Thursday, November 14, 2013

QuickBooks Software Integration : Big Changes

Charlie Russel for Sleeter Group writes: I firmly believe that an important feature of ANY accounting product is the ability to create an ecosystem of add-on products created by third-party developers. If an accounting product can’t let other companies expand its feature set, that product is severely limited. That is why I pay so much attention to the ways that you can integrate with products like QuickBooks (desktop and Online) and Xero. It’s a key point made by Greg Lam in his Cloud Accounting Comparison. It is also a major component of Doug Sleeter’s concept of Chunkification.


With that in mind, at the Sleeter Group Accounting Solutions Conference, Intuit announced several MAJOR changes in their policies for add-on product development for QuickBooks Desktop and QuickBooks Online. The two main points (from my perspective) are that Intuit is now saying:
  • If you develop products for QuickBooks Desktop, use the SDK. This is a 180 degree change from what they’ve been saying for several years now.
  • If you develop products for QuickBooks Online, they are dropping all developer fees. This is a significant move towards an “open API” to encourage developers to work with QuickBooks Online.
This is a major change in their approach to add-on products!
I have to say that I am truly surprised by this, these are things that I’ve been advocating for, along with many add-on developers, for years.
In addition to those major changes, Intuit also announced:
  • The release of the IPP/QuickBooks API V3, which allows developers access to a more consistent, easy to use and global-ready programming interface.
  • Intuit.Apps.com is now fully functional, taking over from the Intuit App Center, providing better app discovery features for consumers looking for add-on products
  • Intuit has a partnership with American Express that will provide a tighter integration between QuickBooks products and the American Express small business “Receipt Match” product.
Let’s review how add-on products work with QuickBooks, what this new policy means for developers, accounting professionals and product users. There are a lot of complicated details!

-SNIP-  The article Continues at Sleeter Group

Posted on 7:40 AM | Categories:

Xero’s New Plans: Businesses with Staff Pushed to Premium Plans [Comparison]

Sholto MacPhearson for BoxIT writes: 


Xero pricing comparison
  • Side-by-side comparisons of old and new pricing schemes in UK, US, NZ, AU
  • One plan jumped in price 460 percent
  • Companies with staff pay more
Xero’s announcement yesterday that it had revised pricing for its cloud accounting software sparked outrage on the company’s blog, as reported earlier.
At face value, the Small, Medium and Large plans seem to be cheaper as the rebadged Starter, Standard and Premium plans (the Standard is $1 more). But changes to the conditions will see Australian businesses with staff move up a plan.
Xero CEO Rod Drury claimed that 90 percent of its customers would pay less or only $1 more when the changes came into effect on December 9. (All prices include GST.)
Let’s look at the detail. How does Xero’s new pricing differ from the old in the Australian market?
Also below, a comparison between old and new pricing schemes in Australia, New Zealand, UK, US and Global.

The Winners

Two categories come out on top. Micro businesses with fewer than five clients, five major expenses and very limited bank transactions pay 13 percent less ($29 to $25) on the Small plan, now called Starter.
The conditions remain exactly the same for the smallest plan. Five invoices, five bills and 20 bank statement lines per month; one payroll employee and up to 1GB file storage for attachments to invoices, expenses, etc. (All plans have unlimited users.)
Despite the heavy restrictions, Xero’s Australian managing director Chris Ridd claims there are thousands of small businesses using it.
Businesses on the large plan with less than 10 employees also pay slightly less (6 percent). The $64 Large plan is now called a Premium plan which start at $60 and run up to $90.
The added features (automated superannuation payments and multi-currency) remain the same on the Premium plans but the restriction on the number of employees will see a large number of businesses paying more.

The Losers

The Large plan claimed it could service “hundreds of payroll employees” but a business with 100 employees will pay 40 percent more ($90 instead of $64 a month). Given that businesses with up to 20 employees could use the Medium plan on the old scheme, those that had no need for multi-currency or automated super payments would pay at least 25 percent more on the $80 Premium plan for 21-50 employees.
The biggest change happens in the middle. The Medium plan has been renamed as Standard and increased by $1. Features remain the same (auto super and multi-currency still don’t kick in until the bigger plans) but the number of payroll employees has been slashed from 20 to 1.
This means that any business with more than one employee will need to move to at least the $60 Premium plan – or even the $70 plan, if it had 11 or more employees.
This represents a jump of 21 percent to 42 percent in the amount businesses are paying for their accounting software.
Xero’s Ridd says there are “thousands” of Australian customers using the Medium edition to pay just one employee.
“Being cloud based we can see exactly the sorts of volumes of paid employees across the various plans. It may surprise you, but in Australia two-thirds of our customers across the board are either paying less or are only paying $1 more as a result of these changes,” Ridd wrote in a comment on the company blog.

A Fair Increase?

Xero’s Drury says price rises are reasonable and overdue – he claims the company hasn’t touched pricing since 2006 despite adding innovative features such as document file storage, direct uploading tax forms to the taxation department and development of its accounting practice software.
Xero includes support for free. This is a big difference to the desktop accounting software model where a user pays a one-off fee for the program and an ongoing monthly fee for phone and email support (eg. MYOB Cover).
Tens of thousands of Xero users will be affected by the new employee restriction to the Medium plan and will pay at least 20 percent more by moving to a Premium plan. But they may have ended up on the Premium plans anyway.
Legislative changes in Australia will make automatic superannuation payments compulsory in July next year. Under the old scheme, Xero users would have had to pay 30 percent more ($49 to $64) for the automatic super feature.
“Those with higher volumes of paid employees and hence larger businesses is where the bulk of the price increases have been and we feel that is fair trade for the value they receive,” Ridd wrote in the comments.

Global Comparison

Xero’s price changes have broken very unevenly around the world. Some countries the price changes moved a couple of dollars, while in others the price schemes leapt from three plans to six. In one market the top plan jumped a whopping 460 percent, effectively rebranding Xero as a tool suitable for medium businesses and away from its initial small or micro-business origins.

New Zealand

In Xero’s home country New Zealand, the pricing model was exactly the same, with a $4 price drop for the Small plan and $1 increases for the Medium and Large plans.
Xero prices in NZ – current pricing.
Xero NZ plan – current pricing. Click to enlarge.
Xero prices in NZ – new pricing.
Xero NZ plan – new pricing. Click to enlarge


United Kingdom

The UK had almost identical treatment to New Zealand. The three-plan model remained with a small fall at the bottom end (down by 3 pounds) and a one-pound rise for the middle and large plans.
Xero UK plan – current pricing. Click to enlarge.
Xero UK plan – current pricing. Click to enlarge.
UK plan – new pricing. Click to enlarge.
UK plan – new pricing. Click to enlarge.


Global

Likewise Xero Global remained identical in structure with a US$1 increase across the board.
Xero global plan - current pricing. Click to enlarge.
Xero global plan – current pricing. Click to enlarge.
Xero global plan – new pricing. Click to enlarge.
Xero global plan – new pricing. Click to enlarge.


Australia

Australia faced the greatest upheaval, with a doubling of the number of plans from three to six (as outlined above), more plans than any other market. The median price rose by $16 to $65 – an increase of 33 percent.
Xero Australia plan – current pricing. Click to enlarge.
Xero Australia plan – current pricing. Click to enlarge.
Xero Australia plan – new pricing. Click to enlarge.
Xero Australia plan – new pricing. Click to enlarge.


US

The US plans recorded the biggest price rises. The revised pricing scheme followed the Australian model but offered three premium plans instead of four. The greatest difference was recorded by businesses with 100 employees. Instead of paying US$39 a month they now pay US$180 a month – a 460 percent increase.
The same Premium 100 plan in Australia cost half that ($90 vs US$180). However, the US Premium plans included Payroll direct deposit, eFile and ePay Taxes features that were unavailable in Australia.
Xero US plan – current pricing. Click to enlarge.
Xero US plan – current pricing. Click to enlarge.
Xero US plan – new pricing. Click to enlarge.
Xero US plan – new pricing. Click to enlarge.

Posted on 7:22 AM | Categories:

Online accounting firm FreeAgent tops Deloitte growth list / FreeAgent among top ten on 2013 Deloitte Fast 50

BBC writes: An online accounting software firm has been named the fastest-growing technology firm in Scotland in a report by accountants Deloitte.
FreeAgent was placed eighth overall in the UK in Deloitte's Fast 50 listing for 2013.
FreeAgent reported a 2,128% rise in turnover between 2007 and 2012 to secure its place on the annual list of the 50 fastest-growing tech firms.
The Edinburgh-based company started with just three staff.
It has since grown into a business with more than 34,000 customers worldwide, and now employs more than 50 people.
FreeAgent is an online bookkeeping and accounting system targeted at freelancers and small businesses.
Chief executive and founder Ed Molyneux said: "The past few years have been an incredible journey for FreeAgent.
"When we first started out in 2007, there was just me and my two co-founders involved with running the business.
"Since then, we've been able to build our business successfully to the point where we now have people in more than 80 countries worldwide using FreeAgent."
-

FreeAgent among top ten on 2013 Deloitte Fast 50

 CIOL Bureau writes: FreeAgent, the UK's market-leader in online accounting, has been named among 2013's fastest growing technology firms.
The company - which provides an award-winning online accounting system for small businesses and freelancers - featured in 8th place on this year's prestigious Deloitte Fast 50 list in recognition of its impressive growth over the past five years.
FreeAgent reported a 2128 pc rise in turnover in the period 2007-2012 to earn its place on the Fast 50 - the annual list that Deloitte publishes of the 50 fastest growing technology companies across the whole of the UK. During the same period, FreeAgent has also grown from a fledgling three-man operation into a thriving business with more than 34,000 customers worldwide and which employs more than 50 people in its Edinburgh HQ and remotely throughout the rest of the country.
Ed Molyneux, CEO and co-founder of FreeAgent, said: "The past few years have been an incredible journey for FreeAgent. When we first started out in 2007, there was just me and my two co-founders involved with running the business. We were former freelancers armed with a vision of providing an intuitive accounting system that would help put sole traders and small business owners back in control of their finances.
Posted on 7:22 AM | Categories:

Xero Price Rise Sparks Backlash from Users and Partners

Sholto MacPhearson for Box IT out of Australia writes:

Xero price rises



  • Most popular plan for businesses with staff increased by $11 
  • Price changes to come into effect 9 December
  • Silver and higher Xero partners not affected until July 2014
CORRECTION: The minimum number of clients for Xero Silver partner is 25, not 50 as previously stated.
In a pricing revision announced yesterday, Xero reduced the number of employees on its most popular plan from a limit of 20 to a single employee. A stream of angry comments by disgruntled users and Xero partners erupted on the company’s blog which revealed the changes. (For details, read a side-by-side comparison of old and new prices.)
“Cost was a big issue for (our clients) but they wore it on our recommendation. As the Xero champion, I feel betrayed,” wrote a commenter, Matthew. “Guys, you’ve got a good product but your decision on this one makes you look like every software vendor that Xero users have been trying to get away from.”
“Sorry Rod, but 90 percent of my clients are now going to be paying $11/month more. They are currently on medium plans and have < 10 employees. They have no need for multi currency or auto super. To now limit this plan to one employee is absurd!!” wrote Cassandra Scott, a prominent Xero bookkeeping partner.
Xero CEO Rod Drury responded in the comments on the company blog that the change in pricing would only raise prices for 10 percent of its customers and that the company hadn’t raised prices for seven years despite adding many innovative features.
Users’ outrage focused on the short notice Xero gave – the price change will come into effect within four weeks on 9 December – and a new restriction for the most popular plan which pushed businesses with more than one employee onto premium plans costing $60 to $90 per month.
Xero’s medium plan under the existing scheme cost $49 a month in Australia and covered many businesses because it gave users the ability to generate hundreds of invoices and transactions and could be used with up to 20 employees.
The plan, renamed as “Standard” under the new scheme, cost $50, and could only service a single employee.
Several users said they thought the price rise was justified but were disappointed at the way it had been announced.
“We will pass this cost onto our clients and most (if not all) won’t mind but many will want certainty this won’t happen again. We are gold partners but we cannot give any certainty to our clients about the cost of xero now. The trust is gone. Not good,” wrote a commenter, Mark.
Xero management pointed to the number of updates to the accounting program which could improve the productivity of a business in managing their finances. In particular, the auto-superannuation included on the premium plans generated enormous time savings and reduced errors, said Xero supporters. The extra $132 a year was easily justified, they said.
Prices were based around the number of employees on payroll and the auto super function, Chris Ridd wrote in a response to comments. Auto super would become compulsory in taxation reforms in Australia next year which was why Xero had decided to include it in its premium plans. “Other vendors in the market charge anywhere from $1 per employee per month (for auto super). When you factor this into the pricing based on comparative offerings, these pricing plans should be easier to justify,” Ridd said.
A minority of respondents welcomed the price rise and condemned the “overreaction” of other posters.
“I would think for most entities the increase will be from $49 to $60 per month. So that’s $132 per year. That represents maybe two or three hours of bookkeeping time in Australia? Or a tank and a half of fuel? A lot of you are forgetting the value (of the software),” wrote Peter Morgan.
Xero offered to fix current prices for Silver, Gold and Platinum partners until July 2014 when accountants reissue work agreements with their clients. But Bronze partners who hadn’t met the 25-client minimum for Silver status had to pass on the cost to clients from December or pay the price rise themselves. (Gold status is 100 clients.)
“The offer to silver and above does nothing to assist or incentivise the many many partners who are in the early part of their Xero journey,” wrote a commenter, Sam. “I, like many others at the encouragement of Xero, have based my model around benefit of fixed fee service to convince many clients to change to Xero from their existing software.
“This forces all the pain on the very advocates working hard to promote and grow your product, seemingly at our cost and reputation. Very uncool way to treat the very people who are doing most of the ‘heavy lifting’. Not happy Jan.”
Xero had spent months planning the price changes and had to draw the line in offering price protection, Ridd replied.
“I believe we have made efforts to acknowledge the hard work and advocacy that is present within our partner channel. I’d also add that very few vendors give advanced warning when making pricing increases,” Ridd said. “Nor is it an industry norm to offer price protection for a period of time.”
Posted on 7:22 AM | Categories:

More on Net Investment Income Tax

Kenneth Peterson for the Monterey Herald writes: Q: In last week's column you listed some new income taxes that will hit higher income taxpayers especially hard starting this year. One of those taxes is an additional 3.8 percent surtax on investment income. Most of my income comes from investments, including rental income, dividends, and capital gains. How do I know if I will have to pay the new tax?


A: The tax you are referring to is the Net Investment Income Tax, or NIIT. This new federal tax went into effect on Jan. 1, 2013, but most taxpayers won't feel its impact until they file their tax returns next Spring. The NIIT is a 3.8 percent surtax on certain net investment income of individuals, estates, and trusts with income over income limits mandated by Congress. Special rules apply to income from Charitable Remainder Trusts.
For married individuals like yourself, the tax applies if you have NIIT and if your modified adjusted gross income exceeds $250,000. For single filers, the threshold is $200,000. Estates and trusts are subject to the NIIT if they have undistributed net investment income and are in the highest tax bracket, which is 39.6 percent and kicks in when the entity's adjusted gross income exceeds $11,950 in 2013.
Q: What investment income is subject to this new tax?
A: The NIIT applies to income from interest, dividends, capital gains, rental and royalty income, non-qualified annuities, income from businesses involved in trading of financial instruments or commodities, and businesses that are passive activities to you.
Q: What kinds of gains are covered by NIIT?
A: The surtax applies to gains from the sale of stocks, bonds, mutual funds and capital gains distributions from mutual funds. You will also pay the surtax on the gains from the sale of real estate and gains from the sale of interests in partnerships and S Corporations if you were a passive owner.
Q: Does NIIT apply to the sale of my personal residence?
A: Yes, it applies to the amount that you would have to pay tax on after you subtract any excluded amount of gain you may be eligible for. The exclusion amounts for eligible homeowners are $500,000 if you are filing your tax return as married filing jointly, and $250,000 if you are filing as single.
Q: Can I deduct my investment expenses?
A: Yes, the surtax applies to the net investment income, which is your gross investment income less any related expenses. Such expenses include investment interest expense, investment advisory and brokerage fees, expenses related to rental and royalty income, and state and local income taxes properly allocable to items included in Net Investment Income.
Q: What types of income are not subject to NIIT?
A: Wages, unemployment compensation, income from operating a non-passive business, Social Security benefits, alimony, tax-exempt interest such as most municipal bond interest, self-employment income, and distributions from most retirement plans are not subject to NIIT.
Q: How do I report and pay the NIIT?
A: You must report your net investment income on your IRS Form 1040 annual income tax return and pay the tax along with your other taxes. The IRS has developed a new form, Form 8960, for you to use to report your NIIT with your Form 1040.
Posted on 7:21 AM | Categories:

Don't Forget the Tax Breaks for SUVs, Trucks and Vans

ROBIN CHRISTIAN for CPA PRactice Advisor writes:  New and used vehicles that fall outside the passenger auto definition also qualify for the Section 179 deduction (generally a total of $500,000 for all eligible property placed in service in tax years beginning in 2013). As explained later, however, heavy...


As you know, skimpy federal income tax depreciation allowances generally apply to passenger autos used for business (IRC Sec. 280F). These are the so-called luxury auto depreciation limitations. Specifically, for passenger autos placed in service in 2013, the maximum depreciation deductions (including the Section 179 deduction) are as follows:
Of course, when a passenger auto is used less than 100% for business, these figures are cut back even further. In fact, the average client may not live long enough to fully depreciate a really expensive car.
Better Depreciation Rules or Vehicles Falling outside Passenger Auto Definition
Fortunately, the luxury auto depreciation limitations only apply to passenger autos [IRC Sec. 280F(a)(1)(A)]. When the vehicle in question is used over 50% for business and is not classified as a passenger auto, it can be depreciated without limit under the MACRS rules for transportation equipment, which is considered to be five-year property. In addition, new vehicles that are outside the passenger auto definition also qualify without limits for 50% first-year bonus depreciation if acquired and placed in service during calendar-year 2013 [IRC Sec. 168(k)].
Finally, new and used vehicles that fall outside the passenger auto definition also qualify for the Section 179 deduction (generally a total of $500,000 for all eligible property placed in service in tax years beginning in 2013). As explained later, however, heavy SUVs are subject to a reduced Section 179 limit of $25,000 per vehicle.
Unless Congress takes action, bonus depreciation won't be available after 2013. Furthermore, the Section 179 deduction limit will drop to a $25,000 combined total for all eligible property acquired and placed in service during tax years beginning after 2013-not just for heavy SUVs. So, a business that is on the fence about buying a vehicle that isn't a passenger auto this year or next may want to get it done sooner rather than later. Of course, it is possible that Congress will extend the increased Section 179 deduction and bonus depreciation beyond 2013, but why take the chance?
Clearly, the tax-saving trick is buying something outside the passenger auto definition. Because a car is a passenger auto unless its unloaded weight exceeds 6,000 pounds, few cars, if any, escape passenger auto status. However, a truck, van, or SUV escapes passenger auto status if its Gross Vehicle Weight Rating (GVWR-the manufacturer's maximum weight rating when loaded to capacity) exceeds 6,000 pounds. [See IRC Sec. 280F(d)(5)(A).] In making this determination, the weight rating and the manufacturer's classification as a car, truck, or van are the controlling factors, not the type of chassis. (See CCA 201138046 .)
These "heavy" vehicles are eligible for the favorable depreciation rules outlined earlier (as opposed to the stingy luxury auto rules that apply to passenger autos). As you'll see, quite a few SUVs, pickups, and vans qualify as heavy.
Reduced Section 179 Deduction for Heavy SUVs
There is a $25,000 per vehicle limit on Section 179 deductions for any heavy SUV with a GVWR over 6,000 pounds and less than 14,001 pounds [IRC Sec. 179(b)(5) ]. For this purpose, the term heavy SUVincludes trucks and vans, as well as what is normally thought of as an SUV. Exception: the reduced deduction rule doesn't apply to:
(1.) Vehicles designed to seat more than nine passengers behind the driver's seat. For example, many hotel shuttle vans will qualify for this exception.
(2.) Vehicles equipped with a cargo area that is not readily accessible directly from the passenger compartment and that is at least six feet in interior length. The cargo area can be open or designed to be open, but enclosed by a cap. For example, many pickups with full-size cargo beds will qualify for this exception. Some "quad cabs" and "extended cabs" with shorter cargo beds may not.
(3.) Vehicles with: (a) an integral enclosure that fully encloses the driver's compartment and load carrying device, (b) no seating behind the driver's seat, and (c) no body section protruding more than 30 inches ahead of the leading edge of the windshield. For example, many delivery vans will qualify for this exception.

Vehicles with GVWRs above 6,000 pounds that fall under these exceptions remain eligible for the full Section 179 deduction ($500,000 all eligible property placed in service in tax years beginning in 2013). This means the business portion of the cost of these vehicles (both new and used) can often be completely deducted in Year One under Section 179.
Depreciation Rules for Heavy SUVs Are Still Quite Good
The idea of buying a heavy SUV is still a smart year-end tax planning strategy for 2013. Why? Because a heavy SUV used over 50% for business can qualify for the following depreciation benefits:
(1.) The $25,000 heavy SUV Section 179 deduction (available for both new and used vehicles). This is a per vehicle limit. Thus, a client could feasibly place 20 heavy SUVs costing more than $25,000 in service during 2013 and qualify for a total Section 179 deduction of $500,000 ($25,000 per vehicle, limited to $500,000).
(2.) The 50% first-year bonus depreciation break (available for new vehicles acquired and placed in service in calendar-year 2013).
(3.) Accelerated MACRS depreciation over five years for the balance of the vehicle's depreciable basis (available for both new and used vehicles).
In contrast, passenger autos fall under the less-favorable luxury auto depreciation limitations discussed earlier.
Example:  The first-year depreciation amount for a new $65,000 heavy SUV placed in service during 2013 and used 100% for business will usually be $49,000 [$25,000 Section 179 deduction + $20,000 bonus depreciation deduction (50% x $40,000) + $4,000 MACRS depreciation deduction (20% x $20,000)]. In contrast, the maximum first-year depreciation deduction for a new $65,000 passenger auto placed in service during 2013 and used 100% for business is only $11,160 (or $11,360 for a light truck or van).
Variation 1:  If the heavy SUV was not new, but instead was a used vehicle, 50% bonus depreciation would not be available. However, the business's 2013 depreciation deduction would still be a respectable $33,000 [$25,000 Section 179 deduction + $8,000 MACRS depreciation deduction (20% x $40,000)]. That's still a far cry from the stingy $3,160 ($3,360 for a light truck or van) deduction allowed for a used passenger auto placed in service during 2013 and used 100% for business.
Variation 2:  If, instead of the heavy SUV, the business placed in service a $65,000 heavy pickup truck with a six-foot cargo bed, the entire $65,000 would a be fully deductible under Section 179.
Variation 3:  If the business waits until 2014 to acquire the heavy pickup truck in Variation 2, its first year deduction will be only $33,000 [$25,000 Section 179 deduction + $8,000 MACRS depreciation deduction (20% x $40,000)] (assuming no other Section 179 deduction was claimed for the year). Not too bad, but a far cry from the $65,000 deduction available if the truck had been placed in service in 2013.
Caveats to Remember and Discuss with Clients
Clients should understand the following caveats:
  • Vehicles (including heavy SUVs, pickups, and vans) are generally listed property [IRC Section 280F(d)(4)]. As such, they are subject to the business-use substantiation rules that apply to listed property.
  • The Section 179 deduction is unavailable for that part of the cost of a vehicle paid for with a trade-in transaction that's treated as Section 1031 like-kind exchange [IRC Sec. 179(d)(3) and Reg. 1.179-4(d)]. [That part is, however, eligible for bonus depreciation. See Reg. 1.168(k)-1(f)(5)(iii) .]
  • The Section 179 deduction is limited to the taxpayer's net trade or business income for the year, with any excess generally carried over to the following year.
    • If business use falls to 50% or less, excess depreciation must be recaptured. Excess depreciation is the excess of Section 179 and other depreciation deductions (including bonus depreciation) allowed in years that the vehicle's business use exceeded 50% over the depreciation that would have been allowed in those years using straight line depreciation over a five-year recovery period.
    • Deductions allowable for state income tax purposes may be different from those allowed for federal tax purposes.
    • If a client's closely held corporation will be the owner of the vehicle, personal use by the shareholder-employee must be reported as taxable compensation income. Also, if the shareholder-employee owns over 5% of the stock, such compensatory use does not count as business use for purposes of the more-than-50% business-use requirement for listed property to qualify for accelerated MACRS depreciation, first-year bonus depreciation, and the Section 179 deduction.
Posted on 7:21 AM | Categories: