Fri Sep 27, 2013 5:19 pm
No. I have done it for years without incident. If they think you've miscalculated, they send you a notice, they don't audit you. If you omit something, that's another story...

JT
User avatar
bottlecap
Posts: 2731
Joined: 7 Mar 2007
Location: Tennessee

Re: Is a hand-written Federal tax return an audit magnet?

Postby tomd37 » Fri Sep 27, 2013 5:43 pm
I would think the content of the tax return determines the audit possibility. Also, I believe all hand prepared returns are still data entered by an IRS clerk (probably a temporary worker) and that situation might add to a possible error and possibly an increased audit possibility. Anyone know for sure how a handwritten return is entered in the system?
Tom D.
tomd37
Posts: 1505
Joined: 1 Mar 2007
Location: Brentwood, TN

Re: Is a hand-written Federal tax return an audit magnet?

Postby nordlead » Fri Sep 27, 2013 5:58 pm
I've heard that filing by paper increases your chances of audit due to increased chance of error. I doubt they use extra scrutiny. I also understand that paper submissions take longer to process. (Edit: I should say I doubt the rate of audit is higher if you take into account the higher rate of errors).

I personally use Turbo Tax (which does offer free federal) and pay for their service at it saves me time. They copy all of my forms from the previous year and all I have to do is enter the income/deductions(or whatever applies).
nordlead
Posts: 27
Joined: 12 Sep 2013

Re: Is a hand-written Federal tax return an audit magnet?

Postby Steelersfan » Fri Sep 27, 2013 6:12 pm
I did mine by hand for over 30 years without an audit. A lot of those years I had four or five forms, so not a simple return. I've done them the last five years with a PC program, and no audit.

I did make a math mistake on one of the hand written forms one year and got a notice from the IRS that I owed them a little money due to the mistake. I sent them a check, and that's the last I heard of it.

I think it's the numbers, their size and their accuracy that makes you audit prone, not what form you submit. When the IRS is deciding whether to audit you or not I'm pretty sure they're not looking at the form you submitted, but some electronic, internal version of it. And that's almost certainly after some computer program has screened it or selected it at random.
User avatar
Steelersfan
Posts: 1934
Joined: 19 Jun 2008

Re: Is a hand-written Federal tax return an audit magnet?

Postby gks » Fri Sep 27, 2013 6:32 pm
I made a mistake 15-20 years ago on a handwritten return. The IRS notified me of the mistake and adjusted our refund in our favor. Since then, I have been using Turbotax and Taxcut without any problems. 

Greg
Four out of the five Great Lakes prefer Michigan
gks
Posts: 48
Joined: 1 Dec 2012
Location: Michiana

Re: Is a hand-written Federal tax return an audit magnet?

Postby Spirit Rider » Fri Sep 27, 2013 7:28 pm
The general point is that you want to avoid a human being "reviewing" your return. Missing or incorrect information will cause the computer to reject your return and route it for a review. However, the review we are talking about is a review of the total content of the return.

It just so happens that my company is involved in large scale document imaging projects. We do not have the IRS project, but this is likely how manual returns would be processed.

Paper returns are scanned and imaged. They will attempt to process them automatically by forms recognition and OCR. Printed forms from tax return software or the IRS fillable forms will get read automatically. I do not know if they attempt to do handprint recognition. It tends to have low accuracy rates. So assume some->all handwritten returns get data entered from the form image. However, do not consider this a "review". It is a data entry clerk, who only cares about typing in what's on line 22. There is nothing at this stage that will get your return audited.

As others have said it would only be if there were form errors, the information illegible, or the data entry process was incorrect, that your return would get flagged for review. However, the big advantage of using a preparation software is that in reconciles inter and intra form entries and applies all IRS regulations to those entries.
Spirit Rider
Posts: 622
Joined: 2 Mar 2007

Re: Is a hand-written Federal tax return an audit magnet?

Postby Grt2bOutdoors » Fri Sep 27, 2013 7:34 pm
True story - years ago, colleagues of my parents claimed their "tax guy" would always get them refunds, whilst my parents were always paying because I was doing their taxes incorrectly. :annoyed So, my folks took their taxes to get prepared by this yo-yo, well, long story short, their professionally prepared tax return was prepared long hand in very illegible scribble with all sorts of "made up deductions and credits" on "duplicate" paper. After reviewing their newly done taxes that they paid $150 for, I explained "calmly" :annoyed that if they mailed in those tax returns they would with nearly 100% certainty be audited, and if that audit found any problems, the IRS could review past returns as well and it would likely cost them thousands. I wound up tossing the scribble and re-doing the taxes.
"Luck is not a strategy"
Grt2bOutdoors
Posts: 7641
Joined: 5 Apr 2007
Location: New York

Re: Is a hand-written Federal tax return an audit magnet?

Postby manwithnoname » Fri Sep 27, 2013 8:43 pm
tadamsmar wrote:This says hand-written returns flags with the IRS because math errors are more likely:

http://www.minyanville.com/trading-and- ... 3/id/47474

But remember that there are lots of kinds of IRS audits. Just having the IRS run math checks is not a big deal, or even automated cross checks. They might mail you a letter if corrections have to be arranged. Not the kind were the make you prove every number from your records.


Of course H & R Block wants you to think that hand written returns are more likely to be audited then electronic returns because H & R block wants to prepare more tax returns and charge you for them. 

However the math of audit risk for hand written returns does not compute. About 145M tax returns were filed last year and 80% were field electronically. That means 29M were either handwritten or filed out in PDF. IRS only audits about 1% of all returns (1.6M). So what percentage of hand written forms are audited. Maybe 1% because that is % of returns with income of no more than $200k that were audited. Audits can be for minor issues. 10 years ago I was audited because I failed to report an IRA rollover on the 1040. IRS taxed it as a distribution. I filled out the audit response form and included the 1099-R. IRS closed the file. 

http://2012taxes.org/how-does-the-irs-c ... o-to-audit
manwithnoname
Posts: 304
Joined: 22 Jul 2013

Re: Is a hand-written Federal tax return an audit magnet?

Postby Johm221122 » Fri Sep 27, 2013 9:03 pm
I have always done mine by hand, never had problem.
John
Johm221122
Posts: 3804
Joined: 13 May 2011

Re: Is a hand-written Federal tax return an audit magnet?

Postby sharke » Fri Sep 27, 2013 9:42 pm
gtaylor wrote:I did it by hand for many years, up to the mid 2000's. Never audited, even with a Sched C etc.

I did on one occasion have unambiguous math errors. The IRS computer just fixes them as it goes and spits out a letter and a check or a bill. I suppose if the numbers are very screwy they would trigger something less automatic, and obviously they would have to if the input, as opposed to computed, values were inconsistent somehow.

This was my experience as well. I finally switched to taxact (online) about two years ago and have been very pleased with it.
sharke
Posts: 31
Joined: 25 Apr 2012

Re: Is a hand-written Federal tax return an audit magnet?

Postby Toons » Fri Sep 27, 2013 11:07 pm
chaz wrote:
SeattleCPA wrote:I don't know. Here's my guess though...

Completing a tax return by hand should not in and of itself increase the DIF score your tax return gets ... which important because your return's DIF score is what triggers an audit.

However, I would think that arithmetic errors (such as you might make if doing the return by hand) probably do jack your DIF score.

Also, I think the diagnostics that tax software uses to assess your return probably knocks down many other errors that might jack your DIF score.

My (unsolicited) advice: Unless the return is very easy, I would think using TurboTax makes sense.

TurboTax also makes it easy.
Posted on 5:57 AM | Categories: