Monday, January 27, 2014

10 Things Fishbowl Inventory Can Do That QuickBooks Can’t

Fishbowl Inventory is an inventory management solution that lets you do many things that even QuickBooks Enterprise can’t.
Fishbowl Inventory QuickBooks integration, Fishbowl Inventory BlogBecause it offers so many features beyond QuickBooks and it integrates with that popular accounting software, Fishbowl Inventory lets small and midsize businesses stay with QuickBooks for much longer than they otherwise could as they outgrow QuickBooks’ feature set.
Here are 10 inventory management features Fishbowl Inventory offers that QuickBooks does not:
1. Advanced Bill of Materials
Fishbowl Inventory lets you create bills of materials for a variety of purposes, including simple assembly and multilevel assembly jobs. QuickBooks only supports a bill of materials for simply assembly work.
2. Barcode Generating and Printing
You can generate, print, and scan barcodes using Fishbowl Inventory. QuickBooks is incapable of generating or printing barcodes, but it does allow users to scan already-existing barcodes.
3. Extra Accounting Methods
Fishbowl Inventory supports Average Costing, First In First Out (FIFO), Last In First Out (LIFO), and Standard Cost accounting methods. QuickBooks only lets you use Average Costing and FIFO.
4. Kitting
A kit is a group of products that are all combined into a single end product. Fishbowl Inventory lets you add a number of kits to a sales order. QuickBooks does not have a kitting feature.
5. Multipurpose Work Orders
Similar to its bill of materials feature, Fishbowl Inventory allows users to create work orders for manufacturing jobs involving simple assembly, multistage assembly, disassembly, repair, replacement, and more. Complex jobs with multiple work orders are grouped under manufacture orders. Again, QuickBooks only allows for simple assembly jobs.
6. Part Tracking Criteria
Fishbowl Inventory has the option to track parts by lot numbers, serial numbers, revision levels, expiration dates, and any other criteria you can think of through its custom fields. QuickBooks only allows you to track parts by either lot number or serial number.
7. Return Merchandise Authorization
Fishbowl Inventory can issue Return Merchandise Authorizations (RMA) to receive returned items, send replacements or substitutions to customers, repair items, or refund the purchase amount. QuickBooks does not process RMAs.
8. Status Updates
Fishbowl Inventory lets you check the status of a manufacturing job by seeing what stage it is at on the bill of materials or work order. QuickBooks Pro and Premier do not offer this status update feature, though QuickBooks Enterprise does.
9. Transfer Orders
Fishbowl Inventory uses transfer orders to move parts, finished goods, and other materials within a warehouse or between locations. Transfer orders don’t require an invoice since nothing is being sold. QuickBooks does not have a feature specifically allowing products to move from one location to another without making a purchase or sale.
10. Variable Prices and Discounts
Fishbowl Inventory lets you offer customers variable pricing and discounts on products in the form of a percent discount, a specific dollar amount off, group pricing, and/or cost-plus pricing. QuickBooks only lets you use a percent discount or a specific dollar amount off.
Above and Beyond
This list really just scratches the surface of the functionality Fishbowl Inventory offers above and beyond QuickBooks. All of these features are a big reason why Fishbowl Inventory is the No. 1 inventory management software for QuickBooks users.  Learn more about Fishbowl Inventory by scheduling an inventory software demo today.
Posted on 7:34 PM | Categories:

Health savings accounts gain in popularity / They're a great way to save on federal taxes, but state treatments differ widely

Darla Mercado for InvestmentNews.com writes: Tax-advantaged saving on a federal level is bolstering the popularity of health savings accounts, but clients ought to know that those attributes don't always apply from a state income tax perspective.
Health savings accounts, the investment account that typically accompanies high-deductible health plans, are enjoying a boost: In 2013, some 7.2 million people had HSAs, up from 6.6 million in 2012, according to the Employee Benefit Research Institute. During that period, assets also leapt, reaching $16.6 billion in 2013, up from $11.3 billion in the previous year.
HSAs typically run in tandem with a high-deductible health care plan, with the intention that insured people tap the HSA itself to cover qualified medical expenses. Employers and insurers generally like HSAs because insured people are using the account to foot the bill for services until they hit their deductible. In theory, if employees are aware of the real cost of medical services because they are shelling out for those expenses, they'll become more educated consumers, according to Paul Fronstin, senior research associate at EBRI.
Employers and employees can contribute to HSAs, and the chief benefit is that the funds contributed won't be subject to federal income taxes when deposited. Any distributions made for qualified medical expenses can be made without incurring taxes. Any part of a distribution that doesn't go toward these expenses counts toward gross income and will face an additional 20% levy.
In 2014, annual HSA contributions for both employers and employees are capped at $3,300 for individuals and $6,550 for families. Those over 55 can make an HSA catch-up contribution of up to $1,000. Minimum deductibles for high-deductible health care plans, meanwhile, are at $1,250 for individuals and $2,500 for families.
Further, money saved in an HSA can be carried over to the following year.
With the proliferation of HSAs, advisers and clients ought to be aware of their state's treatment of the vehicles. Three states — Alabama, California and New Jersey — treat contributions to HSAs as income for tax purposes: .
HSAs via high-deductible health plans aren't commonplace yet in Alabama, as many employers get coverage through Blue Cross Blue Shield, according to Jimmy Williamson, an accountant at MDA Professional Group PC. But he expects that landscape to change thanks to health care reform — and that will help high-deductible plans and HSAs proliferate.
“The employer mandate [to provide health care coverage] has been pushed back to 2015, but as that year comes about, we'll see more HSAs and high-deductible plans,” Mr. Williamson said.
In Alabama, the top individual income tax rate is only at 5%, so once the plans become popular, having HSA contributions subject to state income taxes likely won't deter employees from saving, Mr. Williamson added.
In New Jersey, though workers will have to count their contributions as part of their income, they can still be eligible for deductions on the amount they paid out of pocket for unreimbursed medical expenses — as long as the amount exceeds 2% of adjusted gross income — according to V. Peter Traphagen Jr., a partner at Traphagen Financial Group.
“Many employees in New Jersey can pick up the tax deduction,” he said. “You have to do some bookkeeping and due diligence, but it's well worth the savings.” The firm is actively encouraging clients to use the plans, as the federal tax benefits outweigh the fact that the contributions count toward income in the Garden State.
Finally, in California, contributions to HSAs will mean higher wages reported on state tax forms. There, clients fill out CA Form 540 and Schedule CA to spell out the differences between wages for state and federal purposes, according to Mary Kay Foss, an accountant with Sweeney Kovar.
As in other states, distributions from the HSA are reported on Form 8889 for federal purposes, and the taxpayer puts in the amount of unreimbursed medical expenses for which the distributions were used. In California, however, those medical expenses count as an additional deduction as long as they are in excess of the Schedule A limitation on the federal return, according to Ms. Foss.
In the Golden State, if the HSA earns dividends or interest, these are tax free on a federal basis, but need to be reported on state tax returns, she added.
Again, determining the best course of action for using an HSA comes down to weighing the benefits from a federal income tax planning perspective. The accounts constitute a brilliant retirement savings vehicle, since they can act as a pool for medical costs years later. “You have a pool of money that you can use tax free; you can save it and get reimbursed for medical expenses down the road,” said Monica Rebella, an accountant at Rebella Accountancy Corp.
Nevertheless, she warned that clients ought to dig into the details of their coverage before opting for the HSA. “Some people find out that certain prescription costs go up tremendously when you take the HSA versus full insurance coverage,” Ms. Rebella said. “You have to figure out how that [election] is affecting your family.”
Posted on 2:42 PM | Categories:

Considering the Impact of the Capital Gains Tax Deduction

Examiner.com writes: For most Americans, the discounted tax for capital gains serves as a long-term incentive to invest their monies as to ensure their financial future and continued economic grow for the country. For wealthier Americans, however, the discount is not an incentive to invest; it affords them a windfall for monies they would have already invested, though altering the tax benefit may change how they invest. As stock markets afford individuals a convenient vehicle for their investments, versus directly risking their savings in a business venture in a more localized economy, most people invest in our national/global economy through a 401K retirement plan, an IRA, a mutual fund, bonds, CDs, and other financial instruments. In terms of the above analysis, this means monies are funneled into investments sanctioned by the government with the greatest benefits going to those segments expected to grow the fastest.
The benefit to the economy is a readily available, broad base source of capital that can be used to expand economic activities in the Wall Street economy and, originally, the Main Street. This has helped make the financial sector one of the strongest. Unfortunately, the financial sector does not demand a great deal of labor as compared to the greatly diminished manufacturing sector and the overall need for jobs. Consequently, steering too much money into the financial sector may well have been what hurt the economy as a whole, because doing so diverts money away from the economic activities that financially benefit the majority of Americans. Growing economic disparity, stagnate/shrinking wages, and lackluster job creation as the capital gains tax has been cut hints at the validity of this argument.
People need well paying jobs to sustain strong consumer spending, i.e. the lifeblood of the economy, and build their investment portfolios, i.e. access the benefits of economic growth and supply the economy with capital, while enjoying a comfortable lifestyle. When the majority of people lose their ability to both afford a comfortable lifestyle and invest for their futures, the economy becomes unsustainable. From the 1970's until about 2008, average income Americans were able to compensate for diminishing wages and lost financial opportunities by working longer hours, living on multiple incomes, decreasing family size, forgoing certain luxuries, relying on state support, and, in the case of the growing poor classes, forgoing necessities, thus ultimately hurting themselves in the future.
Furthermore, today's economy is built on increasing returns to those who can afford to be investors. This translates into a situation where an excess of capital is driven toward investments with the highest payouts, thus creating economic bubbles. In turn, Wall Street firms and affluent individuals have been increasingly able to use extremes in the markets to siphon capital out of the economy, especially with their use of exotic financial instruments and commodity futures. Because emerging economies often see periods of faster grow than developed economies, capital is being increasingly routed to outside ventures via investor choices, especially among professional investors, an over reliance on imports, outsourcing, and crescendoing commodities prices.
In tandem, production is cheaper in underdeveloped countries due to abundant, underdeveloped natural resources, cheaper human resources, and a lack of important regulations while only a relatively few in these underdeveloped countries significantly benefit from the exploitation of their national resources. As such, excess capital does not primarily benefit the majority in developed countries paying the price for the capital gains subsidies in terms of lost opportunities in labor-intensive industries. In fact, it is fueling the growth in underdeveloped counties, which is undercutting labor-intensive industries in developed countries instead of fueling novel industries throughout the world. Although the US, Japan, and Europe are stalwart economic safe havens, growing uncertainty in these economies and growing, yet fluctuating, confidence in emerging markets means capital is more often going to be diverted to developing nations in the future. Manufacturing, for example, has started to return to the US, but price instability for commodities like oil is helping to drive this resurgence; should costs stabilize and foreign imports continue to become more reliable, as is needed, this industry and similar ones will once again see decline.
Consequently, the capital gains tax needs to be recalibrated to better reflect the interests of national economies. Beyond an immediate, honest effort to better understand and discuss the effects of tax policy, we need to hold a constructive public forum on the issue that can actually translate into action. This starts with economists developing economic models that do not overvalue wealth capital by undercutting the value of intellectual and labor capital. In other words, the parameters of economic models need to focus on serving the interests of the average citizen. Any action by policymakers will likely facilitate already inevitable corrections in economic sectors where growth has been inflated and economic measures have focused far too heavily on, yet over time such policy shifts will stabilize our economy and promote sustainable growth where we need it the most.
(As for double taxation, tax purchases made with already taxed earned income is a situation where double taxation occurs. Applying both a capital gains tax to funds subject to a corporate income tax is, at least, just as unfair. That said, governments often allow corporations some deduction or accounting trick to, essentially, reduce double taxation. When the capital gains tax is solely applied to the returns on an investment, not the original principle, double taxation is not in play.)
US policy may well eventually cap the benefit of the capital gains income tax, so it can act solely as an incentive for middle-income households. Paying down the National Debt is one option for spending the increased revenue while shifting the tax savings associated with the truncation of the capital gains tax discount is another. Cutting overall tax rates would be nice, but governments might consider subsidizing another type of capital that would drive growth where it is most needed. With free trade, policymakers and economists assumed America would develop an economy fueled by the service sector and intellectual property. Clearly, this model does not provide for the interests of most Americans as most do not own significantly valuable intellectual property and service industry jobs are often low paying, but policy shifts can help better spur the good paying jobs people need.
Improved business models, technological advances, economic uncertainty, and a lack of demand have created an economy that does not need the skills and labor of millions. Innovations and the spread of new technology can, however, create good paying jobs by sparking novel industries. Coupled with improved patent laws, offering a tax discount on par with current capital gains tax deductions for royalty payments on novel technologies and other innovations would make them far more valuable. By making patents and other intellectual property more valuable, financial capital would be steered toward innovation, thus ultimately creating new industries and jobs.
Posted on 2:42 PM | Categories:

Final Regulations on 3.8 Percent Medicare Tax charitable remainder trusts, charitable gift annuities, pooled income funds and charitable lead trusts.

Conrad Teitell for WealthManagement writes: The regulations give guidance under Internal Revenue Code Section 1411 for taxable years starting Jan. 1, 2013. They affect individuals, trusts and estates.
Explained here are the provisions dealing—directly or indirectly—with charitable remainder trusts, charitable gift annuities, pooled income funds and charitable lead trusts. Warning: Rough going!
First Some Background
The 3.8 Percent Medicare Surtax for individuals. Starting in 2013, in addition to any other tax, a 3.8 percent tax is imposed on the lesser of: (A) the individual’s net investment income for the taxable year, or (B) the excess (if any) of: (i) the individual’s modified adjusted gross income (AGI) for the taxable year, over (ii) the threshold amount. The threshold amount(s) are: (1) for a taxpayer filing a joint return or as a surviving spouse, $250,000; (2) for a married taxpayer filing a separate return, $125,000; and (3) in any other case, $200,000. For most taxpayers, modified AGI istheir AGI. “Modified” applies only to taxpayers living abroad and using the foreign earned income exclusion. Note. The dollar thresholds for individuals are established by statute and aren't indexed for inflation.
What is net investment income? Simply stated (ifs, ands and buts abound), it's gross income from interest, dividends, annuities, rents and net capital gains. Excluded from net investment income are items, such as tax-exempt bond interest, excludable gain on the sale of a principal residence and qualified retirement plan distributions.
For estates or trusts. A tax (in addition to any other tax) for each taxable year, starting in 2013, is imposed equal to 3.8 percent of the lesser of: (A) the estate’s or trust’s undistributed net investment income, or (B) the excess (if any) of: (i) the estate’s or trust’s AGI for the taxable year, over (ii) the dollar amount at which the highest tax bracket in IRC Section 1(e) begins for the taxable year. Translation. That threshold amount for 2013 is $11,950, and for 2014, it's $12,150 (indexed for inflation in future years).

Now for the Regulations
CHARITABLE REMAINDER TRUSTS
Bear with me. I’ll first tell you about the proposed regulations, before telling about the final regulations. Read on and you’ll see why both are important.
The proposed regulations provided special computational rules for the classification of the income of and the distributions from charitable remainder trusts (CRTS), solely for IRC Section §1411 purposes. Proposed Reg. Section 1.1411-3(c)(2)(i) provided that distributions from a CRT to a beneficiary for a taxable year consist of net investment income in an amount equal to the lesser of the total amount of the distributions for that year or the current and accumulated net investment income of the CRT. Proposed Reg. Section 1.1411-3(c)(2)(iii) defined the term accumulated net investment income (ANII) as the total amount of net investment income received by a CRT for all taxable years beginning after Dec. 31, 2012, less the total amount of net investment income distributed for all prior taxable years beginning after Dec. 31, 2012. 
The Treasury acknowledged in the preamble to the proposed regulations that the classification of income as net investment income or non-net investment income would be separate from, and in addition to, the four tiers under IRC Section 664(b), which would continue to apply. The Treasury also stated in the preamble that it considered an alternative method for determining the distributed amount of net investment income under which net investment income would be determined on a class-by-class basis within each of the Reg. Section 1.664-1(d)(1) enumerated categories. The Treasury acknowledged that, although differentiating between net investment income and non-net investment income within each class and category might be more consistent with the structure created for CRTs by IRC Section 664 and its regulations, the Treasury was concerned that the apparent record-keeping and compliance burdens on trustees would outweigh the benefits of this alternative. 
Multiple commentators asked that the final regulations follow the existing rules under IRC Section 664 that create subclasses in each category of income as the tax rates on certain types of income are changed from time to time. They said that CRT trustees are already maintaining the appropriate records and are familiar with the existing rules, so compliance would be less complicated than under the new system described in the proposed regulations. Some of the commentators suggested that the final regulations allow the trustee to elect between the method described in the proposed regulations and the existing rules under IRC Section 664. 
The final regulations (IRC Section 1.1411-3(d)(2)) adopt the commentators' request to categorize and distribute net investment income based on the existing IRC Section 664 category and class system.
The provisions of Reg. Section 1.1411-3(d)(2) (discussed in the preamble to the proposed regulations) will apply to CRT taxable years that begin after Dec. 31, 2012, provided, however, that, for CRTs that relied on the proposed regulations for returns filed before the publication of the final regulations in the Federal Register on Dec. 2, 2013, the CRT and its beneficiary (as applicable) don't have to amend their returns to comply with rules in the final regulations. For such a CRT, when transitioning from the method in the proposed regulations to the method in the final regulations, the CRT may use any reasonable method to allocate the remaining undistributed net investment income for that year to the categories and classes under IRC Section 664. 
The final regulations retain the concept of ANII. ANII is the total amount of net investment income received by a charitable remainder trust for all taxable years beginning after Dec. 31, 2012, less the total amount of net investment income distributed for all prior taxable years beginning after Dec. 31, 2012. The final regulations apply the IRC Section 664 category and class system to ANII by providing that the federal income tax rate applicable to an item of ANII, for purposes of allocating that item of ANII to the appropriate class within a category of income, as described in Reg. Section 1.664-1(d)(1), is the sum of the income tax rate imposed on that item under chapter 1 and the rate of the tax imposed under IRC Section 1411. Thus, if a charitable remainder trust has both excluded income (such as income received by the trust prior to Jan. 1, 2013, or other income received after Dec. 31, 2012 but excluded from net investment income) and ANII in an income category, such excluded income and ANII will constitute separate classes of income for purposes of Reg. Section 1.664-1(d)(1)(i)(b). 
The Treasury says that special rules are necessary to apply the IRC Section 664 category and class system contained in Reg. Section 1.664-1(d) to certain distributions made to CRTs that own interests in controlled foreign corporations (CFCs) and passive foreign investment companies (PFICs) not making the Reg. Section 1.1411-10(g) election to account for the difference between the income inclusion for chapter 1 and for IRC Section 1411 purposes.Accordingly, the final regulations reserve paragraph Reg. Section 1.1411-3(d)(2)(ii) for special rules in this case. The companion notice of proposed rule-making (REG-130843-13) contains special rules relating to CFCs and PFICs and is proposed to be effective for tax years beginning after Dec. 31, 2013.
The final regulations reserve Reg. Section 1.1411-3(d)(3) for rules allowing a CRT to elect between the simplified method contained in the proposed regulations and the IRC Section 664 method contained in the final regulations.The companion notice of proposed rule-making (REG-130843-13) provides rules to enable a CRT to choose between the simplified method described in the proposed regulations (with the modification noted in the companion notice) and the existing rules under Section 664. The rules contained in the companion proposed regulation are proposed to be effective for taxable years beginning after Dec. 31, 2012. Prop. Reg. Section 1.1411-3(d)(3)(i). 
In the case of a CRT established after Dec. 31, 2012, the CRT’s election must be made on its income tax return for the taxable year in which the CRT is established. In the case of a CRT established before Jan. 1, 2013, the CRT’s election must be made on its income tax return for its first taxable year beginning on or after Jan. 1, 2013. The CRT may make the election on an amended return for that year only if neither the taxable year for which the election is made, nor any taxable year that is affected by the election, for both the CRT and its beneficiaries, is closed by the period of limitations on assessments under IRC Section 6501. 

Once made, the election is irrevocable. Prop. Reg. Section 1.1411-3(d)(3)(iii).
What you have read so far is from the preamble to the final regulations. And now, with no fanfare, here are the final regulations:
(d) Application to charitable remainder trusts (CRTs)—(1) Operational rules—(i) Treatment of annuity or unitrust distributions. If one or more items of net investment income comprise all or part of an annuity or unitrust distribution from a CRT, such items retain their character as net investment income in the hands of the recipient of that annuity or unitrust distribution.
(ii) Apportionment among multiple beneficiaries. In the case of a CRT with more than one annuity or unitrust beneficiary, the net investment income is apportioned among such beneficiaries based on their respective shares of the total annuity or unitrust amount paid by the CRT for that taxable year.
(iii) Accumulated net investment income. The accumulated net investment income of a CRT is the total amount of net investment income received by a CRT for all taxable years that begin after December 31, 2012, less the total amount of net investment income distributed for all prior taxable years of the trust that begin after December 31, 2012.
(2) Application of Section 664—(i) General rule. The Federal income tax rate of the item of net investment income, to be used to determine the proper classification of that item within the appropriate income category as described in §1.664–1(d)(1)(i)(b), is the sum of the income tax rate applicable to that item under chapter 1 and the tax rate under section 1411. Thus, the accumulated net investment income and excluded income (as defined in §1.1411–1(d)(4)) of a CRT in the same income category constitute separate classes of income within that category as described in §1.664–1(d)(1)(i)(b).
(ii) Special rules for CRTs with income from CFCs or PFICs. [Reserved]
(iii) Examples. The following examples illustrate the provisions of this paragraph (d)(2).
Example 1. (i) In 2009, A formed CRT as a charitable remainder annuity trust. The trust document requires an annual annuity payment of $50,000 to A for 15 years. For purposes of this example, assume that CRT is a valid charitable remainder trust under section 664 and has not received any unrelated business taxable income during any taxable year.
(ii) As of January 1, 2013, CRT has the following items of undistributed income within its §1.664–1(d)(1) categories and classes:
CategoryClassTax RateAmount
Ordinary IncomeInterest39.6%$4,000
Net Rental Income39.6%$8,000
Non-Qualified Dividend Income39.6%$2,000
Qualified Dividend Income20.0%$10,000
Capital GainShort-Term39.6%$39,000
Unrecaptured Section 1250 Gain25.0%$1,000
Long-Term20.0%$560,000
Other IncomeNone
Total undistributed income as of January 1, 2013$624,000

Pursuant to §1.1411–3(d)(1)(iii), none of the $624,000 of undistributed income is accumulated net investment income (ANII) because none of it was received by CRT after December 31, 2012. Thus, the entire $624,000 of undistributed income is excluded income (as defined in §1.1411–1(d)(4)).
(iii) During 2013, CRT receives $7,000 of interest income, $9,000 of qualified dividend income, $4,000 of short-term capital gain, and $11,000 of long-term capital gain. Prior to the 2013 distribution of $50,000 to A, CRT has the following items of undistributed income within its §1.664–1(d)(1) categories and classes after the application of paragraph (d)(2) of this section:
CategoryClassExcluded / ANIITax RateAmount
Ordinary Income
InterestNII43.4%$7,000
InterestExcluded39.6%$4,000
Net Rental IncomeExcluded39.6%$8,000
Non-Qualified Dividend IncomeExcluded39.6%$2,000
Qualified Dividend IncomeNII23.8%$9,000
Qualified Dividend IncomeExcluded20.0%$10,000
Capital Gain
Short-TermNII43.4%$4,000
Short-TermExcluded39.6%$39,000
Unrecaptured Section 1250 GainExcluded25.0%$1,000
Long-TermNII23.8%$11,000
Long-TermExcluded20.0%$560,000
Other IncomeNone

(iv) The $50,000 distribution to A for 2013 will include the following amounts:
CategoryClassExcluded / ANIITax RateAmount
Ordinary Income
InterestNII43.4%$7,000
InterestExcluded39.6%$4,000
Net Rental IncomeExcluded39.6%$8,000
Non-Qualified Dividend IncomeExcluded39.6%$2,000
Qualified Dividend IncomeNII23.8%$9,000
Qualified Dividend IncomeExcluded20.0%$10,000
Capital Gain
Short-TermNII43.4%$4,000
Short-TermExcluded39.6%$6,000
Unrecaptured Section 1250 GainExcluded25.0%None
Long-TermNII23.8%None
Long-TermExcluded20.0%None

The amount included in A’s 2013 net investment income is $20,000. This amount is comprised of $7,000 of interest income, $9,000 of qualified dividend income, and $4,000 of short-term capital gain.
(v) As a result, as of January 1, 2014, CRT has the following items of undistributed income within its §1.664–1(d)(1) categories and classes:
CategoryClassExcluded / ANIITax RateAmount
Ordinary Income
InterestNone
Net Rental IncomeNone
Non-Qualified Dividend IncomeNone
Qualified Dividend IncomeNone
Capital Gain
Short-TermExcluded39.6%$33,000
Unrecaptured Section 1250 GainExcluded25.0%$1,000
Long-TermANII23.8%$11,000
Long-TermExcluded20.0%$560,000
Other IncomeNone

Keep in mind: Charitable remainder unitrusts and charitable remainder annuity trusts aren’t subject to the 3.8 percent Medicare surtax (IRC Section 1411). However, annuity and unitrust distributions may be net investment income to non-charitable recipient beneficiaries and that tax will apply to beneficiaries who have significant income.

CHARITABLE GIFT ANNUITIES
Here’s what you need to know. Earnings of funds held by charities for their gift annuity programs aren’t taxable, unless the charity runs afoul of the rules under IRC Sections 514(c)(5) and 501(m). But, annuity payments (other than the excludable amount—the deemed return of principal) are net investment income to the annuitant. And, any capital gain triggered by the transfer of appreciated assets for the gift annuity (under the bargain sale rules) is net investment income to the donor (who may or may not be an annuitant).
For those who want to know how jazz came up the Mississippi. One commentator requested that the final regulations clarify that net investment income from charitable gift annuities established post-2012 will be spread over the annuitant's life expectancy, similar to other items of income under Section 1.1011-2(c), Example 8. The commentator also requested that the final regulations clarify that the income recognized and distributed from charitable gift annuities established prior to 2013 isn't subject to the net investment income tax. The commentator asked that the final regulation extend the benefit afforded to CRTs regarding pre-2013 gifts to pre-2013 funded charitable gift annuities as well.
Treasury’s response. Charitable gift annuities, like installment sales and other tax deferral transactions, defer the recognition of income to a future year. Charitable gift annuities share more characteristics with installment sales than with CRTs. In the case of installment sales, amounts received in taxable years beginning after Dec. 31, 2012, on installment sales made prior to the effective date of section 1411 are included in net investment income, unless an exception applies. See Section 1.1411-4(d)(4)(i)(C), Example 2. A CRT, as defined in Section 664, must provide for the distribution of a specified payment, at least annually, to one or more persons (at least one of which is a non-charitable beneficiary). On the termination of the non-charitable interest or interests, the remainder must either be held in continuing trust for charitable purposes or be paid to or for the use of one or more organizations described in Section 170(c). During its operation, a CRT is a tax-exempt entity. Unlike charitable gift annuities, the federal income tax character of the income received by a CRT's annuity or unitrust beneficiary is dependent on the federal income tax character of the income received by the CRT in the year of distribution and, in many cases, income received in year(s) prior to the distribution. In the case of charitable gift annuities, the amount and character of the income paid to the annuity recipient generally is known at the inception of the annuity. Furthermore, the amount and character of the income paid to the annuity recipient is not dependent on the charity's use (or sale) of the property exchanged for the annuity. The Section 1411 policy reason behind the exclusion of pre-2013 accumulated income within a CRT from net investment income is that the character is passed through from the CRT to the recipient, and pre-2013 income isn't net investment income. Because the character of the distribution to the recipient of a charitable gift annuity is not dependent on its character in the hands of the payor, the final regulations don't adopt the requested change.

POOLED INCOME FUNDS
Here’s what you need to know:
Income earned by pooled income funds. A pooled income fund distributes all its income to the fund’s income beneficiaries. Thus, that income doesn’t subject the fund itself to the 3.8 percent tax. High income beneficiaries may be subject to the 3.8 percent tax under the rules on an individual’s net investment income discussed earlier.
Pooled income fund’s capital gains. They are never paid to the beneficiaries. So, the beneficiaries aren’t potentially subject to the 3.8 percent tax on capital gains.
Pooled income fund’s long-term capital gains. Those capital gains aren’t taxable to a pooled income fund under the “regular” income tax rules. And, they're permanently set aside for charity so they shouldn’t be subject to any type of federal tax to any one in sight.
Pooled income fund’s short-term capital gains. These gains are taxable to the fund under the “regular” income tax rules. And, the short-term gains over $11,950 for 2013 ($12,150 for 2014, indexed for inflation) are subject to the 3.8 percent tax. Note. Short-term capital gains, as well as long-term capital gains, are added to the fund’s principal for ultimate distribution to the charitable remainder organization.
More how jazz came up the Mississippi. Commentators on the proposed regulations  recommended that the final regulations provide that Section 1411 not apply to PIFs because doing so would be tantamount to taxing a charity that, ultimately, receives the property after the expiration of the income interest. Specifically, only the PIF's undistributed short-term gains are subject to tax under chapter 1, and those gains are held for ultimate distribution to charity. The commentators stated that the provisions of the Code dealing with charitable organizations, and contributions to them, should be broadly construed in favor of charitable organizations and their donors; thus, Section 1411 shouldn't apply to PIFs. Furthermore, one commentator stated that treating PIFs in a manner significantly different from CRTs is inequitable. The commentator analogized PIFs, operationally, to CRTs. However, the commentator acknowledged that, unlike CRTs, PIFs, by being taxable on undistributed short-term capital gains, don't escape all instances of federal income taxation. The commentators recommended that the final regulations either: (1) provide that a PIF's short-term capital gains be excluded from net investment income, or (2) exclude PIFs from the application of Section 1411 altogether.
The final regulations don't adopt these suggestions. The Treasury recognized that imposing tax on the PIF would reduce the amount of property the charitable remainderman will receive after the expiration of the income interest. However, Section 1411 limits its exclusion to wholly charitable trusts; this group of trusts doesn't include either CRTs or PIFs. While CRTs are excluded from Section 1411 by the express language of Section 664, there's no comparable provision excluding PIFs.
Historical note. To begin with, why are short-term capital gains of pooled income funds taxable? A long, long time ago (1969), in far-out legislative deliberations, Congress was drafting language specifying the requirements for charitable pooled income funds. Some drafters said that those arrangements smelled like mutual funds and should be taxable on all capital gains. Others argued that all capital gains on termination of life interests go to the charity; therefore, they shouldn’t be taxable. "Come on guys," said one of them, "let’s compromise." Thus, it came to pass that short-term capital gains, but not long-term capital gains, are taxable to pooled income funds.

NON-GRANTOR CHARITABLE LEAD TRUSTS
Although not specifically identified, those trusts are subject to the 3.8 percent tax on any net investment income that isn’t distributed to the charitable lead beneficiaries. And remember the low $11,950 threshold for 2013; $12,150 for 2014 (indexed for inflation).

GRANTOR CHARITABLE LEAD TRUSTS
The donor to a grantor trust is taxable on trust income and capital gains, even though paid to the charity. The charitable lead trust itself isn’t subject to the 3.8 percent tax, but a donor will be subject to that tax on any trust net investment income—together with other net investment income—that exceeds the applicable net-investment-income threshold.

ADDITIONAL 0.9 PERCENT MEDICARE TAX
Alert: An individual is liable for the new additional 0.9 percent  Medicare tax if his or her wages, compensation or self-employment income exceed the threshold amount for the individual’s filing status.


Filing Status Threshold Amount
Married filing jointly $250,000
Married filing separately $125,000


Single            $200,000


Head of household (with qualifying person) $200,000
Qualifying widow(er) with dependent child $200,000

Effective. Jan. 1, 2013. The dollar thresholds are established by statute and aren't indexed for inflation.


Additional Medicare tax is not due on all wages, compensation, etc., but just on the wages, compensation, etc. above the threshold for the individual’s filing status
.
Wages that aren't paid in cash, such as fringe benefits, are subject to the 0.9 percent additional Medicare tax.

Reminder. The new 3.8 percent tax imposed on an individual’s net investment income (discussed earlier) isn't applicable to FICA wages or self-employment income.


Posted on 10:10 AM | Categories:

What to do if you don't get your W-2

Kay Bell for Bankrate.com writes: You're still waiting for your W-2. You know you're getting a refund and you want to file your return, but it's something you can't do until you receive your annual wage statement.

The Internal Revenue Service requires employers to get workers their earnings information by the end of each January, so allow a few days after the 31st for it to show up.
But if your Form W-2 never arrives, you can create your own for tax-filing purposes.


Information needed to create a replacement W-2

  • Year's wages.
  • Payroll taxes withheld.
  • Federal and state income taxes withheld.
  • Contributions to your company retirement/401(k) plan.
  • Employer's tax identification number.
Check with Payroll
Before you start work on a replacement W-2, call your company's payroll office. Make sure the payroll administrator has your correct address. If he or she does and the form was just dropped into the mail, you should have it soon.
If it hasn't been sent out yet, you might be able to walk down to the office and pick up your copy in person.

If, however, the days roll by and the form is indeed lost or your employer is inordinately slow in issuing a replacement, or you worked for a company that went out of business and there's no one to bug about getting a W-2, what then?

Don't panic. You can recreate your W-2 on an IRS form and file that instead with your return.


Alert the IRS

First, find your last pay stub. You'll need the information shown there -- wages, Social Security and Medicare taxes paid, federal and, if applicable, state and local taxes withheld, any pension or 401(k) contributions -- to recreate your missing W-2.

The stub also should show the employer information: company name, address and possibly the employer identification number, or EIN. If the EIN isn't on a pay stub and you received a W-2 from the errant employer in prior years, the tax number will be on the old statements. You don't have to have the EIN, but it will help when the IRS processes your return.

Armed with this information, call the IRS at (800) 829-1040 for help in obtaining the missing form. The IRS will use the employment data you gathered -- along with your personal information, such as your Social Security number and dates of employment -- to remind your boss that you need a substitute W-2.


Form 4852

The IRS will send your boss a special form noting that you did not receive your W-2. You'll get a copy of that notice along with a Form 4852, Substitute for Form W-2, Wage and Tax Statement. If, even after nudging from the IRS, your employer doesn't send you a replacement W-2 in time for you to file your tax return, you may file using Form 4852 in place of your missing wage statement.

If you get your official W-2 after filing with the substitute form and its data is different from what you reported on your return, you need to refile. Do this by completing Form 1040X, Amended U.S. Individual Income Tax Return.


Do-it-yourself W-2

If you can't get through to the IRS, you can download Form 4852 from Bankrate's site or the IRS website and fill out the replacement wage statement yourself.

This one-page form, plus a page of instructions, walks you through the W-2 re-creation process. You'll also have to explain how you got the numbers you entered -- generally from old paychecks -- and describe the efforts you made to obtain your missing W-2. If you're missing multiple W-2s, you'll need a separate Form 4852 for each.



After you complete the form, attach it to your tax return in place of your absent W-2. A copy of Form 4852 also should satisfy your state tax collector for those returns. Be aware, though, that using Form 4852 instead of an original W-2 may delay your refund while the IRS verifies the information you provided.

And in cases where an employer has filed for bankruptcy or ceased operations, the IRS suggests you send a copy of Form 4852 to your local Social Security Administration office. The agency's office locator can help you find the one nearest you. This should ensure that you get proper credit for the Social Security and Medicare taxes you paid so that your checks will be correct when it comes time to collect these benefits.

Posted on 10:10 AM | Categories: