Wednesday, May 29, 2013

New Website for Tax Pros Introduces Tax Planning Tool

 Yourbusinessmattersinc.com, a unique new Web-based subscription service for tax professionals, has added a new tax planning tool that enables subscribers to provide clients with specific considerations and recommendations for 2013 tax planning.
"This new add-on to our regular monthly service plans — at no additional cost — enables tax preparers to be more proactive for their clients," said Chris Basom, the company's founder and a tax accountant/financial planner. "It enables them to serve clients year-round and protect them from nasty surprises in April."
By using data from the clients' last year's tax return, the new tool requires just 24 quick inputs to instantly render a tax planning action list for clients. It accounts for the impact of new tax laws, including those related to the Affordable Care Act, any changes in state and federal tax rates, capital losses carried forward, passive losses carried forward and the child-care tax credit, among others. It also discusses the impact of the Alternative Minimum Tax and any tax underpayment. This enables tax professionals to anticipate liabilities and help clients avoid them or, failing that, to alert them so they can work with tax professionals on a strategy to pay them.
"By using this tax planning tool, our subscribers have a tangible reason to meet with their clients in summer and fall, and can demonstrate to clients that they can help them succeed financially," Basom added. "The benefit for tax professionals from having this kind of conversation with clients is that they naturally segue into advice on wealth management and financial planning, expanding the existing advisor/client relationship."
Tax professionals, who subscribe to the online platform for its suite of business growth tools, may charge their clients for the new tax planning service or include it in their existing service arrangement as a value-added item.  "The practitioner can decide whether – and if so, how much – they want to charge for this specific service, said William Hamilton, the company's general manager. "Our tools are designed so the tax professional can use them any way that works best for their individual practice. They run the show."
The tax planning analysis, like the rest of the site's growing suite of tools, helps tax professionals set themselves apart from their competition. The site includes training guides, analytical/financial analysis tools, document templates, and marketing tools, all designed around a robust client relationship management (CRM) system. Access to the portal enables tax professionals to grow their businesses and take advantage of industry changes at a time when their survival is threatened by the commoditization of tax prep and accounting services.
The user-friendly site is a unique all-in-one solution that combines specialized educational content with seamless CRM functionality and unique revenue-boosters. "Nowhere else are all these features and functions available in one place," said Basom. "The site includes everything the tax preparer needs to go beyond tax returns and deliver client-centric financial analysis services at a time when delivering   value is critical for tax preparers to attract and retain clients."
The basic subscription ($69 monthly) provides access to training guides, analysis tools, marketing templates and CRM features that allow subscribers to upload and manage client data, issue reports and track clients' status. It also features a legal document prep system that users can access to prepare customized documents for items including wills, trusts and incorporations. Premium subscriptions ($99 per month) include an online calendar function that integrates with their users' websites, enabling their clients to schedule their own appointments.  
All subscribers get unlimited free telephone, email and chat support from a dedicated support team. And all subscribers can upload substantial amounts of client data onto the highly securewebsite, protected by 256-bit encryption. Free 30-day trials are available simply by visiting the website.
Posted on 5:55 AM | Categories:

How Well Do Banks Serve Small Businesses? / It's a matter of debate among observers of the banking and growth-company communities.

 Marielle Segarra for CFO writes: Do banks provide what their small-business customers need? One viewpoint is that they focus too much on loans and not enough on other potentially useful services. 
“The most profitable products banks have are the loan products,” says BC Krishna, president and CEO of online payment tool provider MineralTree. “If you’re going to sell loans, you need to segment your customers by the products that most likely appeal to them.” That often means grouping customers by revenue ranges, but there is no industry-wide definition for small companies, Krishna says.
When it comes to payments, for instance, revenue may not even be an effective way to segment businesses. “A million-dollar doctor’s office is nothing like a million-dollar construction company from a payments standpoint,” Krishna says. For example, they use different tools and have varying levels of receivables and payables. “A construction company might use software like [Sage 300 Construction and Real Estate] to manage its accounts, whereas a doctor’s office might use Quickbooks. Or the office manager might be the one that takes appointments and enters bills in a doctor’s office, whereas at a construction company a controller might do that job.”
MineralTree wrote in a recent whitepaper that 88 percent of banks have strategic initiatives to grow small- and midsize-business market share over the next one to three years. But only 35 percent of the banks surveyed said they are meeting small-business payment needs well or very well (a result that behooves MineralTree’s business interests).
The banks’ hyper-focus on loans, perhaps at the expense of other services, could do a disservice to small-business customers, Krishna says. “Take our business. If a bank didn’t tell me, how would I know about an electronic product or a better payments product? I don’t have time as a small business owner to keep doing research on all of the inefficiencies that I might know or not know about in my business.”
But Gary Young, CEO of banking risk management consultancy Young & Associates, says he has not noticed banks focusing on loans over other services. “Small business is the lifeblood of the community banking industry,” he says. “They are by far the most profitable customers. There’s more risk involved, but it’s extremely difficult to make a decent return on equity without successfully implementing a strategy for meeting the needs of small business.”
Community banks “can’t take care of the biggest businesses in the country because they have legal lending limits, so they have to focus on small business,” Young notes. “I just do not see, in a strategic planning process, that any bank would turn its back on that business line.”
Young does allow that there can be “a disconnect between what small businesses want and what banks can deliver.” A small business might be interested in a service that a bank does not consider profitable, for instance, or a small business might request a loan that the bank is not willing to approve.
Krishna acknowledges that not all banks will want to get involved with specific services. “The list of things that a bank can potentially help their customers with is quite long,” he says.
For their part small businesses said in a survey conducted last year that they have been underserved. Their satisfaction with banks trails that of retail banking customers, according to the 2012 J.D. Power and Associates U.S. Small Business Banking Satisfaction Study.
Posted on 5:55 AM | Categories:

QuickBooks Online vs. QuickBooks Desktop – Which one is right for your business?

Ed Becker for OSYB writes: With an ever-expanding collection of features and options, businesses are left with a difficult choice between QuickBooks Online and QuickBooks Desktop. It is important to analyze your business strategy and choose a platform that will be most beneficial to your unique business model.

The Key Differences

QuickBooks Online lives in the cloud. It functions as software-as-a-service (SaaS), which means you must have an Internet connection to access the program. However, you do not need to install the program on your business computer and can access your data from any device, including most smartphones and tablets. This differs from the desktop version, which must be manually installed, but does not require an Internet connection.
In terms of functionality, these two platforms are surprisingly different. Although the QuickBooks brand name implies otherwise, the core software of each program was developed with independent objectives. The Online version is designed to run efficiently in the cloud, but lacks many of the complex forecasting and budgeting features found on the desktop version. Check out the full QuickBooks features comparison.
5 Exclusive Features to QuickBooks Online
  • Delayed Customer Billing
  • Automated Email Reports
  • Multiple Users at No Additional Cost
  • Activity Log
  • Simultaneous Remote Access to Data
5 Exclusive Features of QuickBooks Desktop
  • Prepare 1099s
  • Budget vs. Accrual Job Costing
  • Balance Sheet by Class
  • Mileage Tracking
  • Advanced Excel Export

What’s the Damage?

Cost is typically on the forefront of small business decisions. The pricing model is completely different for each platform as outlined below.
QuickBooks Online starts with a free 30-day trial before defaulting to $26.95 per month for the core software, or $52.76 per month with payroll. Your total annual spend (not including the free trial) for QuickBooks Online will amount to $323.40 or $633.12, respectively.
QuickBooks Pro 2013, on the other hand, requires a full one-time payment of $199 for the core version of the software. You can tack on an additional $329 per year if plan on running payroll through QuickBooks, bringing the total cost to $528 for the first year. It is important to note that updated QuickBooks software is released annually, but you are not required purchase the latest version every year. It is typical to update QuickBooks software every 3 years.

Choosing the Right Platform

The primary advantage of QuickBooks Online is the ability to operate within the cloud. In addition, it can perform automated email reporting and delayed customer billing, allowing you put your bookkeeping duties on autopilot. If you’re the type of business owner who is rarely in the office, the online version will offer the flexibility needed to manage bookkeeping on the run. The initial costs are also much lower, which can be an important benefit for a bootstrapping start-up company.
QuickBooks Desktop offers several key advantages over its online counterpart. First, the functionality of the desktop software is vastly superior and includes powerful features like inventory tracking, time tracking, and budgeting. In addition, enabling the Intuit Remote Access app for $3.95 per month will provide the ability to access your QuickBooks Data via the Internet.
Ultimately, you as the business owner will need to determine which features will help your business thrive in the future.
Posted on 5:54 AM | Categories:

Freelancers Get Jobs Via Web Services / Sites Like TaskRabbit Connect Workers Seeking Employment With Employers Who Need Their Skills

Across her career, Brigitte Ebert, a mother of three in San Mateo, Calif., worked nine-to-five jobs like retail sales. Last year, seeking more time with her children, she started picking up odd jobs on TaskRabbit Inc., a website where individuals hire helpers for microtasks.
This spring, an early test of a new TaskRabbit service connected her with consistent, 10-hour-a-week freelance work as office-food manager at tech startup Platfora Inc., refilling coffee cups and wrangling snacks for engineers. That service for businesses, which TaskRabbit launched last week, let Platfora shop for Ms. Ebert's part-time help the same way it might buy supplies on eBay Inc. EBAY +1.60%
It also has given Ms. Ebert the chance to be a new kind of corporate temp worker, placed not through staffing firms but online. "It gives me the freedom to choose my hours, but within a schedule that works for me and the company," says Ms. Ebert, who is in her 40s.
TaskRabbit executives hope to tap a shift in the U.S. economy toward freelance and "micro-entrepreneurial" work. They aren't alone: websites and apps such as the digital-work marketplace Elance Inc., ride-on-demand service Lyft Inc., and handmade and vintage marketplace Etsy Inc. are growing as they connect workers with Internet-savvy employers and customers.
Meanwhile, workers are building their own reputations and portfolios online at sites likeLinkedIn Corp. LNKD -2.66% "Five to 10 years from now, how people manage their careers and find what they're going to do is going to look radically different," says TaskRabbit's chief revenue officer, Anne Raimondi.
"We've had subcontracting forever, [but] today what's new is you can do it with a laptop." adds Dane Stangler, director of research and policy at the Ewing Marion Kauffman Foundation in Kansas City, Mo., who estimates that about 10% of U.S. workers are freelancers.
The shift toward freelancing—and the growth of Internet startups that are fueling the trend—comes as technology has automated many rote jobs and enabled a more efficient market for ad hoc projects. Firms are benefiting from lower costs to locate workers with specific or unusual skills, and workers are spotting new opportunities.
The website Elance, which lets freelancers bid for jobs like programming or designing that they can complete over the Internet, has attracted more than 500,000 businesses and two million freelancers, about a third of whom are based in the U.S.
"Businesses are discovering that some of the same efficiency of e-commerce can be applied to hiring," says Chief Executive Fabio Rosati. Elance is on track to pay workers about $300 million this year, up from $200 million last year.
Across nine cities, TaskRabbit now has more than 11,000 vetted workers, over 75% of whom have bachelor's degrees. About 10% make a full-time living on the site, and 40% are self-employed. Many are stay-at-home mothers or people seeking to supplement their income from another job.
Ms. Raimondi says the company, founded in 2008, is seeking to widen its slice of the market to include outplacement services because businesses—some 16,000 of them since February—are already posting job listings to the site.
TaskRabbit now lets employers browse candidate profiles and reviews by employers as well as chat online with prospects, adding a fee of 26% on top of the new employee's salary, or about half what traditional temp services charge. TaskRabbit also offers such services as filing W2 tax forms and providing workers' compensation and unemployment insurance.
All of this appealed to Anne Ricci, the Platfora manager who hired Ms. Ebert. Ms. Ricci says she wasn't ready to commit to adding another full-timer to the 50-person company and didn't want to use a temp agency.
All the activity has job-search websites and temp-worker firms taking note and taking action. Staffing giant ManpowerGroup Inc. MAN +1.86% is working with OnForce Inc., a site that matches independent contractors with tech tasks, such as setting up a home theater or troubleshooting computer problems. And Kelly Services Inc.,KELYA +2.06% which has placed temporary workers since 1946, doesn't broker micro-taskers now but "we're looking at that," says CEO Carl T. Camden.
Not everyone is enthusiastic, however. Individual microtask sites have their place, says Sara Horowitz, founder and executive director of the Freelancers Union, but the trend of stripping work down to discrete, short-term projects without benefits for workers is troubling.
The Brooklyn, N.Y.-based nonprofit helps its more than 200,000 members post and find jobs and get health insurance and other services. TaskRabbit and others might be "great for kids in high school or college to pick up some work," Ms. Horowitz says. "But as a human being, for a person caring about policy or labor conditions, you have to say, what is happening here?"
A TaskRabbit spokesman says the site makes sure that workers "are not just satisfied but happy with the experience." And he adds, "Benefits are something we are constantly exploring."
Ms. Ebert, who works through TaskRabbit at other cooking, delivery and administrative jobs as well as Platfora, agrees there are drawbacks. "It's not an easy way to get rich," she says. She doesn't earn a full-time living as a TaskRabbit, she adds, though she thinks she could if she tried. She also gets her health insurance through her spouse.
Still, Ms. Ebert likes working the way she does because "it gives the person who doesn't run their own business the chance to be self-employed." Recently, she persuaded her sister to become a TaskRabbit, too.
Posted on 5:53 AM | Categories:

Tuesday, May 28, 2013

High-return tax-efficient or low-return tax-inefficient assets in Roth IRA?

From Reddit Personal Finance we read: I see a lot of guides (e.g. Bogleheads) recommend putting tax-inefficient assets in tax-advantaged accounts, which makes sense. However I would think that due to the contribution limits on tax-advantaged accounts like a Roth IRA you would also do better putting an asset with a high rate of return in rather than one with a low rate of return. My reasoning is as follows:

If you put $100 of bonds yielding 3% in dividends into a Roth and $100 of 7% stocks into a taxable account taxable at a 25% capital gains tax rate, both set to reinvest earnings, and cash out after ten years, you end up with $34.99 in untaxed bond dividends and $101.38 in capital gains taxed at 25% (so $76.04). This results in a net return of $111.03.

On the other hand, if you put $100 of bonds yielding 3% in dividends distributed quarterly into a taxable account taxed at a 33% marginal tax rate and $100 of stocks yielding 7% into a Roth, both set to reinvest earnings, and cash out after ten years, you end up with (I think) $22.26 in bond dividends and $101.38 in untaxed capital gains. This results in a net return of $123.64.
Is there something off with my math? Am I misunderstanding or missing something to do with investments and taxes? Or is this the correct way to manage the portfolio with respect to taxes this combination of tax efficiency and yield? Is there anything else I should consider?

Since I'm not sure I calculated bond return in the second scenario correctly, here's my method: I had a gross return of 3% annually, but that was taxed at 33%, which lowered my net return to (3%)*(67%)=2.01%. I then calculated the continuously compounded return at 2.01%.

all 8 comments
[–]kurds_way 2 points  ago
The Bogleheads advice is still usually correct, though less important than it once was due to low interest rates and tax law changes.
At a glance, what % of that 7% stock return is divs and what's cap gains in your model? And don't forget to adjust for risk - $1 in a pretax taxable account is less risky than $1 in a Roth.
[–]Kibatsu[S] 1 point  ago
I was modeling the stock return as 100% capital gains to make the point about tax efficiency vs return rate while keeping it as simple as possible. I'm less interested in the precise numbers than knowing if high enough returns can trump tax-inefficiency for space in a tax-advantaged account, which it seems is possible. The difference between calculating expected returns and variance to choose allocations versus not worrying about it and following the Bogleheads advice, I suppose.
[–]kurds_way 2 points  ago
I was modeling the stock return as 100% capital gains
Well there's your problem. The reason stocks in taxable works is that most of the stock gains grow tax deferred for decades, sometimes forever. You've just turned a tax efficient investment into a very tax inefficient one.
Also, note my point about risk adjusting (picture what you'd be left with if stocks dropped 99.99% at the end of the period with each alternative).
The difference between calculating expected returns and variance to choose allocations versus not worrying about it and following the Bogleheads advice, I suppose.
Better to prove stuff to yourself - sometimes Bogleheads gets it right, sometimes not so much ;)
[–]Kibatsu[S] 1 point  ago
You've just turned a tax efficient investment into a very tax inefficient one.
Is this because the stocks are being sold after too short a period, then? Or because of something about capital gains vs income taxes I've missed?
[–]kurds_way 2 points  ago
You're assuming every year you sell you entire stock holding, pay cap gains on it, then buy it back. A little spreadsheet work will show this costs you a lot more in taxes that modeling what actually happens, where you only pay taxes on the divs, and don't pay cap gains until you sell (or avoid cap gains completely).
[–]Kibatsu[S] 1 point  ago
I don't think that's what I did, unless it was implicit somehow. I allowed the stock value to appreciate at 7% annually for ten years, and then took the profit at the end of the ten year period and took 25% off. The capital gains tax applies to the whole profit at the point of sale, right? Not just the profit in that year? ($100 * exp[0.07 * 10] - $100) * 0.75 = $76.03
[–]kurds_way 1 point  ago
Oh, so you're assuming no div taxes paid each year. In that case your $100 grows to $134.39 (100*1.0710), then you pay 25% taxes on the $34.39 gains, for an after tax value of $125.79.
[–]Plum12345 1 point  ago
Its not that you made a mistake, but it all depends on the numbers you choose. Why did you pick 10 years? If you pick 30 then its a whole different story because of compounding.
Another thing to consider is the state you live in. I live in California. My state income tax is over 10%. Some general obligation bonds are both state and federal tax free and very safe.
Posted on 9:58 AM | Categories:

Tax-managed indexing can offer boost / Such strategies can offer can be even better than ETFs and mutual funds

Rey Santodomingo for Investment News writes: 2013 will be a year of higher taxes for many high income earners. The passage of the American Tax Payer's Relief Act of 2012 and the addition of the 3.8% unearned income Medicare tax leads to higher investment taxes. For top tax bracket investors, short-term capital gains tax rates have increased from 35% to 43.4% – an increase of close to 25%. Long-term capital gains tax rates increased from 15% to 23.8% – an increase of close to 60%. Higher taxes for investors creates an opportunity for advisers to help their clients even more by helping them to invest more tax efficiently.
In the current high-tax environment, advisers need to pay more attention to taxes because of the drag they cause on wealth growth. The amount may surprise you. Tax drag can reduce investment growth by 1%-3% annually. This is even higher than the amount many people pay in management fees. Given the current state of government debt and budget deficit, tax rates are not expected to be lowered any time soon. Advisers should assess their clients' exposure to the harsh tax rate environment and adjust accordingly. One powerful tool that advisers need to consider is tax-managed indexing.
Most advisers know about tax-efficient strategies such as the use of tax-deferred accounts, municipal bonds, year-end loss harvesting and low turnover indexing strategies. Indexing or passive index investing entails investing in a broadly diversified index like the S&P 500® or the Russell 3000®. One way to get exposure to these indexes is through an ETF or a mutual fund. Compared to active mutual funds, passive index mutual funds tend to be relatively tax efficient. This is because the indexes exhibit very low turnover and subsequently distribute few capital gains. ETFs, in general, tend to be a little more tax efficient than mutual funds because they are able to avoid some capital gain realization through in-kind redemptions, and because mutual funds are often forced to realize (and distribute) gains when investors redeem shares. Some mutual funds that are labeled tax advantaged strive to reduce capital gain distributions by realizing losses to offset any gains. While these approaches are tax efficient, by employing tax managed indexing in a separately managed account, one has the opportunity for additional tax efficient exposure.
As an alternative to ETFs and indexed mutual funds, separately managed accounts can offer flexibility that results in a hyper-tax-efficient index exposure. Unlike ETFs and index funds, a separately managed account can pass capital losses through to the individual investor. Realized capital losses are valuable because they can be used to offset capital gains, thereby reducing an investor's tax bill. A tax-managed separate account can be designed to seek index returns similar to those from an ETF or mutual fund, but with the added benefit of excess realized losses. Here's how it works…
Two goals of tax managed indexing are: (1) to track the selected index; and (2) to produce a tax benefit through excess realized losses. As an example, consider an S&P 500® benchmarked, tax-managed portfolio. Initially, the portfolio is invested in about 250 securities selected to track the index. The securities and weights are selected such that the portfolio very closely resembles the index in terms of sector and industry weights. Care is also taken to ensure that the portfolio lines up against the index in terms of risk factors like yield, beta, and market capitalization. After the initial portfolio is invested, it is continuously monitored for risk and tax-loss harvesting opportunities. With a portfolio of 250 securities, some equity prices will rise and some will fall. The names that go down present loss harvesting opportunities. When such opportunities occur, the portfolio is loss harvested. The tax lots exhibiting a loss are sold, and a replacement set of securities is bought. Care is taken not to violate wash sale rules. The intended result is a portfolio that closely tracks the index while also producing excess realized losses.
Excess losses realized by a tax-managed index portfolio can be used to offset gains that exist elsewhere in the investor's overall portfolio. Taxable gains may be generated from the investor's active manager investments, hedge fund investments, or sale of real estate or concentrated stock. In the end, the goal is for investors to pay fewer taxes, keep more of their money invested and reap the benefits of tax deferral.
With the recent increase in taxes, advisers need to consider tax-efficient strategies in order to help their clients retain more of what they earn. Tax-efficient solutions such as ETFs and mutual funds are a good start, but hyper-tax-efficient strategies like tax-managed indexing can be even better.
Posted on 9:58 AM | Categories:

Monday, May 27, 2013

Self-directed IRAs: Risky? Smart? Or both?

James Sterngold for MarketWatch writes:  Rick Kahler can’t explain the mysteries of string theory, speak Mandarin or quote long passages from the Odyssey, but after buying and selling hundreds of properties for 30 years, he has a virtual Ph.D. in real estate.


That’s why the South Dakota native felt quite comfortable some years ago when he made what the rest of us might think of as an obscure investment, plunking down $7,500 to acquire a tax-lien certificate on a piece of property in his hometown of Rapid City. The certificate gave Kahler the right to the delinquent taxes on the property, plus interest, if the city collected them. He’d get the whole place if the owner defaulted. County records included a photo of a sturdy looking house and showed there were no other liens or mortgages.
Months later, the deed arrived in the mail, and the property was his. So he decided to drive over and check the place out. That’s when he noticed something was amiss. There was no roof or windows, not even a front door to knock on. In fact, there was no a house at all. Kahler had bought himself a vacant lot. The dwelling had burned down years before.
Kahler, now a financial adviser who manages $195 million in client funds, recounts the story with a chuckle, but this particular flop wasn’t just for any investment. He had planned to use this, actually, to help him retire. Indeed, while many Americans rely on their savings or 401(k) plans to see them through their golden years, high-end folks are falling in love with another option—something called the self-directed individual retirement account.
The idea is simple enough: Invest in anything you want, but put the investment into a special IRA, so it isn’t taxed until retirement. Suddenly, if you have enough wealth to get into alternative investing, the possibilities become almost limitless for setting up your future. If dressage horses are your thing, go ahead and invest in them. Sunflower farms? Sure. A heli-skiing business? No problem. And it doesn’t even have to be thrilling stuff. A lot of people are staking their retirements, at least in part, on everything from self-storage facilities to rental properties.
How many people are doing this isn’t exactly known because it’s not formally tracked. The Securities and Exchange Commission last year estimated that about 2% of all IRAs are self-directed, which works out to more than $100 billion. Clearly, it’s seen some crazy growth. In 2005, Millennium Trust Co., an Oak Brook, Ill., firm that is one of largest custodians of self-directed IRAs, handled about $733 million in assets; today, it administers $6.1 billion. Similarly, another big player, Pensco Trust, in San Francisco, is handling $10.3 billion in assets after acquiring another trust company to take advantage of industry expansion. Five years ago, it was $1.5 billion.
But while numbers like that are certainly impressive, some experts are expressing serious reservations about the skyrocketing growth of self-directed IRAs (we’ll call them SD-IRAs from now on—maybe it will catch on). That is because many parts of this business aren’t regulated. Indeed, critics say it’s called “self” for a reason. The accounts are administered by specialized custodians and trust banks rather than mainstream banks and brokerages. The administrators make sure you’ve got all your paperwork in order and provide annual valuations, but that’s about it: They don’t identify, recommend or vet investments. That job is solely up to the person whose name is on the account—in your case, that would be, uh, you.
One option, of course, is to hire someone with the expertise to do the due diligence when investing in alternative assets. Most of the people who successfully invest in SD-IRAs, however, seem to prefer to go it alone. Perhaps they possess specific expertise thanks to a lifelong career or hobby. Or maybe they’re tight with an entrepreneur or two, or three. Others just like learning new things and doing the homework. What these folks all have in common is that they see the do-it-yourself approach to alternative investing as a positive. It’s a chance to achieve wide diversification, be truly hands-on and exploit opportunities to earn above-average returns. It’s all about self-reliance. Ralph Waldo Emerson would love it.
As flexible as these accounts are, the law that created them back in 1974, the Employee Retirement Income Securities Act, does exclude some types of investments. The rules enforced by the Internal Revenue Service mostly are intended to prohibit self-dealing or stuffing an account with things that might be considered more than just an investment. Art and other collectibles such as antiques and stamps are no-nos. Life insurance, tangible personal property and booze—sorry, no wine cellars—are also verboten. You can buy a yacht with an SD-IRA, but only if it’s used in a legitimate charter business, and only if you keep your topsiders off it. Another important area that’s out of bounds: your family. There’s no helping the kids with a down payment on a house or cousin Joey with his scheme to open a disco carwash. You also can’t borrow from an SD-IRA or use the assets as collateral. Otherwise, feel free to get creative.
The recent growth in self-directed retirement accounts mirrors the broadening popularity of alternative investments of all kinds. Institutional investors have been using alternatives for years, of course, often putting up to a quarter of their assets in private equity, hedge funds, real estate and private partnerships. In a study last year titled “The Mainstreaming of Alternative Investments,” McKinsey & Co. noted that the trend has been catching on in retail accounts, too, leading to an expansion of 14 % a year in managed alternative assets “despite a very public flame out during the crisis” in 2008. Globally, alternative assets under management shot up to $6.5 trillion in 2011, from $2.9 trillion in 2005, the report says.
To a degree, the trend has been fueled by disappointment with Wall Street’s usual offerings. Joseph Mara, 62, a financial adviser in Palm Beach, Fla., is a case in point. He got interested in alternatives after souring on stocks and bonds. He opened his first self-directed account in 2011 for a portion of his seven-figure retirements savings. “I don’t have to tell you how disappointed we all have been with traditional assets in the past decade or so,” Mara says. His first foray involved a Las Vegas-based fantasy camp that lets would-be musicians jam with real rock ‘n’ rollers like Dave Navarro, Jon Bon Jovi and Roger Daltrey. Mara says he pored over the camp’s financial statements carefully and did his own analysis of what it would take to expand the business before agreeing to invest $200,000. He now expects his private-partnership interest in the camp to yield 12 to 15 % annually over its anticipated five-year life span. At his age, he says, he can’t tie up all of his dough in long-term deals. Yet he was so pleased with his first venture that he is now planning a second, a $100,000 investment in a private company that offers corporate training and development.
Howard Sontag, a former tax lawyer at Lazard Freres & Co. and now the chief executive of Sontag Advisory in New York, says he steers affluent clients into self-directed accounts to take advantage of the tax benefits when they invest in high-yielding alternatives such as middle-market leveraged-loan funds, which can spin off huge flows of cash—at returns of 10% or more—with minimum investments of $500,000 or so. Occasionally, wealthier clients from Wall Street firms use SD-IRAs to hold private-equity interests, which are often acquired at low valuations and can be illiquid for years.
Then there are the truly unorthodox investors, like Rajeev Kotyan, 43, a partner in the financial firm NUA Advisors, in Lexington, Mass. As a money pro, Kotyan fully understands the appeal of something like a Standard & Poor’s 500 index fund as well as the importance of portfolio diversification. Even so, he’s invested 70 % of his own retirement savings into alternative assets in an SD-IRA. He started out buying real estate, but when a friend, a farmer in California, mentioned how difficult it was to get financing for dairy cows, Kotyan had an inspiration: He’d front cash for the cows using funds from his IRA; the farmer would lease them back with an option to buy after five years. Kotyan studied animal husbandry, the milk market and how to gain title on a cow, but let his buddy handle the heifers. “I did lie awake for the first month wondering, ‘What have I gotten myself into?’” Kotyan says. But he says the arrangement worked well and the—pause for dramatic effect—moo-lah was marvelous: He ended up earning a 20 % return tax-free.
Kotyan also invested in competitive dressage horses. At first, “I didn’t even know what dressage meant,” he says. But a horse handler at a farm in New Jersey told him a story that piqued his interest: Americans were willing to pay hefty premiums for high-quality competitors from Europe. Kotyan says he went to work investigating every aspect of the sport, in which horses and their riders perform a sort of equestrian ballet. “One of my first surprises was finding out that horses have passports with photos,” he says. He teamed up with the horse handler, forming a private partnership that acquired successful dressage horses in Europe—with names like Whitney and Franziskana—and then brought them to the U.S. Elaborate measures had to be taken to prove the identity and health of the horses, including samples of blood and tissue. In essence, the two investors flipped horses, buying them in Europe, importing them and then selling them for what turned out to be big profits in 2008 and 2009. While prices for dressage horses sometimes reach several hundred thousand dollars, Kotyan and his partner limited their downside risk by keeping their acquisitions below $40,000. The venture delivered about a 35 % return for his self-directed account.
The fees paid to the custodians of SD-IRAs are generally much steeper than in traditional accounts. Millennium Trust charges $50 to open an account, a $300 annual fee no matter the size of the account, a $125 holding fee per asset or security and a $250 transaction fee for real-estate investments bought for the accounts, according to T. Scott McCartan, the firm’s chief executive. Not only does income from the assets remain in the account, but the expenses needed to maintain the assets—such as upkeep on rental properties, taxes and management fees—must come from the IRA too. As with any trust arrangement, investors aren’t allowed to commingle their personal funds with the trust’s funds. That’s why advisers urge that investors keep a cash cushion in their accounts, particularly when they invest in real estate.
Proponents of SD-IRAs believe they benefit society because they help lubricate entrepreneurial activity and provide more options for investors. Although corporate lobbyists might think otherwise, some experts say there’s no good reason why tax law should push retirement savings only into things like publicly traded stocks or mutual funds. That said, self-directed accounts can be an attractive vehicle for fraud because they are meant for long-term investments, and there’s a tax penalty for early withdrawal. This can make investors in these accounts more passive as well as provide cover for “a fraud promoter to perpetrate a fraud longer,” according to an investor alert issued by the SEC in 2011. What’s more, because alternative assets often involve no prospectuses and are unregistered, there is little if any oversight by regulators—until it is too late and a con artist has made off with an investor’s retirement money. Other potential problems include price gouging and, of course, illiquidity. When investors need to sell some of these assets, there may not be a ready market for them.
“By itself, the idea of a self-directed IRA is not a problem,” says Joseph Borg, director of the Alabama Securities Commission. “But you can put all sorts of junk in there. We have a lot of issues with them. One of the biggest is that people just assume that the custodian is looking out for them. The fraudsters love it.” Regulators add that con artists sometimes deliberately push people to open SD-IRAs when selling them bogus investments because of the lack of scrutiny of the whole field.
Such problems, however, haven’t deterred investors like Dick Eschleman, a 73-year-old semiretired investor in Sonoma, Calif. A decade ago, he got fed up with Wall Street and dumped all of the mutual funds in his IRA. Instead, he began using the funds to make subprime loans on prefabricated houses. The switch, Eschleman says, enabled him to turn the $200,000 he started with in the account into nearly $1 million. Eschleman says his returns now average 15 % a year—even after accounting for some loans that inevitably go bad. The activity has transformed his retirement and given him something to do that he enjoys and finds fulfilling. “When everything works out, and you check things out yourself, you can do very well,” he says. 
Posted on 6:40 AM | Categories: