Dan Bortolotti for ETFDailyNews.com writes: Bonds are one of the least tax-friendly asset
classes: most of their return comes from interest payments, which are
taxed at the highest rate. They’re even less tax-efficient when their
market price is higher than their par value: these premium bonds are taxed so unfavorably they can actually deliver a negative after-tax return.
Unfortunately, because interest rates have trended down for three
decades, virtually every bond index fund and ETF is filled with premium
bonds. Enter the BMO Discount Bond ETF (ZDB), which begins
trading tomorrow. This unique new ETF promises to eliminate the problem
that has long plagued bond funds in non-registered accounts.
Let’s take a step back and review the important idea underpinning this new ETF. Consider a premium bond with a coupon of 5% and a yield to maturity of
3%. The bond will pay you 5% interest annually and then suffer a
capital loss of 2% at maturity, for a total pre-tax return of 3%. Now
consider a discount bond that
pays a coupon of 2% and has the same yield to maturity of 3%: now, in
addition to the interest payments, you’d net a 1% capital gain at
maturity, and your total pre-tax return would again be 3%. In an RRSP
or TFSA, therefore, these two bonds would be virtually identical.
But not so in a taxable account: the investor holding the premium
bond would be fully taxed on the 5% interest payments and would suffer a
capital loss—a double whammy. Meanwhile the holder of the discount bond
would be fully taxed on just 2% in interest, and then taxed on only
half the 1% capital gain. As a result, the discount bond holder would have a significantly higher after-tax return.
There are a couple of ways to hold fixed income in a non-registered account while avoiding premium bonds. One is to use GICs instead of bond funds: GICs always trade at par, so they have lower interest payments and never suffer capital losses. Another is to use strip bonds, which always trade at a discount to par value. Last year saw the launch of the First Asset DEX 1-5 Year Laddered Government Strip Bond Index ETF (BXF), inspired by Justin Bender’s search for
a tax-efficient fixed-income ETF. Now BMO has entered the arena with
the first ETF designed to give taxable investors exposure to the broad
Canadian bond market, but with a portfolio that consists only of
tax-friendly discount bonds.
The new ETF will have characteristics very similar to the BMO
AGGREGATE BOND INDEX ETF(TSE:ZAG), which could be a core bond holding in
any balanced portfolio. The two funds will be very similar in average
term to maturity, duration,
credit quality, yield to maturity and management fee (0.20%). The key
difference, however, will be that ZDB’s average coupon will be lower
that its yield to maturity, resulting in much greater tax-efficiency:
According to BMO, the new fund will hold about 50 issues when it
launches, and as the ETF gathers assets it will build to more than 70
bonds. By comparison, traditional broad-based bond index funds include
hundreds of holdings, but remember, there just aren’t that many discount
bonds available in the marketplace. A portfolio of 50 to 70 is more
than enough to provide adequate diversification.
More potential tax savings
BMO’s latest crop of new ETFs also includes at least on other notable fund. At first glance theBMO MSCI EAFE Index ETF (ZEA) seems late to the party: both iShares and Vanguard have
already launched international equity ETFs without currency hedging.
However, BMO’s is the only one that holds the underlying stocks
directly, rather than holding a US-listed ETF. This structure allows
Canadian investors to avoid one layer of foreign withholding taxes, making the BMO fund potentially less costly in both registered and taxable accounts.
Rather than explaining this idea in full here, I’ll just announce
that Justin and I recently completed a new white paper that includes the
estimated cost (including both MER and foreign withholding taxes) of
many popular ETFs in all account types. The paper will finally allow investors to make informed decisions about this confusing topic. Look for it next week.
0 comments:
Post a Comment