Liz Weston for Inforum.com writes: Q: You always mention fee-only financial planners and I’m not sure
about the true meaning. My husband and I have a financial planner who
charges us $2,200 per year, but we got a summary of transaction fees in
the amount of $6,200 for last year. Is this reasonable? We have $625,000
in IRAs and are adding $1,000 a month. In addition we have over
$700,000 with current employers, adding the max allowed yearly. The
planner gives advice on allocations for these employer funds as well.
Are we paying too much for the financial planner? The IRAs seem to be
doing well, but the market is doing well (today!).
A: It appears
you’re paying both fees and commissions, so you’re not dealing with a
fee-only planner. Fee-only planners are compensated only by the fees
their clients pay, not by commissions or other “transaction fees” for
the investments they buy. One big benefit of fee-only planners is that
you don’t have to worry that commissions they get are affecting the
investment advice they give you.
You’re paying about 1.3 percent
on the portfolio you have invested with this adviser. That’s not
shockingly high, but once you add in all the other costs associated with
these investments, such as annual expense ratios and any account fees,
your relationship with this adviser may be costing you 2 percent a year
or more. That’s getting expensive, unless you’re getting comprehensive
financial planning – help with insurance, taxes and estate planning, as
well as investment advice – from someone qualified to provide such
planning, such as a certified financial planner.
What you pay
makes a big difference in what you accumulate. Let’s say your
investments return an average of 8 percent a year over the next 20
years. If your costs average 1 percent a year, that would leave your
IRAs worth about $3 million. If your costs average 2 percent, you could
wind up with $2.5 million, or half a million dollars less.
Keeping
your expenses low would mean you stop trying to beat the market with
actively traded investments. Instead, you would opt for index funds and
exchange-traded funds that seek to match market returns. These funds
typically come with low expenses, often a small fraction of 1 percent.
Using a fee-only planner can be another way to reduce what you pay for
advice.
At the very least, consider bringing a copy of your
portfolio to a fee-only planner for a second opinion. He or she can give
you a better idea of whether what you’re paying is worth the results
you’re getting.
Q:My father-in-law’s spouse recently died. He is
89 and not in very good health. He has assets of about $3 million and
lives in a state (Pennsylvania) that has an inheritance tax. What can he
do to avoid state taxes and make sure his assets go where he wants them
to go? He does not like to talk about these things but I’m trying to
help. I have no interest in benefits to myself but I would hate to see
his assets go to the state.
A: It’s one thing to encourage a
parent or in-law to set up estate documents that protect them should
they become incapacitated. Everyone should have durable powers of
attorney drawn up so that someone else can make health care and
financial decisions for them if they’re unable to do so.
It’s
quite another matter to urge a potential benefactor to make sure the
maximum amounts possible land in inheritors’ laps, especially if he or
she doesn’t want to discuss the matter. You may need to accept that not
everyone is interested in minimizing taxes for his heirs. Your
father-in-law’s resistance to talk about these things is a good
indicator that you should back off.
It’s not as if the majority of
his assets will wind up in state coffers anyway. Although Pennsylvania
is one of the few states that has an inheritance tax, the rate isn’t
exorbitant for most inheritors. (Unlike estate taxes, which are based on
the size of the estate, inheritance taxes are based on who inherits.)
In Pennsylvania, property left to “lineal descendants” – which includes
parents, grandparents, children and grandchildren – faces tax rates of
4.5 percent. The tax rate is 12 percent for the dead person’s siblings
and 15 percent for all others. Surviving spouses are exempt.
If he
were interested in reducing future inheritance taxes, your
father-in-law could move to one of the many states that doesn’t have
such a tax. He also could give assets away before he dies, either
outright or through an irrevocable trust. He may not be interested in or
comfortable with any of those solutions. If he is, it’s up to him to
take action. If he needs help or encouragement, let your wife or one of
her siblings provide it. In estate planning matters, it’s usually best
for in-laws to take a back seat.
Monday, April 29, 2013
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 comments:
Post a Comment