Friday, October 18, 2013

Miss the Final Oct. 15 Tax Deadline? Here's What You Must Do

Bonnie Lee for DailyFinance writres: According to the IRS, more than 12 million individuals requested the automatic six-month extension. Whether all of them complied and filed to hit their new deadline is another matter. If you missed the deadline for filing, you will be penalized unless you fall into the following categories:
  1. You are a member of the military or others serving in Afghanistan or other combat zone. You are granted an additional 180 days after leaving the combat zone to both file returns and pay any taxes due.
  2. People with extensions in parts of Colorado affected by severe storms, flooding, landslides and mudslides have until Dec. 2, 2013 to file and pay.
Not having the funds to cover your tax liability is not a viable excuse for not filing a return. Not only will you incur a failure-to-pay penalty if you fail to file a return, but you will also suffer a failure-to-file penalty. If you owe money to the IRS, immediately file the tax return to minimize the failure-to-file penalty.

According to the IRS, the failure-to-file penalty is generally more than the failure-to-pay penalty. You can reduce additional interest and penalties by paying as much as you can with your tax return. Try for a loan or file IRS Form 9465 to set up an installment agreement to make payments. The IRS will work with you.

Through the Fresh Start Program, taxpayers can set up a payment agreement with the IRS online within a matter of minutes. If you owe less than $50,000, simply go to Individuals Online Payment Agreement Application and follow the step-by-step process to set up a payment plan.

The penalty for filing late is normally 5% of the unpaid taxes for each month or part of a month that a tax return is late. That penalty starts accruing the day after the tax filing due date and will not exceed 25% of your unpaid taxes.

The Fresh Start Program is also designed to allow taxpayers suffering undue hardships to skip payment of taxes while they get their lives back in order. Simply contact the IRS and ask to be deemed currently noncollectable. You will be required to provide information about your finances in order for them to evaluate your request.
Posted on 10:21 AM | Categories:

Intuit's Quickbooks primes for an Aussie assault

Harrison Polites for BusinessSpectator writes: The race to lead Australia's small business sector onto the cloud is about to heat up, with an American juggernaut priming for a push to dominate the country's cloud-based account software market. 
Intuit's Quickbook launched in Australia last year, and has spent the past 12 months observing Australian businesses and tweaking its software for the market. 
Now, a week out from the launch of its new HTML 5, web-app based accounting product QuickBooks Online, it's newly-appointed vice president and managing director of Intuit Asia Pacific, Brad Paterson told Technology Spectator that he's looking to knock out rivals and establish dominance in the market. 
"We're number one in the US, I fully expect that we will be number one in Australia overtime," Mr Patterson said. 
He added that aims to double the size of its local team by the end of the year, launch new marketing initiatives and "accelerate exponentially" from here on out. 
Quickbooks faces some tough competition in the Australian market. 
And another rival New Zealand based cloud accounting company, Xero, recently reported signs that its making a significant dent on that lead, saying that gained 24,000 of a total 70,000 Australian users in the past five months.
Globally, Mr Patterson said that Quickbooks has around 1.3 million customers - the majority of which are in the US. He declined to go into detail about the firm's Australian user base, saying the company does not breakdown its users by region. 
Mr Patterson also confirmed that Quickbooks is not looking to steal customers off its rivals, but is instead intending to go after small businesses that still use "shoeboxes of receipts" and "XL spreadsheets" to manage their finances. 
The company's own research tells them that despite MYOB and Xero's efforts, around 50 per cent of Australian small businesses still manage their enterprise in this manner. 
Posted on 8:15 AM | Categories:

Why was KashFlow acquired? / Should you care?

Den Howlett for Diginomica writes: I am currently in Las Vegas so missed the news that KashFlow was acquired by IRIS earlier today (my time.)
As someone who has followed the cloud accounting market since its early days back on 2005 I have had good access to much of the activity in this space so it is interesting to see the speculation surrounding this transaction.
Phill Robinson, CEO of IRIS Software Group, said that as a combined entity it would be aiming at the thousands of small businesses in the UK that were struggling with bookkeeping, payroll and accountancy issues.
“KashFlow’s superb cloud services are the perfect fit with our existing suite of products and I am confident that this will enable IRIS to strengthen its leading position in cloud software for UK SMEs and accountancy firms,” he said.
It’s easy to think that the answer is “money”, but it’s not. Money is easy to come by when you’re growing as quickly as we are, more so in a rapidly growing market. But money is just an enabler; it takes time to successfully turn hard cash into real benefits. Instead, I tried to work out what we’d be trying to achieve with a cash injection….
We have a unique product for accountants that, in addition to helping them manage their clients, also helps us to access more SMEs. Being able to access a large slice of the accountants in the UK would really accelerate our growth.
Yes Duane – I’m sure it’s not about the money ;)
Next, let’s review what others are thinking. At AccountingWeb, ‘redman7 ‘offers this perspective:
I got the impression Iris were closely tied in with FreeAgent so this seems a little odd…
It sounds like going forwards Kashflow will be more of a priority to Iris than FreeAgent. I don’t know how bothered I am by this as I am happy to deal with FreeAgent directly - Iris’s customer support of their OpenBooks product is shockingly bad compared to the direct customer support provided by FreeAgent (which is awesome). It’s only the cheaper prices I can get through Iris OpenBooks vs directly with FreeAgent which helps.
I’ve never used Kashflow as I’m happy with FreeAgent for simple clients and Xero for more complicated ones.
I’d definitely agree with that statement and wouldn’t be surprised if either a) Iris cooled their interest in FA over time or b) Kashflow was taken in a very different direction.  As for the cheaper prices, i’m sure Iris will again offer a OpenBooks style discount once the integration’s underway.
So much from the peanut gallery and good insights into ‘on the ground’ experience. Over at FreeAgent, the company announced FreeAgent Friendly for accountants. CEO Ed Molyneux says:
From today, we’ll be directly providing our award-winning cloud software to accountancy practices, and increasing investment to extend our world-class support to accountants as well as their clients.

What’s the reality?

FreeAgent has been through several rounds of funding. IRIS took an early substantial but minority stake which, as far as I am aware, it still holds. Part of that deal provided IRIS with exclusive distribution rights to the accounting market. In essence, FreeAgent took money in exchange for a restricted end user market position.
Most recently, my understanding is that FreeAgent was considering a fresh funding round which could have involved IRIS’s ultimate holding company. I am not privy to the terms of any deal but the IRIS deal was not bringing in the kind of numbers that were originally thought possible. This does not surprise me because the bag carriers for IRIS were not motivated to sell a SaaS solution. That left both sides in an awkward position.
The acquisition of KashFlow solves that problem for IRIS because KashFlow already has a good number of accounting practitioners under its belt. Now it has IRIS’s financial muscle to put its foot on the gas in that market.
From KashFlow’s perspective, it had already established a baseline valuation since Jackson had made a small divestment earlier in the year. KashFlow’s original financier, Lord Young is elderly. It would therefore make sense for him to achieve an exit around about now.
KashFlow only has a small clutch of shareholders all of whom were sitting on potentially huge gains so when Jackson says money isn’t an issue you can be sure he’s talking nonsense. There’s also the small matter of positioning.
KashFlow has been losing its early lead for some time. FreeAgent’s wholly organic growth and loyal following has served it well. Xero, which recently took $150 million in fresh funding looks like it will steal the top slot in the next couple of years. That left the number two slot up for grabs. Add in the fact that Jackson has been publicly hinting for some time that he’d like to do other things and you can see a perfect storm.
In short – the FreeAgent /IRIS arrangement wasn’t working out. Xero was becoming a major threat, KashFlow was on the block and voila. A deal was in the wind.

What does it mean?

If IRIS plays this well then it can use KashFlow as the vehicle to fuel a much needed replacement market. At one level, KashFlow is a much simpler product than its immediate competitors but make no mistake – it is competitive. IRIS will have to accelerate development to make it a truly compelling offering for professionals acting for very small businesses.
Xero is unaffected. It already has a solid play with the new breed of accountant that wants to do things differently. That’s paying off in spades and with a massive war chest behind it, can out gun the competition should the company so choose.
FreeAgent remains a potent force but it now has to build the professional channel from scratch. That’s a different market to the one that Xero goes after and the one to which IRIS aspires. FreeAgent has the advantage of some capabilities like payroll and tax calculation that make it a very compelling solution for a target group that is sufficiently large for it to command a strong position in the market.  It is also far more innovative in the way it develops features than its competitors and that in turn may prove highly attractive to innovative professionals.
In other words – with the exception of Xero, the next slot is up for grabs and while it is unclear which of KashFlow and FreeAgent can win that slot, both can do very well. As always, I will be watching this with interest. One thing I can say for certain – IRIS wins whichever way because it already has gains it can tap out of its FreeAgent investment but will not wish to see those wither as it promotes KashFlow.  Quite how IRIS explains this in the market is another matter.
Disclosure: I was an early investor in FreeAgent. My wife is an investor in FreeAgent. I have no current knowledge of that investment value.
Posted on 8:06 AM | Categories:

Time Running Out To Disclose Foreign Accounts

Jeffrey A. Goldman for Husch Blackwell LLP writes:  More and more financial institutions outside of the U.S. are going to be disclosing the names of their U.S. account holders to the IRS as a result of the implementation of the 2010 Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act (FATCA). FATCA forces foreign financial institutions to disclose the names of their U.S. account holders, possibly beginning as early as mid-2014.


In addition, countries that previously protected the secrecy of bank accounts are not only supporting the implementation of FATCA, but are also cooperating with the U.S. to further encourage their banks to disclose U.S. account holders. On August 29, 2013, the U.S. Department of Justice announced a program designed to encourage Swiss banks to come forward and, among other things, provide detailed information regarding U.S. account holders. The Swiss Federal Department of Finance and the Department of Justice released a joint statement stating that Switzerland will encourage its banks to participate in the program.
U.S. taxpayers who have foreign accounts and have not informed the IRS of the existence of these accounts, even though they are required to do so, must now deal with some hard truths:
  • Taxpayers Are Required to Disclose Foreign Accounts
  • Penalties for Failure to Disclose Are Severe
  • Taxpayers Should Act Quickly to Evaluate Participation in the Disclosure Program
It is critical that taxpayers with undisclosed foreign accounts focus now on these issues and actions — which could be the difference between avoiding penalties and costly punishments.

I. Taxpayers Are Required to Disclose Foreign Accounts

The Bank Secrecy Act has long required U.S. taxpayers to disclose amounts held in non-U.S. financial accounts in excess of $10,000 by filing Form TD F 90-22.1. The form, known as the FBAR form, must be received by the IRS by June 30 following any year in which the $10,000 threshold is met. The filing deadline cannot be extended, and the IRS can take up to six years from the original filing date to assess penalties for failure to file the FBAR form.

II. Penalties for Failure to Disclose Are Severe

The penalties for failing to file the FBAR form are severe, and can even include criminal sanctions. Non-willful violations expose the taxpayer to fines as high as $10,000 for each year the taxpayer fails to file a required FBAR form. The penalty for willful failure to file is generally the greater of $100,000 or 50 percent of the maximum amount held in all non-U.S. accounts during the year. For example, if a taxpayer has $250,000 in a foreign account for four years and does not file the FBAR form or report interest income earned by the account each year, the IRS could assess a $500,000 FBAR penalty if the failure was willful. There are some mitigation guidelines that may reduce the penalty, and the taxpayer may avoid the penalty altogether by showing that the failure to file was due to reasonable cause.
Although the IRS claims that finding willfulness requires significant evidence of wrongdoing based on all the facts and circumstances, one Court intimated that the simple failure to correctly answer a question about foreign accounts on a taxpayer's return (by checking the wrong box) is sufficient to establish willfulness.
Criminal penalties are also possible, and can include fines of up to $500,000 and/or 10 years in prison. While rare, criminal prosecutions relating to FBAR violations do occur.

The Offshore Voluntary Disclosure Program

Beginning in 2009, the IRS established a series of "Offshore Voluntary Disclosure Programs" to encourage taxpayers to come forward and disclose their non-U.S. accounts, pay reduced penalties, and avoid criminal prosecution. The current program requires taxpayers to file delinquent FBAR forms and amended income tax returns disclosing undeclared income, and pay tax and penalties going back eight years. In order to be eligible for the program, taxpayers must submit a request for participation in the program before the IRS begins an audit or even receives the taxpayer's name from the foreign financial institution.

Taxpayers must also pay a single FBAR penalty equal to 27.5 percent of the highest aggregate balance held outside of the U.S. over the previous eight years. In addition, while the normal FBAR penalty applies only to non-U.S. financialaccounts, the voluntary disclosure penalty applies to the value of any foreign assets that either produced undeclared income or were purchased with undeclared funds. For example, if the taxpayer has rental property overseas and did not declare the rental income, the value of the rental property will be included in the penalty calculation.

The penalty does not apply to any accounts or assets unrelated to tax noncompliance, i.e., assets that did not earn undeclared income and were not funded or purchased with untaxed funds. Also, the penalty under the voluntary disclosure program applies only once, rather than each year, which may significantly reduce the taxpayer's potential FBAR penalties. However, in certain cases it may be less expensive for taxpayers to simply file delinquent FBAR forms and pay the standard penalty rather than participating in the voluntary disclosure program, especially if the amounts held overseas are small and the taxpayer's actions were not willful.

III. Taxpayers Should Act Quickly to Evaluate Participation in the Disclosure Program

The 2010 Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act will force many non-U.S. financial institutions to disclose their U.S. account holders beginning in mid-2014. Moreover, the recent joint statement released by the United States and Switzerland and the Swiss bank disclosure program instituted by the United States are strong evidence of the United States' determination to uncover and prosecute those with undisclosed accounts who do not come forward.
These U.S. taxpayers, some of whom may not even be aware of their obligation to disclose the accounts, may be running out of time to take appropriate action before the IRS takes its own.

IRS Required Statement

Pursuant to recently-promulgated U.S. Treasury Department Regulations, we are now required to advise you that, unless otherwise expressly stated, any federal tax advice contained in this communication, including attachments and enclosures, is not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of (i) avoiding tax-related penalties under the Internal Revenue Code or (ii) promoting, marketing or recommending to another party any tax-related matters addressed herein.
Posted on 7:43 AM | Categories:

You Have Six Weeks to Make This Tax-Saving Trade

Alexander Green for ETF Daily News writes:  In December 1996, I sold a big position in Best Buy (NYSE: BBY) at a loss. I still consider it one of the most boneheaded investment moves I ever made. A year later thestock was up more than fivefold. A few years further on, it was up more than thirtyfold.

I didn’t dislike the business prospects for Best Buy at the time. I sold it only because I had taken substantial capital gains elsewhere in my portfolio and was cleaning out anything I could find at a loss to offset them.
It ended up being a costly mistake. Despite what your tax advisor may tell you, you should never cash out of an investment for tax reasons alone. Nor do you have to. There’s a smarter way to protect your gains from the prying hands of the IRS.
The IRS allows you to offset realized gains with realized losses each calendar year. (And take an additional $3,000 against earned income.) If you sell for tax purposes, however, you must wait at least 30 days before buying the same shares back. Otherwise you run afoul of the wash-sale rule.
Offsetting gains at the end of the year is often a sensible move. Most stocks are not appreciably higher 30 days later. If you still like them, you can buy them back then.
There is a risk, however, and it’s called the “January effect.” The first month of the year is traditionally a strong one for the market. A lot of pension and IRA money gets invested early each year. Plus, there is often a rebound from the tax-loss selling that goes on each December.
If a stock you own soars in January, there is a natural reluctance to buy it back. The temptation is to wait until it comes back down. But what if it doesn’t? You’ve taken a limited loss but sold an investment with unlimited upside potential.
There is a way around this problem, however. And you can take advantage of it – but only if you’re willing to move in the next six weeks.
Each fall, I look at my non-retirement accounts for stocks that are trading below my entry price but not near my trailing stops. If I still like a stock, I often make the decision to double down on it for 30 days.
Why? Because I can sell the original shares at the end of December for a tax loss. And if the stock rallies in January, it’s not a problem. After all, thanks to my purchase in October or November, I still own the same number of shares I bought originally – and I now have a lower cost basis as well.
What if you don’t have the cash to double down on your position? Use margin. Again, I’m recommending this only for a 30-day period. So your margin interest charge would be minimal.
The risk, of course, is that your shares will be worth less in late December and you will have a paper loss on the second purchase.
However, just the opposite may happen. Remember, the January effect is often preceded by the Santa Claus rally, the tendency of the stock market to do well in the second half of December. As a result, you could end up with a smaller loss on your original shares and a paper gain on your second purchase.
(The Santa Claus rally and the January effect, while real seasonal trading patterns, are never certain of course, and another reason why you should add to only those companies whose earnings prospects remain strong.)
Bear in mind, when selling for tax purposes, the IRS requires that you buy those identical shares AT LEAST 30 days before you sell the others. So if you want to use this strategy for 2013, you must act over the next six weeks.
If we have the traditional mid-December to early February rally, you’ll thank me. And again, perhaps, on April 15.
Good investing,
Posted on 7:43 AM | Categories:

Lessons Learned From The Short-Lived Computer Services Tax

Richard W. Giuliani and Julie Hogan Rodgers for Wilmer Hale writes: As has been widely reported, the newly enacted statute expanding the Massachusetts sales tax to cover certain computer and software services (the "Computer Services Tax") has been repealed after a substantial outcry from businesses, the Massachusetts Taxpayers Foundation and others. The appeal is retroactive.1 During the short-lived life of the Computer Services Tax, the Department of Revenue (DOR) issued several documents intended to provide guidance on the application of the tax, including a list of frequently asked questions.

What is notable about the questions is the apparent lack of knowledge among many existing businesses that their product may already be subject to the sales and use tax prior to the enactment of the Computer Services Tax. Based on the DOR's responses to a number of frequently asked questions, it appears that some businesses may not have been aware of the following:
  • Under existing law, sales and licenses of prewritten software are subject to Massachusetts sales and use tax. Since April 1, 2006, they have been subject to tax even if the prewritten software is electronically transferred or accessed through the Internet. Consequently, an online seller of software would be required to collect the sales and/or use tax from Massachusetts consumers of their prewritten software product even if not downloaded by the consumer.  
  • The sale of prewritten software and upgrades is taxable under existing law, although installation is not subject to tax when billed for separately.  
  • In general, sales by Software-as-a-Service vendors are treated as sales of access to prewritten software, which is taxable under existing law.  
  • Licensing of software is treated as a sale subject to the sales and use tax.  
  • The sales tax applies to all vendors, whether they are sole proprietors, corporations or other forms of business entity.  
  • Installation of firewalls and spam filtering services for which the vendor charges a monthly fee is subject to tax under existing law.

Conclusion

Despite the repeal of the Computer Services Tax, many vendors need to determine whether their existing product is subject to sales and use tax. This requires the sometimes difficult determination of whether the vendor's software is being sold or just used by the vendor in providing a nontaxable service. For more information regarding this determination, see our prior client alert. In TIR 13-7, the Massachusetts DOR indicated it will be issuing additional guidance in the near future on this determination. In the meantime, the determination may require obtaining expert advice from the vendor's tax advisor or seeking a ruling from the Massachusetts DOR.
Posted on 7:42 AM | Categories: