After the purchase, and after the two subsidiaries incurred NOLs, the buyer and seller entered into a new agreement NOT to waive the NOL carryback. The seller contracted to keep a certain percentage of the refund (such refund was generated when the two subsidiaries’ NOLs were carried back to the seller’s consolidated tax year) and pay the balance of the refund to the buyer. This change of heart may have occurred when the buyer realized that the NOLs were not usable currently or in the near future and that the opportunity for a percentage of immediate usage was a better option.
The email advice concludes that since the subsidiaries were the “owners” of the refund, not the seller, the seller should not be treated as receiving a nontaxable federal income tax refund. Instead, the IRS viewed the percentage retained by the seller as consideration for entering into the new contract to split the refund with buyer.
0 comments:
Post a Comment