Friday, January 10, 2014

Retirement Plan Deductions, Contributions: 2014 Caps

INVESTOR'S BUSINESS DAILY WRITES: Congress giveth, Congress taketh away. Many of the ceilings on contributions and deductions for a variety of retirement and health savings accounts changed this year.

Some are up, others stayed put or disappeared — so far, anyway, in the case of the popular charitable individual retirement account rollover. "You can't plan without knowing what changed and what didn't," said CCH tax expert Mark Luscombe. Here are key new rules:

 401(k) contribution limit. The maximum that you can kick in stays the same this year: $17,500. If you are age 50 or older, the catch-up contribution ceiling is also unchanged at $5,500.

Only 11% of members of 401(k) plans run by Vanguard Group in 2012 contributed the basic maximum. You can beef up your nest egg a lot just by boosting the amount you pony up each year.

 IRA contribution limit. Here too the maximum stays the same: $5,500. Ditto for the $1,000 catch-up contribution max.
 Eligibility for IRA deduction. This concerns eligibility to deduct your contribution, not eligibility to make a contribution.
The tax deduction phases out for savers who have a workplace retirement plan like a 401(k) or whose spouse does, depending on the saver's modified adjusted gross income. For a single taxpayer or head of household, the phaseout starts once your MAGI hits $60,000. Eligibility ends totally at MAGI at $70,000. Last year's phaseout range was $59,000 to $69,000.

For marrieds filing jointly, when the account owner is covered by a workplace plan, the new phaseout range is $96,000 to $116,000. That's $1,000 higher on both ends of the range.

If the nonaccount-owner spouse is covered by a workplace plan, the phaseout range is $181,000 to $191,000, up $3,000 on each end.

For a single filer who does not have a workplace plan, your IRA contribution is deductible no matter what your MAGI is.
Even with little or no deduction, try to contribute. Ed Slott, editor of the IRA Advisor newsletter, said, "You get something like a Roth IRA. No deduction, but tax-free withdrawals."

 Roth IRA eligibility. Eligibility to contribute to a Roth IRA phases out with adjusted gross income of $114,000 to $129,000 for singles and heads of household. That's up $2,000 vs. 2013. The phaseout range is $181,000 to $191,000 for marrieds filing jointly, up $3,000.

If your income is too high, you can make a nondeductible contribution to a traditional IRA and convert to a Roth.

Posted on 6:08 PM | Categories:

IRS free electronic tax filing program coming Jan. 17 / Free File's income eligibility limit has been increased to $58,000 -- $1,000 more than last year.

Kay Bell for Bankrate/MSN writes: Taxpayers who want to take advantage of the Internal Revenue Service's free tax preparation e-filing program won't have to wait. The Free File program opens to taxpayers on Jan. 17, two weeks before the IRS starts processing 2013 tax returns.

The IRS will not start processing any tax returns until Jan. 31. The government shutdown in October 2013 slowed IRS updates of forms and tests of its computer systems, leading officials to push the official opening of this year's filing season to the end of the month.

But that doesn't mean taxpayers have to sit around. Free File companies will hold taxpayers' completed tax returns and then submit them on Jan. 31. 

The early opening of Free File is good news for millions of eligible taxpayers. They are among the group of electronic filers, which increases every year, primarily because they can get their refunds more quickly. 

And for the 2014 filing season, a few more taxpayers should be able to use the Free File option. The income eligibility limit has been increased to $58,000. That's $1,000 more than last year. 

Free File 2014 basics

  • You can file your 2013 tax return through Free File if your adjusted gross income is $58,000 or less.
  • The income cutoff applies regardless of your filing status.
  • Free File is for individual, not business, tax returns. However, a sole proprietor who files Schedule C with Form 1040 can use Free File.
  • Some participating Free File vendors also offer free state tax return preparation and e-file.
  • Some Free File companies offer free electronic extensions. But remember, you still must pay any taxes due by the April 15 deadline or you'll be charged interest and possibly penalties on any tax you owe.
  • You do not download anything. All of the software, which is encrypted to protect privacy, remains at the Free File company website you select, and your return is filed from there.
  • Access Free File by going to IRS.gov and clicking on the Free File icon. Beware of offers by outside websites to take you to the Free File website, as they could be scams operated by identity thieves.
Posted on 3:32 PM | Categories:

One API For Box, Dropbox, Google Drive, Sky Drive, and SharePoint

 Cloud Integration Platform-as-a-Service company Cloud Elements has announced Documents Hub, a "one-to-many" integration platform service. This developer tool provides a single API to integrate Box, Dropbox, Google Drive, Sky Drive, and Microsoft SharePoint — all through a uniform set of REST API calls.

The suggestion here is that developers can now connect to an entire category of services such as documents, CRM, marketing and accounting, etc. There is a single console to provision, integrate, monitor, and maintain these services. Additional document and file services will regularly be added to the Documents Hub, including support early next year for Amazon S3 and Rackspace Files.

The firm says that to date, developers of SaaS applications have had to write a custom, one-off integration to each document service, which obviously takes up development time to integrate them all. The Cloud Elements Documents Hub allows developers to provision and integrate services within their specific environments.

The Cloud Elements singular dashboard offers automated monitoring and innovative tagging for account tracking and interoperability between services (e.g., attach, store, and send documents and files).

The Cloud Elements Documents Hub is free for developers to integrate into their applications and use in support of up to five customers. Developers can access the service using their GitHub account. Subscription plans begin at $99 per month.
Posted on 3:27 PM | Categories:

4 tax prep reminders for independent advisors

 GLORIA SCHULTZ for LifeHealthPro.com writes: As an independent contractor, you can claim tax benefits specific to self-employment while filing your returns. Organizing records and paying estimated taxes, for example, can help you avoid overwhelming stress or an exorbitant tax liability and penalties. The following guidelines help independent insurance agents understand tax advantages and how to properly prep for tax season.
First, confirm your independent contractor status with the IRS. The IRS defines independent contracting as when a business controls or directs the work results performed by a contract employee, and the employee manages how the results are accomplished. Ensure that your contractor status follows IRS regulations by filing the SS-8 form. Determining your status helps avoid liabilities and tax penalties.
Bookkeeping
Tax deductions relate to the cost of your work, which is why proof of expenses and thorough bookkeeping is essential. The goal of bookkeeping should be to prepare detailed reports that support your tax return. Use Mint or Quicken for automated and simple bookkeeping, suggests Career Builder. Developing a filing system for categorizing and tracking receipts can save a lot of time. Receipts will back up claimed deductions. Traveling expenses and business-related mileage count, too. Going to the bank to deposit a client's check or making hotel reservations for work-related traveling can qualify for tax deductions.
Quarterly taxes
Will your tax liability be more than $1,000 during the year? If so, pay taxes quarterly, which is in April, June, September and January. Create a tax savings account and automatically make savings deposits with each paycheck. Tax preparation software can also help you track estimated tax payments. TurboTax tracks estimated tax payments, prepares tax forms and provides e-filing. Quicken automatically calculates deductions and controls your finances by estimating tax payments. Intuit payroll tax specifically "withholds the correct payroll taxes from each paycheck," describes Intuit. You can rely on Intuit Online Payroll for paying and reporting payroll taxes, as well as completing payroll tax forms. Money-management software can also manage separate business and personal accounts, which optimizes the organization of your overall expenditures.
Tax write-offs
Individual retirement plans, property (such as your home) used for business purposes and indirect or direct work-related expenses can qualify as tax write-offs. Set up an individual 401(k) to make contributions as a 401(k) deferral, plus a certain percentage of net income. John L. Hillis, president of Hillis Financial Services, asserts retirement plans as the absolute No. 1 tax deduction, especially because "the government is helping fund retirement," according to TurboTax's Tax Tips.
Along with retirement, housing costs and direct work-related expenses can be deducted, including costs of Internet, phone services, postage and supplies. Even utilities, an indirect expense, can be incurred as an essential part to perform your job. You are a home-based contractor eligible for home-office deductions if you primarily work at home and designate an exclusive space for insurance business. Health care insurance costs, auto expenses (such as registration, insurance and maintenance) and professional service fees are also possible deductions.
Lastly, keep in mind the following tax tips:
  • Carefully review 1099s to ensure payments submitted to the IRS from clients actually match what you were paid;
  • Net expenses in detail using Schedule C;
  • Pay self-employment taxes, including Social Security and Medicare, on Schedule SE; file for a deductible using Form 1040.
Posted on 2:53 PM | Categories:

Starve The IRS Beast, Punish The Average Taxpayer

Janet Novack for Forbes writes: Some folks cheer when the Internal Revenue Service’s budget shrinks.  Last summer, for example, a House subcommittee approved a 24% IRS budget cut,  in part as punishment for the agency’s ham-handed handling of tax-exempt applications from Tea Party groups.
But before you join the starve-the-IRS-beast cause, keep this in mind:  while recent budget cuts may have chipped away at the IRS’  collection and enforcement activities, they’ve also hastened a dramatic decline in taxpayer service.

On Wednesday, the IRS released annual tablesshowing it audited just 0.96% of individual tax returns in fiscal 2013 ended Sept. 30, the lowest since 2005, and that the audit rate for those earning $1 million plus, (a particular focus in recent years), fell from 12.48% in 2011 to 10.85% in 2013. Buried on the last of nine pages of numbers was the change most likely to affect the average law-abiding Jane Taxpayer: just 60.5% of taxpayers who called the IRS’ toll-free assistance line got through to a human being last year, down from 74% in 2010 and 87% in 2004.
In her 2013 Annual Report to Congress released today, National Taxpayer Advocate Nina E. Olson offered additional indicators of collapsing service and named IRS budget cuts the second biggest problem facing taxpayers, both because of substandard service and because, she contends (and studies she has commissioned seem to support), rotten service may lead to more tax noncompliance. That, in turn, shifts more of the burden of paying for government to the still honest folks. (Olson’s pick for the biggest problem of 2013 is the IRS’ failure to set out a clear Taxpayer Bill of Rights and use it as a guide for evaluation of its operations and initiatives.)
Among the gruesome service details in Olson’s report: those callers who did manage to get through to a person at the IRS in 2013 first had to wait on hold an average of 17.6 minutes, up from 10.8 minutes in 2010 and 2.6 minutes in 2004.
Just as bad has been the deterioration in the IRS’ handling of the millions of pieces of correspondence it receives each year. This is a crucial function because the IRS conducts 76% of all individual audits by mail and sends out millions of additional computer generated notices a year telling taxpayers that they appear to have made some mathematical mistake or missed some bit of income reported on a 1099 or W-2. It also conducts most collection activity by mail.  When taxpayers respond to these scary IRS missives, say with documents showing they really made the charitable contributions they claimed, or that those big bogus refunds went to identity thieves, not to them, the IRS aims to deal with their responses within what it considers a  reasonable period (usually 45 days) and brands correspondence “over-age” when it hasn’t met that deadline.   At the end of 2013, the IRS had an inventory of 1.1 million letters, 53% of them over-age, up from 606,029 letters, 28% of them over-age, at the end of fiscal 2010.
And get this: the 1.1 million backlog was before  October’s 16-day federal shutdown, during which the agency received 400,000 additional pieces of correspondence, putting the IRS and taxpayers with IRS problems even further behind the eight-ball.
The 2010 budget represented a recent high water funding mark for the IRS, as the Obama Administration and a then Democratic-controlled Congress boosted its appropriations to $12.1 billion.  By 2013, including the effects of across-the-board “sequestration” cuts, its budget was 8% lower— down even more  when 6% inflation during that period and the IRS’ growing workload (including more tax returns filed and the implementation of ObamaCare) are considered. A workforce of 94,618 in 2010 had declined to  87,032 by 2013.
Particularly startling, the dollars spent on employee training dropped nearly 90%—from $172 million in 2010 to just $22 million in 2013. Sure, ridicule IRS training videos featuring Star Trek parodies and line dancing all you want. They display, to borrow Chris Christie’s Bridgegate description, “abject stupidity.” But a lack of training when the tax code is complex and constantly changing,  and taxpayers’ finances and even livelihoods are at stake, is plain crazy. Do you really want a poorly trained IRS auditor assessing tax you don’t owe or a know-nothing collector slapping an inappropriate levy on your bank account, mucking up the operation of your business or  your next mortgage payment? We give these people power,  the least we can do is train them to use it properly.
Poorly trained IRS workers may also provide more wrong answers about the tax law to citizens, although that’s admittedly a shrinking danger since the IRS is sharply curbing such answers, right or wrong. In December the IRS issued anotice to tax pros that in 2014 its phone representatives and the employees at hundreds of walk-in Taxpayer Assistance Centers (TACs) will no longer answer “complex” tax law questions, only “basic” ones,  and that the TACs will provide no tax advice at all after April 15th. “It is a sad state of affairs when the government writes tax laws as complex as ours and then is unable to answer any questions beyond ‘basic’ ones from baffled citizens who are doing their best to comply,’’ Olson said in a statement.
The IRS has also decided that TAC workers will no longer prepare tax returns, a service it had offered to low-income, elderly and disabled taxpayers. Instead, it will send everyone to volunteer tax preparers. Last year, TAC workers completed returns for 125,000 taxpayers during filing season, down from 223,000 in 2010.  The IRS rationale for curtailing tax advice and eliminating return prep is that with the spread of tax software and Web-based information it’s a logical place to cut in this era of shrinking budgets.
True,  www.irs.gov got 456 million visitors last year, up from 305 million in 2010. And Intuit INTU -0.52% Inc. whose TurboTax software dominates the market, offers free on-line service to taxpayers with simple returns, regardless of their income. Bob Meighan, vice president of TurboTax, estimates 90 million taxpayers qualify for the company’s free federal filing, although anyone with a Schedule C or C-EZ (Profit or Loss From Business) or Schedule D (Capital Gains and Losses), won’t qualify for either Intuit’s free service or one offered online by H&R Block HRB +0.87%.   TaxAct, a unit of Blucora BCOR +1.17%  (formerly InfoSpace), offers free federal filing for almost all forms, but it’s not as convenient as the product you must pay for.  Never mind that the old, poor and disabled folks who used to walk into an IRS office and ask for help completing their tax returns aren’t necessarily comfortable or proficient filling in forms on-line.
Posted on 2:44 PM | Categories:

New Rules Address Reporting Obligations of US Shareholders in Foreign Funds and Certain Other Foreign Corporations

John L. Harrington, Marc D. Teitelbaum, Jeffrey H. Koppele and Andrea Sharetta for Dentons writes: On December 30, 2013, the US Treasury Department (the "IRS") published a package of proposed, temporary, and final regulations relating to Passive Foreign Investment Companies ("PFICs") and their shareholders. The most significant component of the package is its guidance on the new annual filing requirements for PFIC shareholders, but the package also includes other, generally minor, changes to existing rules governing PFICs and their shareholders.

The IRS issued the regulations just in time to meet a self-imposed year-end deadline: the IRS wanted the new reporting rules to become effective before 2013 ended so that the new reporting rules would apply during the next filing season. Still, the package includes good news for some PFIC shareholders since the new regulations eliminate a retroactive filing requirement for 2011 and 2012 taxable years that had been threatened in a 2011 IRS notice.
The new regulations address in a limited way a package of technical PFIC regulations originally proposed by the IRS in 1992. Because the new package includes, in a modified form, a small portion of the 1992 proposed regulations, the new package withdraws that portion of the 1992 proposed regulations. The remaining (and outstanding) portion of the 1992 proposed regulations includes provisions that have been severely criticized. So, US investors and tax practitioners must await further IRS action to clarify the status of those proposed provisions and the interpretation of the applicable statutory rules.

PFICs Generally

A non-US corporation is generally a PFIC if:
  1. 75% or more of its gross income for the taxable year is passive income or
  2. the average percentage of assets it holds during the taxable year which produce passive income or which are held for the production of passive income is at least 50 percent.
Special US federal income tax and reporting rules apply to US investors that are considered to hold shares in a foreign company that produces sufficient passive income or holds sufficient passive assets to meet the definition of a PFIC, even if the foreign company met the definition for only one year during the investor's holding period. The rules applicable to PFIC shareholders are detailed and complicated. For example, three different sets of rules, or regimes, apply to US shareholders in a PFIC: a basic (or default) regime that subjects "excess distributions" from a PFIC to additional US income taxes on the income considered to be deferred or one of two alternative elective regimes (the "Qualified Electing Fund" and "mark-to-market" regimes) for shareholders in PFICs that qualify for those elective regimes. Stated simply, the goal of the PFIC rules is to deny the potential deferral of US tax that might otherwise be available to a US person that invests in a foreign investment fund that accumulates income. The PFIC rules effectively force US shareholders in a PFIC, no matter how small their interests may be, to recognize income earned by the PFIC currently (whether that income is distributed to the shareholder or not) or else pay US tax at the highest possible rate, plus interest, on the income once it is distributed to the PFIC shareholder.

PFIC shareholders generally have been required to file a Form 8621, "Information Return by a Shareholder of a Passive Foreign Investment Company or Qualified Electing Fund," in certain circumstances, such as when they receive amounts that are considered "excess distributions" or, for those shareholders that have made the Qualified Electing Fund (or "QEF") election, annually, A statutory change enacted in 2010, however, broadened PFIC reporting requirements to require PFIC shareholders to file annual reports containing any information required by the IRS. Failure to report the requested information to the IRS causes the shareholder's US federal income tax return to remain open until three years after the relevant information is in fact provided to the IRS. Whether the shareholder's entire tax return or just the portion of the tax return related to the investment in the PFIC remains subject to IRS audit during this period depends on whether the shareholder is eligible for the "reasonable cause" exception for failing to file the required information.

In Notice 2010-34 and Notice 2011-55, the IRS stated that it was developing future guidance on this new annual PFIC reporting requirement and would release a revised Form 8621. The IRS instructed PFIC shareholders to continue reporting in accordance with the current form and instructions. Once the new Form 8621 was released, however, PFIC shareholders which were not required to report under the old Form 8621 but which were required to report under the new Form 8621 would be required to file "catch-up" reports for the intervening years and attach the completed forms to their next US federal income tax return.

The New Regulations

The most noteworthy aspect of the new regulations is their implementation of the annual filing requirements for PFIC shareholders. In particular, the new regulations make it clear that PFIC shareholders are subject to the new, broader PFIC reporting rules only for the 2013 taxable year. Accordingly, the regulations do not implement the IRS's previously announced intention to require PFIC shareholders subject to the new reporting rules to file Forms 8621 for pre-2013 years with their 2013 income tax returns.
The new PFIC reporting rules are fairly detailed. They include some exceptions, particularly for US persons that hold PFIC stock through another US person or that hold relatively small amounts of PFIC stock. Nonetheless, because the rules for determining ownership in a PFIC are complicated and apply to indirect ownership, determining whether one qualifies for an exception may not be obvious at first blush. For example, the temporary regulations include an exception for a PFIC shareholder that:
  1. holds, in the aggregate, no more than $25,000 in PFIC stock ($50,000 if married filing jointly) or
  2. owns PFIC shares through another PFIC and the value of the shareholder's proportionate share of the upper-tier PFIC's interest in the lower-tier PFIC does not exceed $5,000. 
But this exception applies only if the PFIC shareholder has not:
  1. made an election to treat the PFIC as a QEF,
  2. made an election to subject the PFIC shares to mark-to-market treatment, and
  3. received any amounts that are treated as "excess distributions" from the PFIC.
US persons that own, directly or indirectly, interests in foreign corporations will therefore need to undertake a careful review each year to determine whether they own interests in a PFIC and whether a reporting exception applies. Of course, even if a reporting exception applies in a given year, the reporting exception does not provide any relief from the general PFIC taxation rules that apply to the shareholder.
The package also includes, in updated form, some regulatory definitions first proposed in 1992 related to different types of PFICs and to determining ownership (especially indirect ownership) of interests in a PFIC. The regulations also formalize guidance promised in prior IRS announcements, such as limiting duplicative reporting that would otherwise occur if shares owned by a US person constituted both a PFIC and a specified foreign financial asset, each with its own set of reporting rules. They also make some very minor changes to reporting for controlled foreign corporations, or "CFCs". In addition, the preamble to the temporary regulations promises more guidance for trusts and estates.

Conclusion

Because a single share of stock in a PFIC is enough to subject a shareholder to the PFIC rules and a person can be a PFIC shareholder through indirect ownership, US investors should review their holdings to determine whether they own interests in PFICs and, if they do, whether they are in compliance with the US tax and reporting rules that apply. Failure to do so could result in serious US tax exposure. Even if the amount of US income tax attributable to the PFIC is itself small, the failure to report the PFIC information can toll the statute of limitations, allowing the shareholder's entire tax return to stay open and subject to audit for as long as the PFIC information goes unreported, plus three years.
Posted on 2:43 PM | Categories:

Tax shock ahead for wealthy

BRIAN FALER for Politico writes: The wealthy may be in for a bit of a jolt this tax season.
That’s because Democrats have pushed through several new taxes on the well-to-do — many coming online this year — making the top tax bite steeper than advertised. By how much is a matter of opinion, but some experts say the true top rate is about 45 percent — 5 percentage points higher than the usual sticker price or higher still depending on what’s included in the mix. 

“People are going to be very surprised in April,” said former Congressional Budget Office Director Robert Reischauer.

Democrats are pushing to make income inequality a major election-year issue with high-profile bids to extend jobless benefits and raise the minimum wage. But they’ve already had some victories moving the tax burden up the income ladder, reversing Bush-era policies that had slashed levies on the rich, especially on investment income.

Taxes on capital gains, for example, top out at 25 percent, once various surcharges are included, a sharp increase from 2012.

Some of the taxes won’t begin being paid until this year so many taxpayers may not yet realize their impact.

The newest taxes, designed to help defray the cost of Obama’s 2010 health care law, didn’t begin taking effect until the 2013 tax year. One requires individuals earning more than $200,000 and couples above $250,000 to pay an additional 0.9 percent Medicare tax, in addition to the program’s 2.9 percent payroll tax. That’s projected to raise $87 billion over a decade, according to Congress’s Joint Committee on Taxation.

Though tax-filing season doesn’t begin until Jan. 31, some may already be feeling the bite because employers are required to withhold the tax from individuals earning more than $200,000.

Thanks to quirks in the law, some may be subject to the tax but not paying it while others who are exempt may nevertheless be paying it, said David Kautter, managing director of the Kogod Tax Center at American University.

That’s because the law requires employers to withhold the tax from employees earning $200,000 even if they file jointly and, as a married couple, their combined income is not enough to subject them to the levy. In those cases, the IRS will make it up to them later with a bigger tax refund.

“You can sleep easier knowing you’ve made an interest-free loan to the U.S. Treasury,” he said.
Conversely, employers won’t withhold it from those making less than $200,000 even if, as a married couple, their combined income requires them to pay. In those cases, taxpayers will have to adjust their income tax withholding or pay estimated taxes in order to avoid underpayment penalties, he said.

The health care law also imposes a new 3.8 percent “net investment” tax on capital gains, dividend, interest and other investments, in addition to the regular 20 percent capital gains tax. That’s expected to generate $123 billion over a decade.

Those two provisions alone mean those earning more than $1 million will see their tax bills increase by an average $41,000, cutting their after-tax income by about 2.2 percent, according to the nonpartisan Tax Policy Center.

“It’s not like they’re going to miss meals,” said Bob Williams, a fellow at the nonpartisan group. “But as a share of income, it’s a substantial change. … Those are not small numbers.”
The increases come on top of ones Democrats won last January as part of the fiscal cliff agreement. That upped the top tax rate to 39.6 percent, from 35 percent, the first increase in a generation. It applies to individuals earning $400,000 and couples earning $450,000 or more.
The deal also included other, stealthier increases on high earners. One provision, known in the tax world as “Pease,” reduces the itemized deductions they may take by 3 percent of every dollar for individuals who earn above $250,000. That adds about 1.2 percentage points to the top rate, Kautter said.

Another provision, known as “PEP,” phases out the value of the personal exemption by 2 percent for every $2,500 earned above $250,000.

It’s no accident that some of the increases come in complicated formulas, said Clint Stretch, senior tax counsel at the nonpartisan Tax Analysts. Politicians find it easier to approve hard-to-understand increases than straightforward rate hikes.

“Congress is afraid of raising people’s taxes,” Stretch said. “So if you can play some games with them” or “if you can do it in a way that people cannot possibly understand what the hell you’re doing,” it is easier to swallow, he said.

All of that means the actual top rate is 44.6 percent, Kautter said.

That doesn’t mean the wealthy pay 45 percent of their income in taxes. Marginal rates are applied to the last dollar earned and they increase like stair steps. So someone earning $500,000 pays the same rate on say, the first $75,000 as a person earning just $75,000. As income increases, higher rates apply.

He adds the combined 3.8 percent Medicare tax as well as the 1.2 percentage point Pease increase to the 39.6 percent rate (in 2013, the 12.4 percent Social Security tax only applies to the first $113,700 in income). The Pease provisions also apply to capital gains, which, along with the 3.8 percent investment tax, push their top rate to 25 percent. In 2012, the top rate was 15 percent.
That will cut the after-tax income of the top 1 percent, who earn at least $506,000, by about $50,000 or about 4.5 percent, according to the Tax Policy Center. The bite is much bigger for the very rich. Those who earn at least $2.6 million, enough to put them in the top one-tenth of 1 percent, will lose about $322,000 or about 6.2 percent of their income.

Of course, the wealthy have savvy tax planners who can minimize these new levies.
Kautter predicted the new investment tax would inspire new forms of tax avoidance, as the rich shift money into forms and vehicles not subject to the levy.
Posted on 1:56 PM | Categories:

Exploring a Hidden Gem of Professional Accounting Research: Online Library Guides

 for AllBusiness.com writes: Answering tough accounting questions often involves pinning down moving targets:  contexts differ, regulations change, technologies evolve, and best practices get refined.  In fact, the Big Four firms alone generate over one hundred billion dollars of annual revenue simply by helping companies cut through the confusion and solve their accounting issues.

But if your company is a small businesses, you probably handle the majority of your accounting in-house.  That’s significant because your ability to identify the right answers to your accounting questions will heavily influence such fundamental business outcomes as:
  • The size of your tax burden,
  • The degree to which you can fully capture costs for billing,
  • The quality of your financial data for making planning decisions,
  • And, even overall profitability.
Given the importance of sourcing the right accounting answers, let me pose a relevant question: Do you have a reliable, go-to resource for instances when you need to conduct critical accounting research?

If your answer is no, it doesn’t have to be.  There’s actually a resource you can access at any time that’s easy-to-use, unbiased, and carefully vetted by experts.   Better yet, it’s free.

Online Library Resource Guides: Putting an Unexpected Resource to Work for You
Online library research guides dedicated to the subject of accounting can be tremendously useful to small business owners, financial executives, and accounting professionals.
What is an online library research guide?  Essentially, a library research guide is a collection of topical resources curated by subject librarians at higher education institutions designed to help researchers source authoritative information.

Library guides are publicly accessible via the internet and not at all hard to find.  While they are designed with the intention of assisting students (a portion of the resources often require student registration to access them), the bottom-line is that they are a great asset for professionals, as well.  Consider some of the web resources collected in accounting library resource guides which are openly available to professionals:   standards organizations, trade associations, influential journals, software and CPA directories, tutorials, and governmental tax publications.

Why Give Online Library Guides a Try? Here’s 5 Reasons
Google may always be your first stop for a quick search.  But if sourcing an answer to an accounting question is turning out to be trickier than expected or you just need to focus in on the most credible results, it’s worth giving online library research guides a try.
The reasons accounting subject guides work well for students are the same reasons they provide value to the professional.  In the words of the professionals who compile the guides, these resource collections are:

1.  Reliable and quick.
“A good library guide will save a user time by organizing the key resources, by directing the user to the best sources right off the bat, and by they telling a user (or implying to a user) which sources are most reliable.”  Tom Ottaviano, Cornell University

2.  Relevant.
“I would say that the value add of library guides is that they take some of the randomness of an internet search out of the equation.  They can direct students to more relevant information.” -Tom Orrange, Medaille College

3. Plugged into the professional community.
“I include accounting associations… The purpose of a library or an accounting libguide is not to merely direct patrons to business-related publications…  Even the best literature in the field is no substitute for making connections with other accounting professionals.” -Curt Friehs, The College at Old Westbury-State University of New York

4.  Independent and unbiased.
 “Any sites that appear to be selling something or are biased don’t make the cut.  Google is great, but web searches return a lot of commercial content and a ton of unprofessional, opinion type content.”  -Lily Morgan, Independence Community College

5.  Spam free.
“Google also doesn’t guard against spam and un-trusted websites. Guides written by human librarians will not have these.” -Karen Niemla, University of Louisiana-Monroe

26 Great Guides for Every Neck of the Woods
Not every university or college offers online library research guides.  But there are quite a few out there which do.

How do you find the most useful guide for your needs?  Often it’s useful to target a guide from a school in your region, as many guides will have a local focus, especially when it comes to links to professional organizations.  Also, it’s worth exploring several different collections.  Certain web resources come up time and time again in the online guides, but each college has its own distinct approach, drilling more deeply into particular focus areas.
Here’s a list of some of the most bookmark-worthy guides I’ve found, organized by region (colleges belong in brackets, right?), including observations on what might make each guide especially useful foryour research purposes.

East
  • Compiled by: Curt Friehs
  • Don’t miss:  This guide includes a section dedicated to CPA Exam Prep, useful to many professionals looking to advance their career with accounting certification.
2. Queens College (Queens, NY)
  • Compiled by:  Manuel Sanudo
  • Don’t miss:  The Queens College resource page offers a strong local focus with a number of links to New York state organizations.
3.  Medaille College (Buffalo, NY)
  • Compiled by: Tom Orrange
  • Don’t miss:  I’m always looking for unique resources for professional research.  This page provided a couple I’d previously missed: an excellent free online textbook and the QuickMBA accounting tutorials.
4. Boston University (Boston, MA)
  • Compiled by: Arlyne Jackson
  • Don’t miss:  The concise descriptions of resources provide researchers a clear understanding of the value and purpose of each link from the guide page.
5. St. Joseph’s University (Philadelphia, PA)
  • Compiled by:  Cynthia Slater
  • Don’t miss:  While the St. Joseph’s collection is slanted more heavily to journals and library resources that require student registration, the area dedicated to international accounting is a great place to start research on the topic.
6.  Cornell University (Ithaca, NY)
  • Compiled by: Tom Ottaviano
  • Don’t miss:  At first the Cornell page may seem to be of use only to students, as the collection takes advantage of a robust set of journals and databases, but there are a couple very nice hidden gems in the career section for professionals seeking quality job resources.
7.   University at Albany (Albany, NY)
  • Compiled by: Chris Poehlmann
  • Don’t miss:  This guide provides a section dedicated to accounting tutorials, especially useful for continued professional accounting development.
West & Great Plains: 
8.  San Jose State University (San Jose, CA)
  • Compiled by: Ann Agee
  • Don’t miss:  The San Jose State guide balances links to standards boards, professional organizations, and other resources, with finance and accounting news via a MarketWatch.com feed.
9. Rio Salado College (Tempe, AZ)
  • Compiled by: Kirstin Thomas
  • Don’t miss:  With more personality and visual attention than most subject guides, this collection also directly engages the question of how to most effectively conduct searches with resources discussing that very topic.
10.  Independence Community College (Independence, KS)
  • Compiled by: Lily Morgan
  • Don’t miss:   The attention to detail and local-focus is evident, as this collection includes links to multiple Kansas-based professional associations.
11. Gonzaga University (Spokane, WA)
  • Compiled by:  Linda Pierce
  • Don’t miss:  The Gonzaga University collection offers links to several auditing focused research sources and provides a good starting point for professionals tracking down compliance and fraud information.
12.  Washington State University (Pullman, WA)
  • Compiled by: Mary Gilles
  • Don’t miss:  The one-page format of this library guide makes it easy to scan and useful for quickly identifying top research sources in the form of the most helpful .org and .gov sites.
13. Salt Lake Community College (Salt Lake City, UT)
  • Compiled by:  Michael Toy
  • Don’t miss:  Community and technical colleges have earned a reputation of often being more likely to get ahead of universities in terms of responsiveness to technical trends.  The inclusion of multiple accounting software related resources in this collection further supports this notion.
14.  University of Montana (Missoula, MT)
  • Compiled by:  Susan Caro
  • Don’t miss:  The U of M guide includes accounting related sources as part of a wider collection of business resources.  It’s a good bet for professionals whose role includes accounting as part of a larger set of responsibilities.
South:
15.  University of South Carolina (Columbia, SC)
  • Compiled by: Emily Doyle
  • Don’t miss:   This guide features the most extensive collection of resources related to financial statement generation I’ve encountered.
16.  University of Louisiana-Monroe (Monroe, LA)
  • Compiled by: Karen Niemla
  • Don’t miss:  The Univesity of Lousiana-Monroe collection features links to a handful of excellent .gov sites that are often overlooked:  the Office of the Law Revision Counsel, the Financial Management Service, and the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network.
17.  Southeastern University (Lakeland, FL)
  •  Compiled by:  Kathleen Kempa
  • Don’t miss:   This collection is heavily focused on professional development resources with links to 10 different  associations for accountants.
18. Houston Community College (Houston, TX)
  • Compiled by: Angela Secrest
  • Don’t miss:  Aside from including a very well organized and varied set of resources, the inclusion of multiple open educational resources is particularly useful.
Midwest:
19.  Franklin University (Columbus, OH)
  • Compiled by: Alyssa Darden
  • Don’t miss:  The Franklin University page features a strong focus on associations, including links to organizations dedicated to government accountants, accounting historians, African-American accountants, internal auditors, and management accountants.
20.  Michigan State University (East Lansing, MI)
  • Compiled by: Breezy Silver
  • Don’t miss:  This guide is particularly well organized with databases, journals, standards organizations, disclosures, and career resources clearly delineated and grouped into their own areas, making research easier.  The CPAdirectory.com link is a useful, but often overlooked resource.
21. Youngstown State University (Youngstown, OH)
  • Compiled by:  Christine Adams
  • Don’t Miss:  The Youngstown State University guide is notable for its depth.  It is one of the more comprehensive web resource collections to be found on library guides.
22.  University of Northwestern (St. Paul, MN)
  • Compiled by:  Jessica Moore
  • Don’t miss:  This private university’s resource page covers the usual standards and organizations links, but also includes links to notable business and accounting thought leaders such as Harvard Business Review, Entrepreneur, and the Library of Economics and Liberty.
23.  Edgewood College (Madison, WI)
  • Compiled by:  Jonathan Bloy
  • Don’t miss:  The concise guide to conducting keyword driven accounting research on the “Searching Tips” page is worth checking out.
24.  Kent State University (Kent, OH) 
  • Compiled by: Karen MacDonald
  • Don’t miss:  The Kent State University page includes easy access to industry classification code resources, as well as concise coverage of professional associations and accounting regulations .gov sites.
25.  Wayne State University (Detroit, MI)
  • Compiled by:  Rhonda McGinnis
  • Don’t miss:  This guide features an especially strong focus on taxation, including not only the more standard .gov sites, but useful .com directory and information sites.
26.  Marquette University (Milwaukee, WI)

  • Compiled by: Valerie Beech
  • Don’t miss:  Marquette’s accounting resource collection includes a page dedicated to standards based research.  While a few of the sources are restricted to student access, the page includes freely accessible links to numerous other standards setting bodies.
Posted on 11:39 AM | Categories: