Tuesday, December 17, 2013

IRS issues final regs on implementation of Medicare tax

The IRS has issued final regulations relating to the additional Medicare tax imposed on income above certain threshold amounts, as added by the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act and the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act of 2010. The final regulations provide guidance for employers and individuals relating to the implementation of the additional Medicare tax, including the requirement to withhold additional Medicare tax on certain wages and compensation, the requirement to file a return reporting additional Medicare tax, the employer process for adjusting underpayments and overpayments of additional Medicare tax, and the employer and individual processes for filing a claim for refund for an overpayment of additional Medicare tax.

The IRS issued proposed regulations on the additional Medicare tax on December 3, 2012, and issued corrections to the proposed regulations on January 30, 2013. The final regulations generally follow the proposed regulations. In response to one comment received, the final regulations provide for adjustment by an employer of overpaid additional Medicare tax withheld from employees in the calendar year in which the wages or compensation were paid.

This tax applies to individuals' wages and compensation, as well as self-employment income, above a threshold amount received after December 31, 2012. Employers must begin withholding the tax on wages it pays an employee in excess of $200,000 in a calendar year, beginning January 1, 2013. The tax rate is 0.9 percent. The tax will be calculated and reported on the individual's tax return. All wages in excess of the applicable threshold amount subject to Medicare tax are subject to the additional Medicare tax. The same is true of Railroad Retirement Tax Act (RRTA) compensation. Threshold amounts are $250,000 (married filing jointly), $125,000 (married filing separately), and $200,000 (single, head of household, qualifying widow(er) with dependent child).

The final regulations on the tax rate and threshold amounts, with respect to both income and self-employment tax, are effective for quarters beginning on or after November 29, 2013. Taxpayers may rely on rules contained in the proposed regulations for quarters beginning prior to that date. With respect to returns to be filed by taxpayers, the regulations are effective for tax years beginning on or after November 29, 2013. With respect to adjustments to underpayments, as well as to repayment of tax erroneously collected from the employee, the regulations apply to adjusted returns filed on or after November 29, 2013. Taxpayers may rely on rules contained in the proposed regulations for adjusted returns filed before that date. The regulations apply to refund claims filed on or after November 29, 2013. (78 FR 71,468, November 29, 2013.)
Posted on 3:02 PM | Categories:

Thomson Sells Tax Prep, Outsourcing Businesses to Ernst & Young Deal Value Not Disclosed; 175 Employees to Join E&Y

Ben Fox Rubin for the Wall St Journal writes: Thomson Reuters Corp. TRI.T +0.18% sold its tax preparation and court accounting outsourcing businesses to accounting firm Ernst & Young, a move that comes as the data provider has worked to cut costs and re-evaluate its businesses.

"We are focused on delivering value to our customers and believe we can best execute through our software platform," said Brian Peccarelli, president of Thomson Reuters's tax and accounting business. "We have determined that an accounting and consulting organization like EY can better serve our customers' full-service outsourced tax preparation needs."
He said the company will continue to work closely with Ernst & Young.
About 175 employees will join Ernst & Young. The deal value wasn't disclosed.
Ernst & Young said the acquisition will help it to continue growing its outsourcing businesses, as it looks to expand its offerings to financial services organization and law firms.
Thomson Reuters's tax and accounting business will focus its resources on its core software and implementation services businesses. The software businesses of Onesource Trust Tax and Onesource Trust & Estate Administration will remain with Thomson Reuters's tax and accounting business.
Thomson Reuters's financial and risk division has suffered in recent years as big bank clients reduced head count. The company's Eikon financial desktop platform, launched in the wake of the financial crisis, has only recently shown signs of growth.
In October, the company said it would undergo a fresh review of its businesses, after it already had taken some steps to cut costs this year, launching plans to eliminate 2,500 jobs from its core financial and risk division in February.
Thomson Reuters competes with News Corp unit Dow Jones & Co., publisher of The Wall Street Journal and Dow Jones Newswires on business news.
Posted on 9:33 AM | Categories:

Tax Implications for Bloggers

Lynn Stalhvorth, CPA,  & Susan Anderson, CPA, CFP,  for TMC Net write:The popularity and profitability of personal blogs continue to increase with the availability of easy-to-use social media tools, such as Twitter, LiveJoumal, and Tumblr, as well as the shift of more advertising dollars to these blogs. The term "blog" is a contraction of the term "web log." Information or commentary is posted to a blog in discrete entries and presented in chronological order, newest entries first. Blogging's popularity has steadily increased since the late 1990s. Many personal blogs are written solely for their own sake and earn less than $100 annually. While it is impossible to know the total amount of revenue generated by personal blogs, it is estimated that only about 10% of these blogs earn more than $100,000 annually. Approximately 150 million people post to their personal blogs regularly. Chances are that some of these individuals can be found among a tax preparer's clients. This article offers guidance to CPAs who provide tax and business advice to bloggers, large or small, by explaining the relevant tax provisions.

The pitfalls awaiting bloggers who do not think of themselves as business owners present opportunities for CPAs, as suggested by this blogger: I opened an LLC earlier this year. I'm lost with keeping up with all the expenses-money coming in and going out. Some items were paid with my personal account and others with my business account and I have income being deposited to PayPal! Many CPAs might be unfamiliar with personal blogs. Exhibit 1 presents a glossary of commonly used blogging terms. The first personal blogs, such as http://www.peterme.com, were generally online diaries. While the online journal genre of personal blogging is still around, many blogs now focus on a particular subject, such as politics (http:// www.cagle.com), food (http://www. aspicyperspective.com), exercise (http:// www.irunfar.com), personal finance (http://www.moolanomy.com), home improvement and decorating (http://www. digsdigs.com), fashion (http://www. manrepeller.com), travel (http://youngadventuress.com), or sports (http://www. mlbtraderumors.com). In terms of legal structure, most blogs are either de facto sole proprietorships or organized as LLCs.

Personal bloggers are often unaware that they may face any tax issues. Consider the following example: Katherine works in retail and has a personal blog on which she writes about regional travel. She and a friend recently spent a long weekend at a spa in the mountains a few hours away. Katherine plans to write on her personal blog about her spa experience. The spa provided her and her friend several free services and meals. The friends took a day trip to try zip lining and dined at a well-known area restaurant. Katherine has not yet decided whether she will blog about the zip lining; she had planned to review the restaurant on her blog, but the meal was unimpressive, so she changed her mind.


What are Katherine's taxable income and deductible expenses with regard to this trip? Katherine has no idea, and is not even aware that she needs to consider including any of these items on her tax return. Answering these types of questions for taxpayers requires considering whether a blog is a business, and what its revenues and expenses are.

Business or Hobby? As bloggers move into business activities, they would certainly benefit from tax planning and business advice. In anticipation of growth, issues such as deciding how to organize the business and the need to separate living space from office space in order to deduct home office expenses need to be addressed. Bloggers who do not think of themselves as small business owners might not realize that they need to file estimated quarterly tax payments or include income from companies that did not send them a Form 1099. While some bloggers might bristle at the idea that their personal blog is a business, they will likely welcome this guidance. And as CPAs become more familiar with the business aspects of blogging, they will likely recognize the potential for new service opportunities.

The most important consideration in determining the tax consequences of a blog is whether the blog is considered a hobby or business. Exhibit 2 lists the factors that the 1RS considers in classifying an activity as a business or hobby. The intent to make a profit is a crucial factor for the blog to be considered a business. Because many blogs are not started with this intention, but rather evolve into income-generating entities over time, CPAs can help address and overcome the profit-motive hurdle. Blogs that do not generate a profit for three or more years during a five-year period are presumed to not be profit motivated; therefore, they are subject to the hobby loss limitation (Internal Revenue Code [IRC] section 183 [d]). Even if a blog does not have the requisite three years of profits, CPAs can help a blogger demonstrate that the blog is a trade or business. It is important for a blogger to manage all blog-related activities as professionally as possible in order to be considered a business.

If the blog is a considered a hobby, its expenses are deductible only to the extent of its income (IRC section 183 [b] [2]). Hobby expenses are deductible in the following order: 1) interest and taxes related to the hobby (e.g., real property taxes and home mortgage interest that are otherwise deductible); 2) ordinary and necessary hobby expenses, excluding depreciation; and 3) depreciation (Treasury Regulations section 1.183-l[b][l]). Qualifying expenses in the last two categories are also subject to the 2% of adjusted gross income (AGI) floor on miscellaneous itemized deductions (IRC section 67[a]). In contrast, if a blog qualifies as a business, blogging expenses in excess of income can be deducted without limitation.

Blogging Revenues Starting a personal blog can be easy and inexpensive: pick a name; choose one of the various free blogging hosts (or platforms), such as Blogger, WordPress, or Posterous; and start writing. Posting high-quality content and developing loyal readers increase traffic to a blog. At this point, it may be pos sible for this casual hobby to generate an income stream. Many personal bloggers can earn at least small amounts of revenue by hosting some type of advertisement. Personal blogs that host ads are considered "monetized." If the decision is made to monetize, bloggers will have taxable income that needs to be reported, along with documentation of the costs incurred in connection with their blogs.

Monetization of a personal blog can take many forms. Although some sources of blogging revenues are similar to other types of income earned by freelancers or small businesses-for example, consulting or speaking engagements, offering workshops, or selling the business-others are unique to the blogosphere. One of the easiest ways for a blog to earn revenue is to join an advertising program, such as Google's AdSense or Chitika. These programs work by posting ads for products that might interest the blog's readers and then paying the blogger when readers click on the ads.

Another simple way for blogs to generate revenue is through affiliate marketing. Several of the more popular affiliate marketing programs are Link Share, Google's Affiliate Network, and Amazon Associates. Most of these programs are pay-per-sale. If a parenting blogger becomes an Amazon Associate, for example, and includes links to childcare books, strollers, or child-proofing gadgets in the text of a blog entry, the blogger is paid if a reader clicks on the link and buys any of those products from Amazon. Bloggers can also solicit businesses to advertise directly on the site. For example, a regional travel blog could collect fees for hosting ads for area restaurants, inns, and attractions. Offering online or virtual courses, selling e-books, installing donation buttons or "tip jars" and accepting products or services to review are other sources of blogging revenue.

Bloggers should be advised to track these revenues on a monthly basis. They may not realize they will only receive Form 1099s from companies from whom they earn over $600 annually, or that compensation in a form other than cash still represents taxable revenue. In response to recent posts to blogging communities about tax questions, these questions from bloggers drive home the point: I think a lot of people accept free food and products and don't think about that as income. I'd like to hear some discussion on minimum thresholds, too, i.e. you have to make X dollars before you have to claim it on taxes.

If a gift card is given instead of payment, how does that counts towards taxes? Not sure if a company would send a W-2 or not.

It is common practice for advertisers to deposit earnings directly into a blogger's PayPal account. These earnings must be reported as income in the year in which they are constructively received (Treasury Regulations section 1.451-1 [a]), so bloggers should be advised that those earnings are effectively received when deposited, regardless of when they are withdrawn, and note that there is generally a lag between the month in which advertising revenues are earned and that in which they are received.

Bloggers are often compensated in goods and services. For example, a home improvement blogger may receive free copies of decorating books or tools to review. A wine blogger may receive free bottles, complimentary wine tastings, or even trips to visit vineyards. Bloggers who speak at conferences are frequently compensated with conference fees and travel costs in lieu of fees for speaking. When meals, accommodations, and products are received as compensation, bloggers should be advised that the fair value of these items must be included in income (Treasury Regulations section 1.61-1 [a]).

Blogging Expenses Identifying and tracking deductible expenses is an area in which bloggers particularly need guidance, as suggested by the following quotes: I need to know the basics. Been blogging over a year, what should I have been doing or start doing now? Keep all my receipts? Keep a spreadsheet of all my expenses? Can I deduct these expenses? Do you have to have a business to deduct the blog expenses on your taxes? Whaf s the best way to handle groceries [for a food blogger] in terms of separating out what's for business versus personal, and how should we document their usage? Other questions also arise: How much, if any, of her grocery bill can a food blogger deduct if she is developing and posting recipes? Can a sports blogger deduct the costs of season tickets and travel incurred to attend out-of-town basketball games? Can a fitness blogger deduct gym membership fees? Blogging conferences, such as Blog World and Bloggy Boot Camp, are a great way to hone skills and gain exposure for a blog, but they come with conference fees, travel expenses, and dues for professional organizations. What, if any, costs of attending such conferences are deductible? Initially, bloggers might incur costs for professional webpage and logo design, trademark development and registration, advertising, prizes, business cards, head shots and letterhead. While it is possible to start a blog without incurring any costs, many personal bloggers choose to register their domain names with a registrar (e.g., http://www.GoDaddy.com) for an annual fee. A blog that owns its domain can be distinguished from one that does not by the absence of the blog host's name in the blog's web address. For example, http://www.anothermarvelousmeal.blogspot .com is the web address for a personal blog hosted by Blogger, for which the author does not own the domain, whereashttp://www.anothermarvelousmeal.com is the address for the same blog with a registered domain name. Registration of a domain name makes the blog easier to find because the web address is usually the same as the name of the blog. Registering the domain name gives ownership of the name to the blogger and allows for flexibility to move between hosting platforms.

Recurring costs for bloggers include expenses for blog- and photo-hosting sites, cloud access, search engine optimization, and other types of consulting. Bloggers incur typical business expenses, such as office supplies, mailing expenses, legal and accounting services, word processing, and other types of software. A computer and peripheral equipment, such as a printer, are necessary expenditures. Images are an important component of most types of blogs, so a digital camera, photo editing software, lighting, and other related equipment are generally needed. Many blogs are written from home, so a deduction for home office expenses is also a possibility. While it is relatively easy to track and determine the amount deductible for tax purposes for some of these expenses, the deductibility of other items is mysterious to many bloggers, assuming that they even realize a deduction is possible.

In order for an expense to be deductible, it must originate in an income-producing activity (U.S. v. Gilmore, 372 US 39 [1963]). Bloggers can deduct ordinary and necessary expenses incurred in the production of income (IRC section 212[1]). The definition of "ordinary and necessary" differs depending upon the subject matter of the blog. The courts consider the facts of each case when determining whether an expense is ordinary and necessary. Although workout costs are usually personal and not deductible, off-season physical conditioning costs were determined to be ordinary and necessary business expenses for a professional hockey player (Stemkowski v. Comm 'r, 690 F2d 40, 1982-2 USTC para. 9,589 [2d Cir.]) and may be considered such for a fitness blogger if the workouts are the basis for blog posts and the blog qualifies as a trade or business.

Similar guidance exists for entertainment: the regulations contain an objective test for classifying these costs (Treasury Regulations section 1. 274-2[b][ii]). For example, attendance at the theater by a theater critic is not entertainment, but workrelated. A sports blogger's season tickets are deductible as well. A food blogger can deduct the costs of food purchased to test a recipe, but must reduce the deduction by 50% (IRC section 274[n][l]). Transportation costs (e.g., air travel) are deductible if the majority of the time on the trip is related to the blogging activity (Treasury Regulations section 1.1622[b][l]). All of these bloggers can deduct blogging conference fees, as well as 50% of the cost of meals and lodging during the conference. If bloggers receive complementary registration and accommodations at a conference in exchange for speaking, the fair market value of these items would both be included in income and potentially deductible as an expense, subject to the hobby limitations if the blog is not a trade or business. Similarly, if a blogger receives complimentary merchandise from a manufacturer to review or use as a prize in a contest, the fair market value of the merchandise is both includible in income and deductible as an expense, subject to limitations.

If a blog is classified for tax purposes as a business, a blogger can elect under IRC section 179 to expense equipment such as computers and cell phones. For 2013, the maximum deduction is $500,000 (IRC section 179[b][l][B]). Most bloggers will be subject to the provision limiting the deduction to the blog's taxable income (IRC section 179[b][3][A]). The IRC section 179 deduction is not available for hobbies, so blogs classified as hobbies for tax purposes must depreciate these assets over their class lives. Computers and peripheral equipment are classified as five-year Modified Accelerated Cost Recovery System (MACRS) property (IRC section 168[e][3][B]), whereas cameras and cell phones have a class life of seven years (IRC section 168[e][3][C][v][II]). In order to depreciate computers, cameras, and peripheral equipment (e.g., "listed property"), the blogger must keep logs showing the amount of time the property is used for blogging versus personal purposes (Treasury Regulations section 1. 2745T[6][c]).

Depreciation deductions are prorated based upon the percentage of blogging use. In the case of listed property used for blogging, less than 50% of the total use must be depreciated under the alternative depreciation system (ADS) under IRC section 280F(b)(l). The ADS uses the straight-line method and does not permit bonus depreciation (IRC section 168[k][2][D][i][II]). If listed property was previously depreciated under MACRS and the business use drops to 50% or less, the excess depreciation deduction (including excess IRC section 179 deductions) must be recaptured as gross income (IRC sections 280F[b][2] and 179[d][10]; Treasury Regulations section 1.179-1 [e]). Over-the-counter computer software is amortized over 36 months beginning with the month in which the software is placed in service (Revenue Procedure 2000-50).

For a blogger to deduct home office expenses, a portion of the home must be used exclusively on a regular basis as- * a principal place of business for any trade or business of the taxpayer, or * a place of business that is used by patients, clients, or customers in meeting or dealing with a taxpayer's trade or business (IRC section 280A[c]).

The "exclusive use" requirement means that the portion of the home must be used solely for the blogging activity. For example, a food blogger will not be able to deduct costs associated with his home's kitchen, because it is also used to prepare meals for personal consumption. A principal place of business is an office used by the taxpayer to conduct administrative or management activities pertaining to the trade or business, when there is no fixed other location of the trade or business where the taxpayer conducts substantial administrative or management activities (IRC section 280A[c][l]). For example, if a sports blogger has a room with a computer and television that are used only for her blogging activities, the room would qualify as a home office. If the blogger obtains Internet access through a telephone company, the cost is not deductible, unless there is a separate line devoted to the blogging activity and not used for other purposes. If Internet access is through a cable provider, the cost is not deductible if used for personal purposes in addition to blogging.

The deduction for home office expenses is limited to the income from the blogging business, reduced by the allocable portion of otherwise deductible interest and taxes, and any expenses not related to the use of the home, such as advertising, supplies, and incidentals (IRC section 280A[c][5]). In determining the amount of expenses to allocate to the home office, taxpayers typically use the ratio of the square footage of the home office to the total square footage of the home.

In January 2013, however, the 1RS issued Revenue Procedure 2013-13, which provides an optional safe harbor for calculating the amount of deductible expenses attributable to the business use of a personal residence. This safe harbor, effective for tax years beginning after December 31, 2012, allows taxpayers to deduct $5 per square foot for home office expenses, up to a maximum of 300 square feet. This amount represents all expenses pertaining to the home office, except for otherwise deductible interest and taxes. The safe harbor election is made annually, but once it is chosen for a particular year, it is irrevocable. Depreciation on the home office is not deductible in years in which the safe harbor is elected. If, in subsequent years, the actual expense method is used, the home office must be depreciated under ADS.

It is critical that bloggers maintain adequate substantiation for all deductions. This documentation should include the amount, date, time, place, and business purpose for the expenditure. If the expense is for entertainment, the substantiation should also include the business relationship to the person being entertained (IRC section 274[d]).

Opportunities Serving bloggers is a great opportunity for tax advisors to expand their practices. As blogs continue to proliferate, tax professionals will increasingly be asked questions related to the specific issues that bloggers face. For many bloggers, these questions may involve relatively small amounts of money. Few blogs become "overnight successes," and it is hard to predict which will become big money makers. But at any time, the right sort of recognition-an award, a post that goes viral, a mention in a national newspaper story-can have a huge impact on a blog's popularity and profitability, turning a relatively small income stream into a much larger one. More commonly, blogs may become successful enough over time to provide a substantial second income. Bloggers and their CPAs need to understand the unique tax issues before the activity becomes lucrative. CPAs can start by advising clients who blog on the importance of establishing good record keeping from the outset. ? Personal bloggers are often unaware that they may face any tax issues.

If a blogger receives complimentary merchandise to review or use as a prize In a contest, the fair market value is both includible in income and deductible as an expense, subject to limitations.

Lynn Stalhvorth, CPA, is an associate professor of accounting at Appalachian State University, Boone, N.C. She also publishes a food blog at http://www.Carolina bonvivant.com. Susan Anderson, CPA, CFP, is a professor of accounting, also at Appalachian State University.
Posted on 9:29 AM | Categories:

Business Standard Mileage Rate Drops For 2014

The optional business standard mileage rate will decrease from 56.5 cents-per-mile for 2013 to 56 cents-per-mile for 2014, the IRS has announced (IRS News Release IR-2013-95Notice 2013-80, 2013-52 IRB __). The optional standard mileage rate for qualified medical and moving expenses will also decrease for 2014. The rate for charitable miles driven is set by statute and remains unchanged for 2014.

Comment
"No one was surprised that the optional standard mileage rate decreased. Oil prices have held relatively steady the past few months which in turn affects the price of gas," Cindy Hockenberry, EA, Manager, Tax Knowledge Center, National Association of Tax Professionals (NATP), told CCH. "We’ve seen the price of gas come down so it’s only natural to assume the standard mileage rate would reflect that. A drop of a half a cent won’t have that much of an impact overall."

Comment
As an alternative to the optional mileage rates, taxpayers can use the actual expense method. Actual expenses include expenditures for gas, oil, repairs, tires, insurance, registration fees, licenses, and other qualified costs.

The business and medical/moving rates are calculated by the IRS and an independent contractor. Included in the calculation are the fixed and variable costs of operating a motor vehicle, such as expenses for fuel and maintenance.

Mileage rates. For 2014, the business standard mileage rate will be 56 cents-per-mile. The rate for qualified medical/moving expenses will be 23.5 cents-per-mile. The rate for charitable miles driven remains at 14 cents-per-mile by statute.

Depreciation/FAVR. For 2014, the depreciation component of the business standard mileage rate will be 22 cents-per mile, which is a decrease of one cent from the depreciation component for the 2013 business standard mileage rate. The standard automobile cost may not exceed $28,200 for automobiles; $30,400 for trucks and vans for purposes of computing the allowance under a FAVR plan. In contrast to other amounts, these amounts reflect an increase from 2013 levels (an additional $100 for automobiles and an additional $500 for trucks and vans).

Limitations. To use the business standard mileage rate, the taxpayer must not operate four or more vehicles at the same time, such as in a fleet vehicle operation. Also, a taxpayer may not use the business standard mileage rate for a vehicle after using any depreciation method under the Modified Accelerated Cost Recovery System (MACRS) or after claiming a Code Sec. 179 deduction for the vehicle, the IRS explained.

Effective date. The revised rates apply to deductible transportation expenses paid or incurred for business or medical/moving expenditures, or qualified charitable miles driven, on or after January 1, 2014.
Reference: PTE §8,020
Posted on 9:29 AM | Categories:

Xero Accounting : Singapore starting to take off for Xero (with Simplepay & Yodlee)

At Xero Blog we read:   Singapore is currently experiencing some great traction in the Xero ecosystem. A new Add-on payroll partner, SimplePay, is launching their product into Singapore and we are close to launching bank feeds via Yodlee for Singapore banks.

Simplepay makes Payroll easier

SimplePay is a cloud payroll solution company that started out in South Africa and then released its product for neighboring Botswana. It has long recognised the need for country specific payroll solutions. It has a product in development for the UK and has now released its product into Singapore ready for Jan 1 – the start of the Singapore financial year.
png;base64124fd7321f7d7589
While the functionality of payroll is similar worldwide, the different compliance requirements of each country alters the product somewhat. In Singapore’s case, there’s no PAYE, instead a raft of payroll statutory contributions or levies to various funds to calculate.
SimplePay found Inland Revenue Authority of Singapore (IRAS) to be fairly efficient in obtaining the information they need to become compliant, and have now received approval from IRAS for e-submission of employment income. The product has been tested by users while in beta, with some customers using it for their full payroll solution even prior to it going fully live. As a special introductory offer, sign up to SimplePay and enter your chart of accounts before the end of December and you won’t pay anything until February.

Yodlee bank feeds on the horizon

Bank feeds via Yodlee will also become available for many Singapore banks. We have  dedicated teams working in both the Xero and Yodlee office to enable bank feeds where direct bank feeds are unavailable. Before this increased co-operation, we had no say as to what banks Yodlee would set up feeds for, but we are now able to request Yodlee feeds based on customer demand.
Enabling Singapore bank feeds is the first big project as a result of this co-operation and they are now at the beta testing stage, due to go live in the New Year.
I encouraged Singapore accounting partners to use the beta feeds, not only to give those partners an edge in their business, but as a way of making sure Yodlee has a lot of test data. Currently  Xero is seeing beta data from OCBC Business Banking and DBS. The beta stage of feeds is open to everyone and if you’re Singapore based you can see if your bank is supported by enabling the bank feeds on your bank account. If your bank hasn’t got feeds enabled, ask them to  become part of the Xero movement by contacting your  account manager or emailing partners@xero.com.
Based on our other markets, foundation developments like this are critical for gaining traction, so it’s great to see this foothold in Singapore. Here’s to a great 2014!

Read more about Company News

1 comment

Samson 
17 December 2013 #
Good to hear about Xero gaining traction in Singapore. I hope Xero is also pursuing market in Indonesia. There is a huge opportunity there because of the population and strong internet penetration.
Visit Xero blog to comment!
Posted on 9:29 AM | Categories:

Final “Repair Regulations”: Improvements, Betterments, and Restorations / tax treatment of improvements, betterments, and restorations under the final regulations.


Final “Repair Regulations”: Improvements, Betterments, and Restorations

In September 2013, the IRS released much-anticipated final “repair” regulations that explain when taxpayers must capitalize costs and when they can deduct expenses for acquiring, maintaining, repairing, and replacing tangible property. This article is part of a series discussing important features of the regulations; it focuses on the tax treatment of improvements, betterments, and restorations under the final regulations.

Improvements

The final regulations continue to require capitalization of amounts paid to improve a unit of tangible property. A unit of property is improved if amounts are paid for activities performed by the taxpayer resulting in:
  • a betterment to the unit of property;
  • a restoration of the unit of property; or
  • adaptation of the unit of property to a new or different use.
Comment
A unit of property for this purpose consists of a group of functionally interdependent components, such as the parts of a machine, with the machine being treated as a unit of property. In the case of a building, the building (including its structural components) is a unit of property. However, certain major systems of the building—such as heating, air conditioning, and ventilation (HVAC); plumbing; and electrical—are treated as separate units of property for purposes of determining whether there has been a capitalizable betterment, restoration, or adaption to the system.
The final regulations retain the unit of property rules in the temporary regulations. For real property, the regulations continue to apply the rules to both the building structure and to specified building systems. They also keep certain simplifying conventions, including a routine maintenance safe harbor and the optional regulatory accounting method.


Comment
The IRS explained that application of the improvement rules to both the building structure and the defined building systems is necessary to help ensure that the improvement standards are applied equitably and consistently across building property.

Removal Costs

The final regulations clarify that the cost of removing a depreciable asset or a component of a depreciable asset is not capitalized as an improvement if the taxpayer realizes gain or loss on the removed asset or component. If a taxpayer disposes of a component of a unit of property and the disposal is not a disposition on which gain or loss is realized, then the taxpayer deducts the costs of removing the component if the removal costs directly benefit or are incurred by reason of a repair to the unit of property. Otherwise, the removal costs are capitalized as part of the improvement costs to the unit of property.


Comment
Under proposed MACRS disposition regulations that were issued in conjunction with the final repair regulations, a taxpayer may recognize a loss on the retirement of a component of an asset, such as a structural component of a building, if the taxpayer makes an election to treat the retirement as a partial disposition of an asset and recognize the loss. This election should be exercised with caution because the final regulations retain the rule in the temporary regulations which requires the capitalization of any costs related to a repair as a restoration if a loss deduction is claimed. Under the temporary MACRS regulations, which are optionally effective for tax years beginning on or after January 1, 2012, and before January 1, 2014, loss recognition on the retirement of a structural component is mandatory, unless the taxpayer places the building in a general asset account.

Safe Harbor for Small Taxpayers with Buildings

Small taxpayers complained that they could not afford to collect and maintain the documentation necessary to apply the improvement rules in the final regulations to their buildings. In response, the final regulations include an annual safe harbor election for buildings owned or leased by a taxpayer with an unadjusted basis (i.e., generally cost) no greater than $1 million.

The taxpayer must have average annual gross receipts of $10 million or less during the three preceding tax years. Gross receipts are specially defined and include income from sales (unreduced by cost of goods), services, and investments.

In the case of a lessee, the unadjusted basis of the building is equal to the total amount of (undiscounted) rent paid or expected to be paid over the entire lease term, including expected renewal periods.

Under the new exception, the small taxpayer is not required to capitalize improvements if the total amount paid for repairs, maintenance, improvements and similar activities during the year that are performed on the building does not exceed the lesser of $10,000 or two percent of the unadjusted basis of the building. Amounts deducted under the de minimis rule or the new safe harbor for routine maintenance are counted toward the $10,000 limit. No amount is deductible under the safe harbor for buildings if this limit (or the $1 million adjusted basis limit) is exceeded. The safe harbor is applied separately to each building owned or leased by the taxpayer.

Eligible property includes a building (including structural components and building systems) owned or leased by a qualifying taxpayer and, also, portions of buildings that are owned or leased and considered separate units of property under the regulations, such as an individual condominium or cooperative unit or office space. The safe harbor does not apply to costs paid with respect to exterior land improvements that are separate units of property.


Comment
Under the final regulations, small taxpayers do not have to analyze the building systems.

Comment
As with the $200 materials and supplies threshold, the IRS is given the authority to adjust the $10,000, 2-percent, and $1-million amounts in the future through published guidance.
The election is made annually on a timely filed (including extensions) original income tax return. In the case of a partnership or S corporation that owns or leases a building, the partnership or S corporation makes the election. The election may not be made by filing an application for a change in accounting method or on an amended return, unless permission to file a late election on an amended return is first obtained. The election is irrevocable.


Comment
A transitional rule allows taxpayers, by filing an amended federal tax return, to apply the safe harbor as contained in the final regulations to a tax year beginning in 2012 or 2013, even though a timely election was not initially made. This relief is also provided for certain other provisions that require an election.

Betterments

In the final regulations, the IRS has clarified the betterment rules and revised two of the betterments tests. Under the temporary regulations, a betterment is defined as an expenditure that:
  • ameliorates a material condition or defect that existed prior to the acquisition of the property or arose during the production of the property;
  • results in a material addition to the unit of property (including a physical enlargement, expansion, or extension); or
  • results in a material increase in the capacity, productivity, efficiency, strength, or quality of the unit of property or its output.
Under the final regulations, no change is made to the first betterment test. However, the second and third tests are changed to eliminate the "results in" standard. Specifically, under the final regulations, a betterment under the two revised standards now includes an expenditure if it:
  • is for a material addition, including a physical enlargement, expansion, extension, or addition of a major component to the unit of property or a material increase in the capacity, including additional cubic or linear space, of the unit of property; or
  • is reasonably expected to materially increase the productivity, efficiency, strength, quality, or output of the unit of property.
The final regulations clarify that, if an addition or increase in a particular factor cannot be measured in the context of a specific type of property, then the factor is not relevant in determining whether there has been a betterment to the property. For example, the "productivity" or "output" standards, while relevant in analyzing a machine, would normally have no relevance to a building structure and, therefore, should be ignored when considering whether expenditures result in a betterment to a building structure.
The final regulations also clarify situations involving refreshing or remodeling retail stores in particular, by fine-tuning examples in which such actions move from being maintenance activities to betterments that must be capitalized.


Comment
Facts and circumstances taken into account in determining whether an expenditure results in a betterment include, but are not limited to, the purpose of the expenditure, the physical nature of the work performed, and the effect of the expenditure on the unit of property. The treatment of an expenditure on a taxpayer's applicable financial statement is removed by the final regulations as a factor in considering whether an expenditure results in a betterment since taxpayers apply standards that may differ significantly than the standards in the regulations in determining whether to capitalize a cost for financial accounting purposes.

Restorations

The final regulations provide some relief from a rule in the temporary regulations which required a taxpayer to capitalize the entire cost of repairing property that was damaged in a casualty if the taxpayer adjusted the basis of the property as a result of claiming a casualty loss. Capitalization was required even if the adjusted basis of the building (generally, the amount to which the casualty loss is limited) was less than the amounts that could otherwise be deducted as a repair expense. Even if a taxpayer chooses not to claim a casualty loss, the basis adjustment for the loss that could be claimed is required, and the deduction of related repair expenses is prohibited under the temporary regulations.
The final regulations revise the casualty loss rule to permit a deduction for amounts spent in excess of the adjusted basis of the property damaged in a casualty event, provided they would otherwise be considered deductible repair expenses. A taxpayer is still required to capitalize amounts paid to restore damage to property that would be capitalized without regard to the casualty loss rule, but the costs required to be capitalized under the casualty loss rule are limited to the excess of (1) the taxpayer's basis adjustments resulting from the casualty event, over (2) the amount paid for restoration of damage to the unit of property that are otherwise considered capitalizable restorations. Casualty-related expenditures in excess of this limitation may be deducted as repair expenses if they so qualify.


Example
A storm damages a building with an adjusted basis of $500,000. The cost of restoring the building is $750,000, consisting of a roof replacement ($350,000) and clean-up/repair costs ($400,000). A $500,000 casualty loss is claimed. The cost of the roof must be capitalized as an improvement because it is a major component and substantial structural part of the building. The remaining $400,000 clean/up repair costs must be capitalized to the extent of the $150,000 excess of the building's adjusted basis ($500,000) over the capitalized cost of the roof ($350,000). The remaining $250,000 of repair/clean-up costs ($400,000 - $150,000) may be currently deducted.

Rebuilt Like New

The final regulations retain the rule that a capitalizable restoration includes rebuilding a unit of property to a like-new condition after the end of its class life. A property is rebuilt to a like-new condition if it is brought to the status of new, rebuilt, remanufactured, or similar status under the terms of any federal regulatory guideline or the manufacturer's original specifications. The final regulations clarify that generally a comprehensive maintenance program, conducted according to the manufacturer's original specifications, even though substantial, does not return a unit of property to like-new condition.
Posted on 9:28 AM | Categories:

Maximize Your Next Refund With These Tax Deductions And Credits

North American Precis Syndicate writes: According to the Internal Revenue Service, more than 101 million income tax refunds were issued in 2013, averaging $2,651 each. The average was a couple hundred dollars more for taxpayers who elected to have their refund directly deposited into a bank account.

Averages in 2014 will likely be similar because of tax legislation passed in the first couple days of 2013, according to TaxACT spokesperson Jessi Dolmage.

“The now-permanent and extended tax breaks will benefit taxpayers of all situations, including families, college students and homeowners,” said Dolmage.

The credits and deductions available on federal returns due April 15, 2014 include:

• Child and Dependent Care Credit—The maximum amount of child and dependent care expenses eligible for the credit is now $3,000 if you have one child or $6,000 if you have two or more children. These increased amounts are permanent.

• Child Tax Credit—The credit has been made permanent at $1,000 per child under the age of 17 at the end of 2013. This credit may be claimed in addition to the Child and Dependent Care Credit.

• Tuition and fees deduction—If you, your spouse or your dependent is enrolled in a postsecondary institution, you may be able to deduct tuition expenses as an adjustment to income, even if you don’t itemize deductions. You generally take this deduction if you don’t qualify for an education credit or other tax break for the same expenses.

• American Opportunity Tax Credit—The maximum amount of this credit for the first four years of postsecondary education costs in a degree or certificate program is $2,500 per student. Costs may include tuition, fees and course materials (books). If you don’t owe any tax, you may also be eligible to receive up to 40 percent of the credit ($1,000) as a refund.

• Educator expenses deduction—Elementary and secondary educators can deduct up to $250 in related job expenses as an adjustment to income, even if not itemizing deductions. Unlike most employee expenses, educator expenses are not reduced by 2 percent of your adjusted gross income.

• Deduction for mortgage insurance premiums—If you pay mortgage insurance premiums, also known as private mortgage insurance (PMI), you may be able to deduct premiums as mortgage interest.


• Alternative Minimum Tax—The AMT was created to ensure wealthy taxpayers receiving large tax benefits pay some tax. It will now be adjusted for inflation each year so fewer taxpayers are subject to the tax. The exemption amount rises in 2013 to $51,900 ($80,800 for married couples filing jointly). For married individuals filing separately, the exemption is $40,400.

• Adoption credit—You may qualify for a credit equal to up to $12,970 of your adoption expenses including fees, court costs, attorney fees, traveling expense and other expenses directly related to and for the principal purpose of the legal adoption of an eligible child. If your employer provides adoption benefits, you may also be able to exclude up to the same amount from your income. Both a credit and exclusion may be claimed for the same adoption but not for the same expense.

• State and local sales tax deduction—For 2013, you can still deduct state and local sales taxes. You can take this deduction or a deduction for state income tax—but not both.

As with most tax benefits, you must meet certain criteria in order to claim them on your tax return, and even if you are eligible, you may not qualify for the entire amount.

Online and mobile tax preparation programs make it easy to do your own taxes and confidently claim all your deductions and credits. As you answer simple questions, the program completes your tax forms and checks for errors and potential opportunities. One of the top solutions, TaxACT, even helps you plan for next year with guidance for the implications of the Affordable Care Act on your taxes.
Posted on 9:28 AM | Categories:

Extraordinary Tax Deductions

Peter Blank for Kiplinger writes: Okay, admit it: As you've struggled with your tax return, trying to come up with some extra deductions to pump up your refund or reduce what you owe, you've taken a few flights of fancy. "Can I claim a deduction for all those blood donations at the Red Cross?" Nope. "How about a charitable contribution for all the time I donate to the church?" No, again. "Can I count the wedding gift for my boss's daughter as an employee business expense?" Come on!

On the other hand, your fellow taxpayers have successfully claimed write-offs for many things that most of us wouldn't even imagine, ranging from cat food to a casualty loss for a vehicle totaled by a drunk driver.
Here are some of our favorites.
1. Burning Down the House
A Breaking Bad wannabe purchased a building that had been used by a religious sect and turned it into a drug lab. Unfortunately for him, a hot plate ignited his volatile chemicals, and the resulting fire gutted the building, rendering it unusable. He claimed he was entitled to a $9,000 casualty loss. Even though he was involved in an illegal activity and acted negligently, the Tax Court allowed him to claim the write-off.
2. Significant Other
A man hired his live-in girlfriend to manage several of his rental properties. Her duties included finding furniture, overseeing repairs and running his personal household. The Tax Court let him deduct as a business expense $2,500 of the $9,000 he paid her but disallowed the cost of her housekeeping chores as nondeductible personal services.
3. Playing Bass
An accomplished bass player and music professor laid a major beatdown on the IRS. He traveled to jazz rehearsals and performances to keep his skills sharp so he could play with other well-known musicians. The IRS said he could not deduct his travel costs because he enjoyed playing the bass and performing wasn't part of his teaching duties. Nevertheless, the Tax Court allowed him the write-off because he translated what he saw and heard in the music scene and taught it to his students.
4. Airplane
Rather than drive five to seven hours to check on their rental condo or be tied to the only daily commercial flight available, a couple bought their own plane. The Tax Court allowed them to deduct their condo-related trips on the aircraft, including the cost of fuel and depreciation for the portion of time used for business-related purposes, even though these costs increased their overall rental loss on the condo.
5. Cat Food
A couple who owned a junkyard were allowed to write off the cost of cat food they set out to attract wild cats. The feral felines did more than just eat. They also took care of snakes and rats on the property, making the place safer for customers. When the case reached the Tax Court, IRS lawyers conceded that the cost was deductible.
6. Cat Food, Part II
A woman used her own money to care for feral cats that she fostered in her home for a charity that specialized in the neutering of wild cats. She spent more than $12,000 of her own money paying for vet bills, food and other items.
The Tax Court ruled that she can claim a charitable deduction for her expenses, but limited her write-off because she didn't meet the substantiation rules, failing to procure a contemporaneous written acknowledgment from the charity each time she spent $250 or more on the charity's behest. With the proper documentation, she could have deducted all the costs she incurred for the organization.
7. Body Oil
A pro bodybuilder used body oil to make his muscles glisten in the lights during his competitions. The Tax Court ruled that he could deduct the cost of the oil as a business expense. Lest it be seen as a softie, though, the court nixed deductions for buffalo meat and special vitamin supplements to enhance strength and muscle development.
8. Breast Augmentation
In an effort to get bigger tips, an exotic dancer with the stage name "Chesty Love" decided to get implants to make her a size 56-FF. The IRS challenged her deduction, saying the operation was cosmetic surgery. But a Tax Court judge allowed this taxpayer to claim a depreciation deduction for her new, um, assets, equating them to a stage prop. Alas, the operation later proved to be a problem for Ms. Love. She tripped, rupturing one of her implants. That caused a severe infection, and the implants had to be removed.
9. Payments for Wrongdoing
An insurance company sued two doctors for insurance fraud. The doctors admitted liability and agreed to reimburse the insurer for the losses it sustained, and the insurance company agreed to release a claim for restitution in a pending criminal case. The IRS ruled that the repayments are deductible provided that the doctors originally included the money in their incomes in prior years. But to demonstrate that crime doesn't fully pay, the IRS said the repaid funds are a miscellaneous itemized deduction that's allowed only to the extent it exceeds 2% of the doctors' adjusted gross incomes.
10. Wrecking the Car While Drunk
A reveler drank too much at a party and had the good sense to arrange a ride home. A few hours later, after slowing down in his revelry, he thought he was okay to drive. Unfortunately, the vehicle he was operating slid off the road and rolled over. The cops arrested him for drunken driving because his blood alcohol reading was just over the legal limit. His insurer refused to pay for the damage to his car because of the arrest. Yet the Tax Court let him deduct the cost of the damage as casualty loss because it said that he had tried to act reasonably. Had he driven straight home from the party with a high blood alcohol level and had the accident, the court declared that it would have nixed his deduction because his actions would have constituted gross negligence.
11. Free Beer
In a novel promotion, a service-station owner gave his customers free beer as a promotion. Proving that alcohol and gasoline do mix--for tax purposes--the Tax Court allowed the write-off as a business expense.
12. Making Movies
A lawyer faced a challenge from the IRS as she sought to deduct losses during the six years she spent making a documentary film on the musical group Up With People. The IRS claimed the long series of annual losses indicated that her filmmaking activities were a hobby, asserting the project was essentially a high-cost home movie because her husband once was a member of that group.
Furthermore, at one point during hearings, the judge reviewing the case suggested that documentary filmmaking is by nature not-for-profit--a musing that so alarmed the film industry that a number of well-known filmmakers filed friend-of-court rulings to say, in essence, that you can make money with documentaries.
Ultimately, the court ruled in her favor, allowing her deduction of six-figure losses. It noted that she acted in a businesslike manner, hiring staff such as a bookkeeper, buying insurance, consulting experts, changing the story line to make the film more marketable, blogging about it, and taking it on tour to movie festivals.
13. Babysitting Fees
Fees paid to a sitter to enable a parent to get out of the house and do volunteer work for a charity are deductible as charitable contributions even though the money didn't go directly to the charity, according to the Tax Court. The court expressly rejected a contrary IRS revenue ruling.
14. Landscaping
A sole proprietor who regularly met clients in his home office was allowed to deduct part of the costs of landscaping the property, on the grounds that it was a part of the home being used for business, according to the Tax Court. The court also allowed a deduction for part of the costs of lawn care and driveway repairs.
15. Swimming Pool
A taxpayer with emphysema put in a pool after his doctor told him to develop an exercise regime. He swam in it twice a day and improved his breathing capacity. Turns out he swam in the pool more than his family did. The Tax Court allowed him to deduct the cost of the pool (to the extent the cost exceeded the amount it added to the value of the property) as a medical expense because its primary purpose was for medical care. Also, the cost of heating the pool, pool chemicals and a proportionate part of insuring the pool area are treated as medical expenses.
Posted on 9:28 AM | Categories:

Are Advisor Management Fees Deductible?

Tiffany C. Wright, Demand Media & AZ Central writes:  Small Business Owners often do not have the revenue or profitability to hire an executive management team during the earlier stages of their business. Therefore, they may rely on an advisory board or an external business advisor to assist them in managing their business. If these individuals or firms are compensated, the advisor management fees are fully tax deductible as long as these arrangements are treated as arm's length engagements. "Arm's length" means both parties act independently, in their own interests, as if they have no relationship.


External Consultants and Coaches

A business can deduct 100 percent of any monies it pays to external consultants for professional services, business assistance or management advice. For example, a company may engage a strategic advisory firm to help it determine the best strategy to enter into a new market or sell more products. Alternatively, a business owner who needs ongoing help working through various issues may hire a business coach. She may meet with that coach weekly to identify the source of the problems and come up with solutions. Both of these scenarios have a real business purpose and are therefore deductible as a business expense.

Legal and Professional Fees

Most small business owners claim the amounts they pay to business coaches, business advisors, strategy consultants and other advisor management professionals under "legal and professional fees" on their income statements. Owners must obtain an invoice for the services provided. The invoice must clearly state the name of the service provider, the description of the service provided and the cost of the service. Owners must retain these invoices as proof of services in case of an audit by the Internal Revenue Service.


Disallowed Deductions

There have been several legal cases where the Internal Revenue Service disallowed the tax deductions for advisor management services. In two cases reviewed for this article, the owner formed a separate company to provide management or advisory services to another company he owned. In these cases, neither company maintained accurate records of the services provided or the reasons behind the services. Invoices either did not exist or were irregular and lacked critical information. The IRS subsequently saw that one owner owned both companies and disallowed the tax deduction for the payments.

Related Entity Deduction Requirements

If a business pays a business advisory fee to a related party, that business advisory must be an arm's-length, traceable transaction. To avoid having the IRS disallow the tax deduction, owners must treat transactions between companies they own as they would treat transactions with a third party. A legitimate, provable business reason for obtaining the business advice must exist, and the person providing the advice must not work for both entities. A contract or proposal for services must exist, and the providing entity must invoice the other on a periodic basis.
Posted on 9:28 AM | Categories: