Sunday, November 10, 2013

Who owns a slice of Xero pie?

Hamish Fletcher for the NZ Herald writes: A Facebook billionaire, an investment company tied to a charitable trust working with Australian Aboriginal communities, and TradeMe founder Sam Morgan are among the largest holders of Xero shares which have soared more than 500 per cent in the past year.
Rod Drury, the founder and chief executive of the online-accounting software firm, is its biggest individual shareholder and holds a 17 per cent share of the company, according to a Bloomberg register.
Based on Xero's closing share price on Friday, his stake in the company is worth $764 million.
Xero's second largest shareholder is Givia Pty, which holds 14.47 per cent.
Givia is a trustee of the Yajilarra Trust, which does a lot of philanthrophy work with Aboriginal communities, according to Xero chief financial officer Ross Jenkins.
Xero director Craig Winkler, who co-founded now rival accounting software firm MYOB in 1991, is also a trustee of Yajilarra Trust, Jenkins said.
Massachusetts-based venture capital firm Matrix Partners holds 9 per cent.
Facebook billionaire Peter Thiel, who also co-founded e-commerce business PayPal in 1999, is in Xero's top five with a stake of 6.69 per cent.
Hamish Edwards, who co-founded Xero with Drury, holds 4.54 per cent while Xero director and TradeMe founder Sam Morgan holds 4 per cent.
Fidelity Investments, a Boston-based financial services firm with US$1.7 trillion of assets under management, sneaks into Xero's top 10 with 0.62 per cent of the shares.
Blackrock, which calls itself "the world's largest asset manager" with US$3.8 trillion under its umbrella, owns 0.37 per cent of the shares. Auckland-based Milford Asset Management is within the top 20 with 0.11 per cent or 138,818 of the firm's shares.
Posted on 5:30 PM | Categories:

Does Xero have what it takes to become the 'Facebook of business' ?

Bernard Hickey looks at whether Xero has what it takes to become the 'Facebook of business'.   Bernard Hickey for Interest.co.nz writes: It's been a while since we've had this much excitement around a company on our stock market.  People on the street were talking about it, or more accurately, tweeting about it. Around 1 pm on Thursday shares in Xero hit NZ$41 on the NZX, valuing the accounting software firm at NZ$5.3 billion. This pushed it above Auckland Airport and Telecom to make it New Zealand's second most valuable listed company behind Fletcher Building.


This is astonishing on so many levels.  Fletcher Building, which is worth around NZ$6.5 billion, has 18,830 workers, annual revenues of around NZ$8.5 billion and is on track to produce earnings before interest and tax this financial year of up to NZ$650 million.   Meanwhile, Xero had revenues of just NZ$28.7 million in the six months to September 30, albeit they almost doubled in the last year. Xero had just 507 staff as at August 1, although that number is rising almost daily as it ramps up.

It has never made a profit.
It's an old joke now that Xero is its name and its profit line. How on earth, or even in this universe, can a company with so little track record be worth so much?
The answer is all about Xero's potential to become, as CEO Rod Drury described it this week, the "Facebook of Business."

International investment bank Credit Suisse this week even called Xero the "Apple of Accounting."
These are extraordinary aspirations, but Xero has a good shot at it and it has some very high-powered backers with decades of experiencing building just such Internet behemoths.

They include the likes of Paypal co-founder and early Facebook investor Peter Thiel, TradeMe founder Sam Morgan and the founder of Australian accounting software group MYOB, Craig Winkler.

Xero really took off after it raised US$150 million in an apparent blink of an eye in October from Thiel and other US and local investors. The first paragraph of the announcement of the capital raising set out their ambition -- to take on and beat US giant Intuit in the contest for 29 million customers there.

No New Zealand has ever had a real shot at dominating a part of a global market before.
Some may wonder how a relatively small New Zealand company could do it and why the unsexy business of small business accounting could be so lucrative.

Xero's 'ecosystem' of add-on services is the key and it has the potential to create a flowering of many, many cloud computing companies in New Zealand.

Xero loves helping and working with these 'add-on' companies, which include the likes of point-of-sale cloud software firm Vend and GeoOp, which makes software for tradies to book and invoice jobs on the move.

GeoOp listed on the junior NZAX market last month at NZ$1 and quickly sprinted to as high as NZ$3.64 this week. Investors who think about how small businesses operate for a moment or two are quickly realising Xero could become the centre of everything business does online and in the cloud, ranging from payrolls to invoicing and payments.

These are rocket ship rides for investors and a huge boost for our stock market, which for too long was seen as a moribund place full of mature dividend-producing laggards.

It's also much more encouraging than the last time New Zealand's stock market was generating this sort of excitement. Back in the mid 1980s the market's rock stars were property developing financiers who borrowed and bought everything with the hope of selling it on at a profit.

Now the likes of Xero and GeoOp make real services that are being sold directly in huge global markets.
It will be a roller coaster ride, but it's one New Zealand investors need to see up close and personal.

They may even jump on for fun.
-

11 Comments (visit the site to add to the comments)

Remember the saying..if anything is too good to be true ?
Still, it is nice that this company has been noticed and has had a good ride so far...May be wise to cash in when the going is good ?
Remember Rakon ? For every buyer, there is a seller laughing his way to the bank.
Zero will end up as did Poseidon - and there will be a great wailing and gnashing of teeth.
Ergophobia
Yep. A buy out or take over will give very good returns for existing shareholders.
Current operational financials do not add up.
That is a risky position to be in. I would not be betting the housekeeping money on it.

No.

But nonetheless, yet another fortuitous step (for some) toward improving morale before the onset of tighter monetary conditions.

If its not a bubble it will do till the bubble gets here....
This speaks of the investors, less the company.. its a wall of money there...
For what xero does it does it very well compared to others. Thought its not like suburban accountants live high on the hog. Rising above that will be tuff, we remember SAP family/insiders bought some SI farms a yr or two ago and the army of sap experts at $2,000 + a day often prove hard to move on
As an aside google sap on demand to see even the experts can drop s few billion on occasion.

Hoping wise heads use the publicity to secure many more much needed paying customers.
"The astonishing rise of Xero"  or should that headline be "The astonishing rise of Xero share price'   There is a difference.
It might well be a good company.  Hopefully after all the dust settles it will still be there and thriving.  But it does have a chance of being royally screwed by the share traders and NZX marketers and the trouble they cause.
It  was a one way bet after the capital raising, it finally showed those on the inside put their money where the market pitch was, it was a long time coming.
Anyone with common sense should have taken some money off the table by now. A lot of orginal and post-capital raising investors have made good money...actully twice now...a lot have bought in twice and now exited which is great. The expectations are now so high they have a real challange to make the revenue and utlimately profit targets that will go with maintaining the share price.
The easy way out would be a takeover. Good for the investors..so good for NZ?



 
Xero is probably the only thing that makes the residential property market look rational.

It's fantastic we have a company who is going great guns and building something.  But it hasn't yet succeeded, and all this back slapping of success smacks of immaturity.  Dont forget in its last financial year it had revenue of only $39m, and from the looks of it will only produce revenue of $70m, and massive losses.

I'm all for what xero is trying to do - but it's share price and enamored industry commentators is just another sad example of the financial illiteracy of our kiwi culture.
As a xero user for a good few years now I would say that the product works just great. That is a fact. The only thing that troubles me is "who owns the data, yes it is my data but, it turns out I am not actually the subscriber, my accountant is. Now that does not sit well with me, my accountant can turn around and deny me access to my own data. If I want to move accountants I have to ask my old accountant for permission. If I ask xero to make me the subscriber not my accountant they say to ask my accountant. So as a user I am having a few doubts all of a sudden.
I hope this succeeds. Our very own Infosys potentially. The only question I have is that if this business goes on to great success will it need to out source the bulk of its labour to stay ahead of the game? The real benefit to NZ would be for Xero to have 20000 highly skilled, highly paid employees based in NZ. Then we'd certainly start to see the beginnings of a more productive economy. The profits coming into NZ will be great but the labour share even better.
xero enthusiasm is what I have for sinking any hard earned cash in a IT company,even profitable ones- let alone monsta loss makers!
Just look at good 'ol Blackberry when it muffed it competing vs the i-phones etc
Posted on 7:44 AM | Categories:

Xero can win / 7 scenarios for Xero - each turning on its degree of success in the crucial US market - and what those mean Xero's share price.

Chris Keal for the National Business Review writes:  A new analyst report paints seven customer scenarios for Xero - each turning on its degree of success in the crucial US market - and what those mean for the super-hot tech's already heated share price.
Some are rosy. A couple are pretty ugly.
But before we get to that:
Xero will win in the software market?

I think it’s likely.
In the US, it faces a monolithic incumbent, Intuit – whose personal finance (Quicken) and small business accounting software (QuickBooks), hold a near-monopoly.
But Xero’s been in this position before in Australasia, against MYOB, and the UK, against Sage.
In both cases it didn’t spend a cent on traditional advertising, instead assiduously courting accountants, who in turn influence the software chosen by their clients.
Along with smart use of social media (both for general boosterism and stealing customers) and frequent media appearances this strategy has created buzz around Xero’s pure-play cloud software at a time when MYOB, Sage and other established players are juggling online and offline products.
The situation is different in the US. Where MYOB made a net loss last year and is lumbered with $A693 million in debt, Intuit (market cap: $US20.5 billion) made a net profit of $US858 million on revenue of $US4.2 billion in the year to July 31, 2013. It has just over $US1 billion in the bank.
You could spend almost limitless amounts of money trying to break into the US. But Xero’s strategy of courting accountants at its own events (it has a roadshow making five stops in California this week) and trade conferences is relatively low-cost.
And even CEO Rod Drury’s tactic of working the press is lower cost than usual. There’s no PR company engaged, or buying ads that get you (cough) on the radar. Rather, Drury is simply good at making news, and is always on the end of the phone. Crucially for Xero (and any shareholders wondering what happens if Rod gets hit by a bus), the company’s US-based President, Jamie Sutherland, is no slouch on this front either, having recently garnered coverage in Fortune magazine and on Bloomberg TV, among other appearances.
Drury has gathered smart people around him. He’s consistently proved good at picking trends. His plan to add new front-office modules to Xero (such as HR) is a good one, and the company’s strategy of creating an eco-system of apps around a Xero platform is solid, and seems to be gathering momentum (on October 3, Xero said  the number of add-on applications globally is 300, up from 160 a year ago).
Cash burn is high – $9.4 million in the June quarter and $14 million in the September quarter – and accelerating as Xero piles on staff (the company has around 600 and is in the process of adding another 100; Drury says numbers could double over the next year).
But where MYOB has to list interest-bearing debt to raise funds, Xero’s high and rising share price practically gives it access to free money. On October 14 it raised $180 million by issuing just a handful of new shares – which of course did not have any diluting effect (the new shares were bought at $18.15; a premium; the stock went into a trading halt at $17.95 before the announcement. Since then, Xero shares have been on a tear, peaking at $41.50 this week for a market cap above $5.3 billion before settling back to $35.21).
The new funds – which take its total cash to $230 million – give Xero time to succeed. And as Drury has told NBR, his company is currently “fighting with one hand behind our back” in the key US market. It won’t add payroll modules until the New Year.
Drury readily acknowledges Intuit has a tight grip on the US market. Various surveys give it between 80% and 90% of the small business market (an oft-quoted figure is that there are 29 million small businesses in the US, although Quicken hasn’t given any detailed figure on the number of companies that use its software; and of course many smaller companies and sole traders will simply be cobbling things together in Excel, or otherwise using no accounting software).
But when you focus on the high-growth area, the cloud, things look a little rosier Xero.
Intuit's  August 21, 2012 Nasdaq filing, for its financial year to July 31, released August 21, saw company report users of its cloud product, QuickBooks Online, had increased 28% to 487,000 (with 20,000 outside the US).
That means Xero – with an 89% annual increase to 211,300 customers (according to an October 3 NZX filing) – is well within cooee. And more so when you consider Xero’s number is all paying customers, while Intuit’s 487,000 includes an unspecified number on a free-trial period.
It’s important not to over-state Xero’s current position in the crucial North American market. According to its October 3 filing, under 16,600 of its customers are in the US (that’s the number listed under “US/Rest of World; of the three markets where specific customer numbers are given, NZ has  85,500, Australia 79,100 and the UK 30,100).
And Xero’s revenue figures also reflect that, so far, it has only a toehold in the US, Annualised monthly subscriber revenue at September 30, 2013 was $70.6 million, which was made up of New Zealand $23.9 million, Australia $30.2 million, UK $10.2 million, and US/rest-of-world $6.3 million.
As Xero builds on its sales and sales support staff in the US (it has 100 staff across San Francisco, LA, New York and Denver), it’s going to gain more traction.
Even before its first “XeroCon” conference in the US in October, 2000 US accountants have completed Xero training events, the company said at its AGM. The largest accounting firm in California (and the 29th largest in the US), Armanino, has signed on as a partner.
Xero has landed a five-star review in CPA Practice Advisor, and been talked up by influential tech blogger Rober Scoble (aka @Scobleizer), albeit in his day job at Rackspace, Xero's data centre host (hey, you've got work every  angle).
The company’s cash rich, it’s got a solid strategy, and its grafting hard. And arguably, the fact Intuit’s still making good from its legacy software will work in Xero’s favour. A complacent incumbent, tied by golden handcuffs, could be rich pickings.
Xero’s already a great NZ success story, and it’s hard not see it continuing to pile on customers and become profitable.
Can Xero win on the stock market?
I have no idea.
In June last year, as Xero’s market cap approached $500 million, NBR asked  Is Xero worth a cool half billion?.
Some people were using the word "bubble" by that point. I don't know what the word is to describe what's happening now, with Xero [NZX:XROpassing the $5 billion market cap milestone this week (before settling back a little).
Since that "half billion" article, as mentioned above, Xero has grown customers 89% to 211,300, and has seen an attendant growth in its annualised revenue to $70.6 million (the company says its 2014 loss will be wider than the prior year’s $14.4 million; as noted above it now has $230 million in cash, and a burn rate last quarter of $4.6 million a month).
But its share price has accelerated far beyond the point where you can apply any traditional valuation metric like price-to-sales or price-to-earnings.
As it topped $5 billion market cap this week, Xero became the NZX’s second most valuable company.
Investors can take heart that a sophisticated investor like Peter Thiel (PayPal cofounder, the first outside to put money into Facebook and an early backer of Yammer and LinkedIn) reupped his investment in Xero as his investment company participated in the October 14 $180 million capital raising round at $18.15 (although a penny for his thoughts as Xero hit $41.50 this week).
ABOVE: Xero one-year price history (NZX.com)
Clearly, investors are taking a punt on Xero’s potential.
And there's potential for Xero to grow organically - more so given that Thiel & co recently topped up its tank.
There’s potential for Xero to be bought.
Intuit and Sage (which came close to buying MYOB last time it as up for grabs in late 2011) are obvious candidates. There would be a lot finger-drumming on the boardroom table if loss-making Xero up for grabs at its present valuation. But another couple of years of doubling customer growth  - especially in the US – could shift thinking.
Intuit has already shown a modest appetite for acquisition picking up cloud-based personal finance outfit Mint.com for $US170 million.
Drury says Xero is not up for sale. But then again he sold his first two companies, and if the price is right, anything is for sale.
Of course, Intuit could also push back, and invest more in QuickBooks Online.
Scenarios from "US fail" to "US Blue Sky"
This week, First NZ Capital became the second major brokerage after Forsyth Barr, to initiate coverage on Xero.
First NZ research analyst James Schofield rates Xero a buy, with a 12-month target of $47.50 (ForBarr has a hold rating and a 12-month target of $20.30).
Both brokerages (and the smaller Woodward Partners) see US success as the key to justifying Xero’s heady valuation.
In its first research note, First NZ models Xero’s share price against seven possible customer scenarios, seven years in the future.
The worst-case FY20 scenario is “US fail”, which sees 1.6 million worldwide customers, valuing shares (close your eyes, those who bought in this week) at $13.50. First NZ sees a 10% chance of this scenario.
“US traction”, rated a 35% probability, sees 4.3 million customers in 2020, valuing shares at $43.48.
“US success”, rated a 20% probability, sees 5.6 million customers, valuing shares at $58.50.
And the go-go “US Blue Sky” scenario, rated a 10% probability sees 7 million customers, which First NZ ses valuing shares at $75.55.
(First NZ uses three different valuation methods, but all the results are quite close. I’ve quoted a selection of its DCF numbers.)
First profit seen in FY2017
First NZ sees Xero making increasing losses, culminating in a $49 million loss in FY 2016 (the year it anticipates Xero will hit 1 million customers.
It sees the first profit in FY2017, with Xero making $37 million profit as customer numbers pass 1.75 million, followed by $238 million profit in 2018 as customer numbers pass 2.6 million and revenue hits $1 billion.
Nasdaq listing seen as transformative
Mr Schofield tells NBR part of this week's huge Xero run-up was driven by an increasingly number of US and Asian investors coming onboard the NZX and ASX-listed Xero.
But like all analysts NBR has spoken to, he sees a Nasdaq listing as key component of future success. It will boost Xero's profile (and, yes, hype) as well as providing a direct line to the world's most active tech investors.
Drury earlier told NBR that Xero has taken advice about issues related to listing on the Nasdaq; it was told a US listing would make sense once his company hits $US100 million in annual revenue.
First NZ sees Xero hitting that mark in 2015.
Certainly, an ASX/NZX listing would start to bust at the seams is Xero does hit the "Blue Sky" scenario First NZ paints as a possibility.
Salesforce - the pioneer and poster boy for software-as-a-service software - today has 100,000+ customers (lower than Xero, but many are large corporate accounts) and lost $US270 millin on $US3 billion last year. Like Xero, it disrupted its industry. If Xero achieves simillar revenue and customer success, then it's not outlandish for it to garner a $10 billion market cap on the Nasdaq by the end of this decade (Salesforce has a $US33 billion market cap). But it's harder to imagine it hittiing that mark if still contained to ASX/NZX.
Those qualifiers in full
Drury has not commented on 2015 revenue, when Xero could make a profit, or whether it will list on the Nasdaq – beyond acknowledging that is one of the options on the table.
Despite First NZ’s $45.70 one-year target and generally bullish numbers, Mr Schofield – like his opposite number at ForBarr – emphasises that Xero is a speculative play. It suits sophisticated investors who acknowledge the risk along with the potential rewards, and the usual rules about a diversified portfolio apply.
“As with any tech company going global, risks are extreme. Xero faces able competitors, especially Intuit. Risks include: execution, competitive response, key man [Rod, look both ways before you cross!], security, and high market beta,” First NZ warns.
Even with First NZ prediction, does it warrant a $5 billion market cap?
$37 million profit after tax in 2017, that 4 years from now assuming no extra shares are issued = eps of 29cents a share = a yield of 0.71% or p/e of 141.
Which is stretching it, as Xero is likely to need more cash injection to sustain the revenue growth as it makes increasing greater losses. This will dilute yield further.
Going by 2018 numbers $238 million net profit after tax (NPAT) = $1.87 earnings per hare (EPS), a yield of 4.5%, assuming no further dilution in shares.
Hardly numbers that excite after eating up so much cash from investors...
Posted on 7:43 AM | Categories:

IRS Unveils Tax Rules for 2014 / Deduction, Credits and Exemptions Will Rise Slightly in January

Tom Herman for the Wall St Journal writes: It's official now. The Internal Revenue Service recently announced inflation adjustments in many tax provisions for the 2014 tax year. These changes, required by law, will affect returns for 2014, to be filed in 2015. Many taxpayers may find it useful for planning purposes to know about those changes now.
Here are a few:
The basic standard deduction will increase to $12,400 for married couples filing jointly from $12,200 for 2013. It will be $6,200 for singles and married people filing separately, up from $6,100 for this year.
Nearly two-thirds of all filers typically choose the standard deduction. But before you do so, check to see if you would be better off itemizing your deductions (such as charitable gifts and interest payments) on Schedule A of Form 1040. It's tempting to choose the standard deduction since it's simpler. But you may be able to cut your tax bill by itemizing.
The maximum amount of the "earned income tax credit," designed to help the working poor, will be $6,143 for joint filers with three or more qualifying children. That's up from $6,044 for 2013. To see if you're eligible, visit irs.gov.
The personal exemption amount will be $3,950, up from $3,900 for 2013. But the amount begins to phase out once your income exceeds a certain level. For 2014, the phaseout (often known as PEP, for personal-exemption phaseout) will begin with adjusted gross income of $254,200 for most singles, or $305,050 for married couples filing jointly. It typically will phase out completely at $376,700 for singles, or $427,550 for joint filers.
Many filers also face limits on itemized-deduction amounts. Limits for the 2014 tax year will begin with adjusted gross income of $254,200 for most singles, or $305,050 for joint filers. This provision often is known in tax circles as "Pease," after a former member of Congress.
There are many other changes, including estate-tax numbers. The estate tax exemption will increase to $5,340,000 next year from $5,250,000 this year. But the annual gift-tax exclusion will remain unchanged at $14,000.
Posted on 7:42 AM | Categories:

Can Severance Pay Be Taxed? / With Billions of Dollars at Stake, the Supreme Court Has Agreed to Address the Issue

Laura Saunders for the Wall St Journal writes: A year ago, we reported a disagreement between two federal appeals courts as to whether payroll taxes are due on severance payments made to laid-off workers. We predicted the issue could wind up before the U.S. Supreme Court.


Now it has. In October, the court said it would hear one of the cases, U.S. v. Quality Stores, which the Sixth Circuit decided in favor of taxpayers. Oral arguments are scheduled to begin Jan. 14.
A great deal of money is at stake. More than 2,400 claims have been filed requesting total refunds of more than $1 billion in Social Security and Medicare taxes, according to Internal Revenue Service data cited in the government's petition to the court.
One claim filed by a firm can cover hundreds or even thousands of former employees, and some are more than a decade old, says Marianna Dyson, an employee-benefits lawyer at Miller & Chevalier in Washington.
Ordinarily, employees and employers each owe a flat Social Security tax of 6.2% up to a cap ($113,700 in 2013), plus an unlimited Medicare tax of 1.45% on wages, for a total rate as high as 15.3%. Together these are known as FICA, or payroll, taxes. (In 2011 and 2012, there was a temporary two-percentage-point cut in the worker's portion of Social Security tax, and starting this year affluent workers owe an extra 0.9 percentage point of Medicare tax.)
Tax refunds for individuals also could be substantial. For an executive laid off early in 2009 who received $100,000 of severance, the total refund could come to about $15,000 plus interest, split equally between the worker and the firm, says Ruth Wimer, a partner at law firm McDermott Will & Emery in Washington.
How will the court rule? Experts say the outcome of tax cases often is hard to predict, in part because the justices accept very few of them.
"Severance is paid in lieu of further wages, so the government has a good argument in favor of the tax," says Michael Graetz, a tax-law scholar who teaches at Columbia University's law school. "On the other hand, the government has lost its last three tax cases in the Supreme Court."
The justices also could take into account the huge potential revenue loss, say other experts. Ms. Dyson notes that a tie vote is possible, as Justice Elena Kagan has recused herself from the case. If there is a tie, the decision would be affirmed for the Sixth Circuit (Tennessee, Kentucky, Ohio and Michigan) and the court might take up the issue again in another case, Ms. Dyson says.
Here's what experts say employers and employees affected by this issue need to know.
Employers should continue to withhold payroll taxes on affected pay until the decision comes down, even if the company is located within the Sixth Circuit.
Employers should file refund claims for the taxes. The filing needs to be made with the IRS within three years of the April due date following the calendar year of the severance payment.
So if a firm paid severance in 2010, it has until April 15, 2014, to file a refund claim. This will be after the court hears arguments on the issue but before there is likely to be a decision, Ms. Wimer notes.
In the past, firms that had refund claims denied by the IRS needed to file a suit in U.S. District Court or the U.S. Court of Federal Claims within two years to preserve the right to benefit from a favorable Supreme Court decision.
This summer, however, the IRS issued a statement saying that if the two-year deadline is approaching, it will sign an agreement to extend the deadline pending the court's decision on this issue. This could save firms the expense of filing a court challenge.
Laid-off workers should ask former employers if the firm is pursuing a payroll-tax refund. Some firms have alerted former workers that they are doing so, but they aren't required to notify them unless the IRS agrees to pay a claim.
At that point, the employer asks former workers for consent to include their claims with its own. This sets up a process so that the company can pay former workers their shares of refunded tax.
If the employer didn't file a refund claim but the former worker believes he is entitled to one, then often he can file IRS Form 843 to make a claim, says an IRS spokesman.
But the worker must make the claim within the statute of limitations, often three years after he files the return reporting the severance pay.
If taxpayers win the case and receive payroll-tax refunds, the money isn't taxable—but the interest is, Ms. Wimer says.
Posted on 7:42 AM | Categories: