Friday, September 12, 2014

Weighing tax benefits of S corporations

William H Wiersema for Proquest/Insurancenewsnet.com writes: Factors to consider in deciding which type of incorporation is best for you.
AS TAX LAWS continue to evolve, so do choices of entity. Being mindful of the alternatives is critical to achieving tax benefits. Both S corporations and Limited Liability Companies (LLC's) are flow-throughs, which have long been a desirable alternative to regular C corporations.
Unlike in C corporations, the incomes of flow-throughs are taxed directly to their individual owners, largely independent of distributions. C corporations, on the other hand, are double-taxed, incurring their own tax first, without any long-term capital gains break. Then, as money is distributed to owners, it is taxed again at the individual level, without a deduction to the corporation. The law enforces the double tax by limiting owner salaries to reasonable levels, and by preventing corporations from accumulating excess earnings.
However, S corporations have a newly enhanced tax advantage over LLC's. Only active shareholders of S corporations are exempt from the Affordable Care Act's new 3.8% tax on unearned investment income of joint filers making over $250,000. While inactive owners of both entities incur the new tax, highincome active members in LLC's do also, in that a 3.8% Medicare tax applies to their flow-through income.
There are several benefits and risks of becoming and operating as an S corporation. LLC's, on the other hand, feature absence of corporate formalities, unrestricted owner types, flexibility of income allocation and distributions, ability to distribute appreciated assets, and more immediate tax benefits of losses if incurred.
Ultimately, the choice of entity depends heavily on the direction of future tax legislation. The year 2013 saw increases in maximum tax rates for individuals to 43.4% for ordinary income and 23.8% for long-term capital gains and qualifying dividends. Meanwhile, maximum rates for C corporations held firm at 35% on all income. If C corporation rates decline to be more competitive globally, as many in the federal government advocate, flowthrough entities may lose their current appeal. Companies must work with their tax advisors to assure adequate consideration of the unique facts of their situations.
Election and ownership
Switching from a regular C corporation to an S involves a special election, which may have tax costs. Electing S status causes the loss of any credits or carryovers from previous years, and subjects the corporation to "built-in gains" tax at the time of the election, which includes adjustments of property to market value. If sold within a period of ten years after the election, S corporations may be open to double taxation.
The advantages of S corporations in taxes come with many restrictions, violation of which can result in termination of S status and loss of its tax benefits. The number of shareholders is limited to 100. Ownership is restricted to individuals, estates, certain trusts, and certain exempt organizations.
Corporations, partnerships, and nonresident aliens are ineligible. An S corporation cannot be an owned subsidiary of a C corporation or a multiple member LLC, but can be a 100%-owned subsidiary of another S corporation.
Transfer or sale of stock can have severe consequences. If a shareholder is an LLC with more than a single member, the S election terminates. It is advisable to have a shareholder agreement in place to provide a right of first refusal, in the event that stock is offered for sale to nonqualifying shareholders.
Moreover, only a single class of stock is allowed. For example, preferred shares may not be issued. A potential problem arises with undocumented shareholder debt. If upon audit, the Internal Revenue Service interprets the debt as a second class of stock, the S election terminates. On another note, voting right differences do not constitute separate classes of stock.
Choice of tax year-end is restricted. The concern is that shareholders could otherwise benefit from cash-basis timing differences. Selecting a year-end other than Dec. 31 requires that sufficient funds be kept on deposit with the U.S. Treasury to offset any timing benefit.
Taxation and compliance
Once operating as an S corporation, taxation takes place at the owner level from amounts reported on the schedule K-l from the form 1120-S. Unlike C corporations, dividend distributions are not taxed unless they exceed the shareholder's cumulative basis. The basis is the amount paid for the stock plus amounts lent to the company plus the pro rata share of the accumulated adjustments account, which is basically the equivalent of retained earnings while the entity is an S corporation. A shareholder's guarantee of debt does not constitute basis.
Additionally, unlike C corporations, losses may provide tax benefits for owners. The deductibility of losses for active shareholders, however, is limited to the basis in the stock. Losses in excess of basis must be carried forward.
Compensation of stockholders who are active in the business must not be unreasonably low or distributions unreasonably high. The reason is that these shareholders might evade payroll taxes by making non-taxable distributions instead. Some tax practitioners advise clients to apply a minimum benchmark of the FICA base, which is $117,000 in 2014.
Distributions are heavily restricted. In accordance with the formalities of having a single class of stock, distributions must be paid in proportion to ownership. Also, distributions must be made to the actual shareholders. For example, if a trust owns the stock and distributions are paid directly to beneficiaries, it might cause the Internal Revenue Service not to respect the existence of the trusts.
Moreover, distributions in excess of basis are taxed as capital gains. S corporations having C corporation earnings and profits face additional potential taxes. If paid out of C corporation earnings and profits, excess distributions are taxed at ordinary dividend rates. Passive investment income in excess of 25% of gross receipts is taxed at the highest C corporation tax rate. Continuing the excess for three years can cause the S election to terminate.
Fringe benefits
While shareholders of regular C corporations participate in tax-favored fringe benefits alongside their employees, their counterparts in S corporations are limited. Shareholders owning more than two percent of an S corporation are considered to be self-employed for purposes of many of the rules. They may not participate in certain programs, including cafeteria plans and flexible spending accounts. Other financial benefits, such as medical or education, are deducted by the company and taxed to the shareholder in year-end payroll reporting. The medical insurance portion of compensation is exempt from social security, Medicare, or unemployment taxes. Medical insurance premiums are deductible by shareholders as selfemployed medical expense on their personal income tax returns.
On the other hand, life insurance premiums are fully taxable to shareholders, without a personal tax deduction. There may be good reasons to carry life insurance outside of the business. If it is used to fund corporate buy-sell agreements among shareholders, proceeds from policies that are normally exempt from taxes for beneficiaries may be taxed at maximum rates under transfer of value rules. A separate partnership might be preferred to avoid the issue, while also retaining the benefit of increased equity interest basis brought about by individual surviving owners doing a cross-purchase.
S corporation considerations
Summarized here are the critical aspects of S corporations. Failure to comply with restrictions on ownership, distributions, or passive investment income could result in termination of S status. This means the S corporation reverts to a C corporation, and the benefits, including the single level of taxation, are immediately lost.
Election and ownership
* Electing S status may cause loss of certain tax benefits, including credits and carryovers from previous years.
* A sale may be double-taxed within ten years of making the S election.
* Number of shareholders may not exceed 100.
* Shareholders must be individuals, estates, certain trusts, or certain exempt organizations.
* Shareholders may not be corporations, partnerships, or non-resident aliens. The only exception is 100% ownership by another S corporation.
* Only a single class of stock is allowed, although voting right differences do not constitute separate classes of stock.
Taxation and compliance
* S corporation income flows through to its shareholders, who report their share on their individual income tax returns.
* S corporation losses are deductible only up to the basis in the stock.
* Distributions up to basis are not taxed.
* Shareholder compensation must not be unreasonably low, or distributions unreasonably high.
* Distributions must be proportioned to ownership.
* If entities are shareholders, distributions must be to those entities, not direct to beneficiaries.
* Distributions become taxable if paid in excess of cumulative undistributed income or out of prior C corporation accumulated earnings.
* Passive income must be within limits or risk termination.
2% shareholder fringe benefits
* Shareholders may not participate in certain programs, such as cafeteria plans and flexible spending accounts.
* Medical insurance and most other benefits are deducted by the S corporation as compensation and taxed to shareholders.
* Life insurance premiums are taxed to shareholders without an S corporation deduction.
* Life insurance proceeds from policies held within the S corporation risk taxation at maximum rates under transfer of value rules.
Posted on 11:09 AM | Categories:

MYOB and Xero locked in a bitter cloud war / Both in the red, investing heavily to knock the other out.

William Maher for CRN writes:  MYOB has doubled the number of paying cloud users as it continues to battle Xero in a fight for the accounting market. The race currently sees MYOB reporting much higher revenue and a larger overall user base while Xero holds a big lead in terms of cloud users. While MYOB has a smaller cloud user base, cloud adoption is growing significantly, as is revenue.

The company reported a record result in its half-yearly financial report, with revenue for the six months to 30 June growing by $23.7 million, or 21 percent, to reach $140 million.
Earnings before interest, tax, depreciation and amortisation increased by more than $15 million to $69.7 million, a 29 percent boost. MYOB made a net loss after tax of $5.6 million, compared with a loss of $6.3 million the same half the previous year.

More MYOB customers are choosing cloud services than before - there were 86,000 paying customers using cloud files at June 30 this year, which was double the number recorded a year earlier.

Of new MYOB SME product registrations in June, 63 percent were for cloud products, compared with 36 percent a year ago. Recurring revenue now accounts for 93 percent of total revenue at MYOB.

MYOB lays claim to an overall customer base of 1.2 million businesses. The company also boasts a partner network of more than 40,000 accountants.

The company has been investing heavily in staff and R&D. It reported an 11 percent increase in operating expenses to $59.7 million to fund strategic growth initiatives. More than 100 staff were added in the last 12 months and MYOB plans to spend more than $40 million on R&D this financial year.

In early 2015, MYOB plans to launch MYOB Advanced, a cloud-based "business management system" for larger enterprises. This will complement its MYOB EXO and MYOB PayGlobal products for medium and larger businesses.

Meanwhile Xero may not have the same size revenue but is well ahead in the number of cloud users. Compared with MYOB's 86,000 paying customers using cloud files at June 30, Xero reported 284,000 customers at the end of March 2014 - these would all be cloud users, as Xero is delivered as a SaaS product. This number is growing significantly - up from 157,000 paying customers in 2013.
MYOB's financial reporting follows the calendar year and the company has not released full-year results that can be directly compared over the same time period with those of Xero. However, in Xero's full year results announced in May, the company reported revenues of NZ$70.1 million (AU$62.3 million), up by 83 percent from NZ$38.4 million the year before.

Xero reported a net loss after tax of NZ$35.5 million (AU$31.6 million) for the financial year ended 31 March 2014, compared to NZ$14.4 million the year before.

Like MYOB, the company is investing heavily for future growth, spending NZ$55.1 million on sales and marketing costs and adding 376 employees in the 2014 financial year. 
Posted on 9:48 AM | Categories:

Xero shares drop 5.3% as US boss Peter Karpas quits / Shares fall as top US exec quits Xero

for the National Business Review writes: Peter Karpas, Xero's [NZX: XRO] North America chief executive, quit just six months after joining, as the cloud-based accounting software company reassesses its US growth plans, said chief executive Rod Drury. The shares fell.

Karpas, former PayPal vice president and general manager of North America small and medium business, joined Xero as its North American head in late February this year. The Wellington-based company wants a million customers, and is targeting growth in the US market where it sees the potential to take market share of an estimate 29 million small to medium sized business owners.

"Peter came on and really helped us get our US strategy right so we understand that strategy, but the role moving forward wasn't really suited to his skills so we mutually agreed to move forward," Drury told BusinessDesk. "As we worked with Peter to establish our model he was kind of like 'hey I'm probably not the right guy for this right now' and maybe we were a year or two too early for his strategic stuff.

"It's important that if we see things aren't working out or are different, we change the strategy and have the courage to rip the bandaid off and to build the right long-term team," Drury said.
Shares of Xero were down

6.79%  percent to near-month low of $21.75 and have fallen some 51 percent since its intraday record of $45.99 in early March, in part due to a global selloff as investors began to question high valuations relative to earnings of tech companies.

The company's US growth plans have come under close scrutiny. Last month Deutsche Bank, the investment bank which part owns Craigs Investment Partners in New Zealand, initiated coverage of Xero, rating the stock a 'sell' and giving it a target share price of $18.90.

In the August note "Too much blue sky baked in" Deutsche analysts Stephen Ridgewell and Joshua Dale said the "market is pricing in a faster ramp up in US sales than is likely and that the share price is likely to de-rate" to $18.90 on a discounted cash flow basis. The company needs two to three more years to build its growth engine in the US, they said.

The US market is different to Xero's experience in New Zealand, Australia and the UK, and success will take longer, Drury said. The litigious nature of the US meant accountants didn't readily recommend software to customers, which had been part of Xero's sale strategy in other markets.

"The US accounting industry is a long way behind on cloud they haven't had a lot of innovation in the market and they're much more compliance focused," Drury said. "The US is going to be larger than we thought but it will take a few years."

The company also faces aggressive competition from incumbent Intuit, which runs QuickBooks. In July, Drury told shareholders at the annual general meeting in Wellington that everything Intuit did was now in response to Xero, and conversion of its 5 million desktop customers to the cloud wouldn't work. However some analysts have questioned whether the company has just shown its competitor what it needs to do to keep market share.

Drury said he expects the US market to accelerate over the next two years and the company would be making a number of key appointments over the coming three months.

According to Drury's AGM presentation, the company has 334,000 customers worldwide, two-thirds of which were in Australia and New Zealand, and 18,000 in North America. In August, it passed US$100 million in annualised committed monthly revenue, and expects subscription revenue growth to be about 80 percent.

Xero's stock surged late last year, when the company raised $180 million in October to fund US growth plans. The escrow period for those investors is coming to a close.


TOM PULLAR-STRECKER for BusinessDay writes:

Shares fall as top US exec quits Xero

Xero shares have fallen 5.5 per cent after the company announced the executive charged with overseeing its drive into the United States had stepped down after just seven months.
Xero appointed former PayPal vice-president Peter Karpas to head its business in North America in February. 

But Xero founder Rod Drury said this morning they had mutually agreed he was not the right person to take the business forward after a change in Xero's sales strategy there.
Drury returned from a visit to the US on Sunday. 

"What we have seen is the US accounting industry is quite a lot more conservative than our other markets," Drury said. 

Xero would concentrate on selling its software direct to small businesses and through partnerships, such as the one it signed with tax-compliance giant H&R Block in April, until the accounting sector caught up, he said. 

Drury said that meant the company needed a local leader with a different set of skills. The parting was amicable and he remained a huge fan of Karpas, he said. "We are really pleased with his maturity in saying 'I am not the right guy for this'." 

Xero said chief financial officer Ross Jenkins would fill the role until the company found a permanent replacement. 

Xero shares were trading down $1.26 at $21.70 in late-morning trading after the announcement. 

Drury acknowledged some investors might be nervous about the management change.
But it was "better in the early stage to get things right, build the best team and take that on the chin", he said. 

Xero's annualised monthly sales had now topped US$100 million (NZ$122m) and were growing at an annual rate of 80 per cent, which put it "best in class" in the global cloud-software market, Drury said. 

That was helping it attract top talent, he said. 

"You will see a number of new appointments as we build our go-to-market team for the US for 2015 and 2016." 

Karpas agreed to a short interview with Fairfax Media when he visited Xero's Wellington headquarters in March. But he said then it was too early to outline his plan of attack for the US market. 

Influential US accountant Michelle Long, who contracts to Xero's US rival, Intuit, but who had also flirted with Xero last year, said in July that she believed Xero had lost momentum in the US market. 

Her comments were backed by Woodward Partners analyst Nick Lewis but angrily rejected by Drury at the company's annual meeting that month. 

Xero last reported in March that it had 18,000 customers in North America which at the time represented about 6 per cent of its customer base. 

Drury said he did not think that market would take off for another year or two, during which time its main growth would be in Australia and Britain. 

The company said on Wednesday that its global work force had reached 900. It opened a new office in Parnell, Auckland, where Drury said it intended to take on a further 60 staff by June.
New Zealand managing director Victoria Crone said 80 New Zealand companies had developed add-ons to Xero's online accounting software and she estimated they together employed at least 1000 staff. 

 New Zealand Herald writes: Xero shares drop as US boss quits
Peter Karpas, Xero's North America chief executive, quit just six months after joining, as the cloud-based accounting software company reassesses its US growth plans, said chief executive Rod Drury. The shares fell.

Karpas, former PayPal vice president and general manager of North America small and medium business, joined Xero as its North American head in late February this year. The Wellington-based company wants a million customers, and is targeting growth in the US market where it sees the potential to take market share of an estimate 29 million small to medium sized business owners.

"Peter came on and really helped us get our US strategy right so we understand that strategy, but the role moving forward wasn't really suited to his skills so we mutually agreed to move forward," Drury told BusinessDesk. "As we worked with Peter to establish our model he was kind of like 'hey I'm probably not the right guy for this right now' and maybe we were a year or two too early for his strategic stuff.

"It's important that if we see things aren't working out or are different, we change the strategy and have the courage to rip the bandaid off and to build the right long-term team," Drury said.

Shares of Xero fell 5.3 percent to near-month low of $21.75 at 11am this morning and have fallen some 51 per cent since its intraday record of $45.99 in early March, in part due to a global selloff as investors began to question high valuations relative to earnings of tech companies.

The company's US growth plans have come under close scrutiny. Last month Deutsche Bank, the investment bank which part owns Craigs Investment Partners in New Zealand, initiated coverage of Xero, rating the stock a 'sell' and giving it a target share price of $18.90.

In the August note "Too much blue sky baked in" Deutsche analysts Stephen Ridgewell and Joshua Dale said the "market is pricing in a faster ramp up in US sales than is likely and that the share price is likely to de-rate" to $18.90 on a discounted cash flow basis. The company needs two to three more years to build its growth engine in the US, they said.

The US market is different to Xero's experience in New Zealand, Australia and the UK, and success will take longer, Drury said. The litigious nature of the US meant accountants didn't readily recommend software to customers, which had been part of Xero's sale strategy in other markets.

"The US accounting industry is a long way behind on cloud they haven't had a lot of innovation in the market and they're much more compliance focused," Drury said. "The US is going to be larger than we thought but it will take a few years."

The company also faces aggressive competition from incumbent Intuit, which runs QuickBooks. In July, Drury told shareholders at the annual general meeting in Wellington that everything Intuit did was now in response to Xero, and conversion of its 5 million desktop customers to the cloud wouldn't work. However some analysts have questioned whether the company has just shown its competitor what it needs to do to keep market share.
Drury said he expects the US market to accelerate over the next two years and the company would be making a number of key appointments over the coming three months.

According to Drury's AGM presentation, the company has 334,000 customers worldwide, two-thirds of which were in Australia and New Zealand, and 18,000 in North America. In August, it passed US$100 million in annualised committed monthly revenue, and expects subscription revenue growth to be about 80 percent.

Xero's stock surged late last year, when the company raised $180 million in October to fund US growth plans. The escrow period for those investors is coming to a close.



Posted on 6:19 AM | Categories: