Friday, June 6, 2014

Could heterosexual couples use domestic partnerships to avoid marriage tax penalty?

Howard Gleckman for the Christian Science Monitor writes: Some states may have created a way for heterosexual couples to avoid the marriage tax penalty, writes Howard Gleckman. How can domestic partnerships lead toward the federal marriage tax penalty?

In their zeal to provide a legal alternative to banned marriage for same-sex couples, some states may have created a new tax shelter for heterosexual couples. By choosing domestic partnership or civil union over marriage, opposite-sex couples are able to avoid paying a federal income tax marriage penalty, just as same-sex couples can.

Over the past decade, domestic partnerships and civil unions became a popular alternative in many states. Same-sex marriages were broadly prohibited until last year, when the Supreme Court declared key provisions of the Defense of Marriage Act unconstitutional. As of May 22, according to Governing magazine, gay marriage was legal in 19 states and the District of Columbia. But the domestic partnership and civil union laws enacted over the past decade remain on the books in at least a dozen states.
There are vast differences in these state laws. Some make alternatives to marriage available to same-sex couples only. Others permit them for heterosexual couples as well, while others grant the options only to opposite-sex couples who are 62 or over (Social Security has its own marriage penalties for some people who are divorced or married couples getting SSI).
And some states, such as California, require domestic partners to file jointly for state tax purposes even if they file separately on their federal 1040s.
Since the High Court opened the door to gay marriage, my colleague Bob Williams and others have written about the tax consequences for same-sex couples. In general, married couples (of whatever gender) pay a marriage penalty if the spouses make similar incomes. If one spouse earns substantially more than the other, the couple may enjoy a marriage bonus. To see how it works, take a look at TPC’s marriage penalty calculator.
Civil unions and domestic partnerships often make it possible for same-sex couples to enjoy state-level legal benefits of marriage without getting hit by the federal marriage tax penalty. For instance, in most states one partner can inherit property from the other without a will or make medical decisions on a partner’s behalf.
Now, it turns out that opposite-sex domestic partners may be able to enjoy all the same benefits—including the ability to dodge the federal marriage penalty.
There is a flip side, of course. Couples that choose domestic partnership or civil union are barred from filing jointly on their federal return, thus cannot benefit from the marriage bonus. However, unlike same-sex couples, opposite-sex couples can always choose to marry in any state if their financial situation changes.
A number of states have long had domestic partnership laws that covered couples in common-law marriages. But the relatively new statutes that expanded alternatives to traditional marriage made the option much more attractive—and probably more acceptable in some social circles.
In March, the National Conference of State Legislatures did a nice job summarizing the status of those state laws. Here are a few examples:
California: Domestic partnerships are permitted for all same-sex couples and for opposite-sex couples who are 62 and older. Domestic partners have same state rights and responsibilities as married couples.
Colorado: All couples, regardless of gender, may enter into civil unions, which carry the same rights and responsibilities as marriage. Colorado also recognizes civil unions from other states.
Oregon: Domestic partnerships are available for same-sex couples only (though all long-term unmarried couples may enter into private domestic partnership agreements to divide assets in the event of a breakup).
New Jersey: Allows both domestic partnerships and civil unions. Domestic partnerships are available to opposite-sex couples who are age 62 and older.
New Hampshire: Once New Hampshire permitted same-sex marriages, civil unions were automatically converted to marriages.
We’ve known for a while that same-sex couples could choose a self-help solution to the marriage penalty that still allowed them most legal rights of marriage. But in at least some states opposite-sex couples can do the same. I don’t know if enough people will take advantage of this opportunity to create a revenue problem, but it bears watching.
Posted on 7:36 AM | Categories:

TaxJar plans e-filing service for online sales taxes / Fueled by $600,000 in seed funding, the startup automates collection of local taxes related to e-commerce transaction.

Heather Clancy for ZDNet writes: Refueled with $600,000 in funding from several seed investors, startup TaxJar solves an annoying but very real problem for Internet entrepreneurs: how to automate collection of sales taxes related to online transactions, especially on platforms that weren't necessarily set up to accommodate this originally.

That includes both sellers using both widely used e-commerce platforms – Amazon, eBay, Shopify, PayPal, Big Commerce and Etsy --  as well as publishing sites using WordPress where the ability to collect tax isn't native (for selling things such as white papers or reports or such).
Given all the activity related to state sales taxes and possible federal legislation, TaxJar is using its new funds to add new features quickly, including both better ways of automating collection and features for e-filing, said Mark Faggiano, founder of the San Diego-based company. [snip]  The article continues @ ZD Net, click here to continue reading...
Posted on 7:07 AM | Categories:

IRS Says No Bitcoin FBAR Reporting This Tax Season Required

Eric Calouro for NewsBTC writes: The Internal Revenue Service has said that taxpayers need not report bitcoin holdings on FinCEN Form 114 (Report of Foreign Bank and Financial Accounts – also known as FBAR) this tax season.

The news comes from Rod Lunquist, who’s a senior program analyst for the Small Business/Self-Employed Division at the Service, but added that the exception might end in the future as the authority monitors developments in the space.
“At this time, FinCEN has said Bitcoin is not reportable on the FBAR, at least for this filing season,” said Lundquist during a webinar, as first reported by Bloomberg BNA.
In order to remain compliant with tax laws, individuals who hold $10,000 or more in foreign financial accounts are required to use Form 114 and submit that information to FinCEN — the Treasury’s Financial Crimes Enforcement Network.
The Internal Revenue Service continues to monitor the spectacular growth of digital currencies, and earlier this year issued a controversial guidance on the reporting of digital currency for federal tax purposes.
In that guidance, the Service made the following points:
  • Virtual Currency not treated as currency that can generate foreign currency gains/losses
  • Taxpayers are liable for determining the fair market value of their virtual currency
  • Taxpayers must report gains/losses upon exchange from virtual currency to fiat currency, for example
  • Miners must report mined coins at fair market value upon receipt
  • A miner’s income is subject to self-employment tax
  • Virtual currency paid as wages is subject to federal income tax withholding
  • Payments made using virtual currency are subject to information reporting
  • Payments made using virtual currency are subject to backup withholding
  • Taxpayers not in compliance with the notice are subject to penalties
The taxation landscape that surrounds bitcoin and digital currency is ever-changing, and the possibility things will change by next season seems likely.
Posted on 7:05 AM | Categories: